What Is So Valuable?

Oh dear, oh dear.

This is risky, this stuff.

Aaaeeeeer... Had to sort of alter where I was headed at the beginning here, and I'll give you a clue why by asking this question:

What is really so dangerous in any book or set of them, that you have to burn the whole entire damn lot?

Scallops and blueberries - and flowers.

Okay we saw that this was done at the Great Museum of Baghdad, previously, and then several times at the Library (or libraries) of Alexandria.

Was there some attendant volume which actually explained what was really being depicted there on the Metternich Stela?

Well see, the 'Metternich Stela' is, down to this day, shown a lot of the time as just this particular panel with a youthful Horus and some snakes and stuff. Whereas in fact the stela is as shown in this pic down here below -, a whole big thing with a lot of hieroglyphics on it. Now I am among the very few people who think we don't actually know how to translate hieroglyphics. So I don't believe we know what these things on the Metternich Stela, say. These glyphs in the first place, were only made known to initiated priests as to their full and complete meanings and - how to use them!

The 'Metternich Stela' in full.

These are what the Vedas would describe as 'yantras.' They are not actually words like we would use to render us a memorializing of a sound, and then with a meaning for that sound.

If you have a sound with no meaning, then you just have noise. 

But if you have 'noise' with a function -, an objective and a purpose, then theoretically you could have a 'mantra.'

If you have a geometric design or a pictograph which is an aid to memory of a sound with a function - then you have a 'yantra.'

And nobody has ever 'translated' any hieroglyph from that perspective.

Well, I did once here re the capstone of Amenemhat III, albeit I never gave the sounds entailed away.

A human being is a kind of a book.
And certain types of them have
red Moroccan coverings with gilt...

So I do not think anyone out in the academic public knows what the Metternich Stela actually records on it.

I am theorizing here, that someone, probably Amr al-As back in the 7th century, destroyed a text, in other words some scrolls and books of writing, which said what the nature of what we now call the Metternich Stela, really was.

In the same way that, if you look at this recent phenomenon with Kate Bush's song 'Running Up The Hill' and its rise again to No 1 in the UK, on account of Stranger Things (which I have not seen) - then to me it is the same thing as what Amr al-As did. Which is namely, to try and obliterate the meaning of something.

'Stranger Things' has as its story skeleton, that the government has some secret project to work on what the info calls 'the supernatural.' Well in fact, the government does not have anything such thing at all, never did, and never will.

I know very well what the original 'Stargate' programs were all about - they were about having certain naturally-gifted people (who were then trained up) stare at photographs and try to interpret the shadows and the light that they saw and come to supportable conclusions about what was on the actual photographic image.

That's like me
on any give day.
What sort of book covering...

Subsequent to that, some people went off and developed other things, because they realized that some high altitude photograph readers were able to 'do other things' besides see what was on the image. They were able to close their eyes and 'see' actual places clearly, with movement and everything. And those people stepped out of government.

The government, even were it to discover that people could do various strange and unusual and useful 'supernatural' things - would seek to block that. Same with academia. They wouldn't do it. Whether secretly or not secretly, they just wouldn't do it at all.

'Running Up The Hill' was written about the child of a person, whose books were all burned - by the government. Your government. Not 'Amr al-As' fifteen hundred years ago.

Well but what was in there that was so important, in the sense of being 'not important for real,' but important as in significantly dangerous...? And who would it have been dangerous too?

'Stranger Things' is in no way realistic in terms of its basic underlying proposition.

But is it functional to obscure something, though?

And what is that something?

Surely if something having been committed to writing is just plainly silly or foolish or wrong factually, then you just leave it and everyone laughs at it. And that's that about it.

Why go to all these exorbitant lengths about destroying them all; literally, all of them.

Well of course, just like Amr al-As failed to actually achieve his ends, although in the short-ish term he succeeded, in the same way those books burned by the US government are readily enough available today, if expensively so.

This is the only thing they'll
let you know about.
Only the bad parts though.
This'll all make sense when you get to
see the new thing, soon.

Let me tell you it is a lot more complicated than you might think. What you might be thinking is that, well, these books hold some interesting stuff about 'supernatural' phenomena and whatever, and they were promoting some kinds of unrealistic ideas that were nonetheless presented quite attractively, and therefore government wished to put a halt to having people be misled by them (the books).

This is the sort of thing the Beijing CCP does with the Falun Gong people, except there is more to that too, than what meets the eye.

But that is not the main 'problem.'

Now I'm going to be able to tell you about the details of the 'main problem,' in something coming up very soon, and I won't pre-empt that by talking about the specific content, but what I can say is that human beings have haptic sensory features that are able to discern risky things (nociception) - like when something is going to structurally fail against our weight, or when something is getting too hot... ...But those haptic sensory systems go beyond just 'touch' using the hand, and they go all the way into things like olfaction and then, maybe to other sensory channels as well. But they still rely on the actual physical material conveying of something, even if it is on the molecular scale of things - which seem like they are 'invisible' but they are not 'invisible' as such to all of our senses when these are functioning in highly elevated states.

This is most acutely demonstratable (and Luca Turin describes this in his books) by comparing the neural reaction differences in people who are smelling synthetic fragrances, versus the same people smelling real natural fragrance molecules. Well it all goes a lot further than just the olfaction side of things..  

...I don't know whether you are starting to get an inkling of where this all goes from here now.

 But if you do know where it is going, then you will instantly be aware that human beings have been being blocked and cut off from these totally natural human capacities of awareness - literally for thousands of years. And you will however, also realize that we should not just be spreading this kind of knowledge around carelessly, because you know for sure that it will be exploited, and people manipulated by extremely malevolent forces like those always found in power politics and also by people using the forcefulness of governments to get what they want at your expense and exclusion.

What could be that bad for these guys, that they don't want you to even know about it??

I want to stress very strongly here, and I've said it before - when I say 'ET Alien,' I mean explicitly and completely without any equivocation whatsoever, beings that are real, physical, material, and travel here from extremely far away. Now notwithstanding that, sure, there could be, and there mostly always is, quite a lot of 'preparation' required and this can certainly involve using your mind and your thoughts and arranging how you think and respond and react - nevertheless we are talking hard touch reality things here and not myths, visions, metaphors, hallucinations, 'lucid dreaming,' or any of that. 

Lot of nice books.

You're going to really understand this and find this out, when you get to see the upcoming new stuff, and are then able to put into operation, what you learn then. 

See -, you can't just go into a city, for example, and meet a generous bank manager on simply any street corner, but if you did in any event, you almost certainly would not be able to detect that person because there are so many other things and people there that absorbing your attention. (This is already a clue because we all know 'bank managers' are to be found in offices, behind labels which say 'bank manager...'). Maybe, though, that is not how you want to find your bank manager.

This is why you 'don't see it.' Not because 'it' isn't there (what you are looking for), but because there is so much there! And all of it has the wrong label on it.

...This track is a thousand percent (yeah I know, no such thing as a 'thousand percent!') better than when you hear it the first time. The first time you'll go: 'Ah yeah, so what? Pretty much nothing special there.' Hah!

To The Most Corrupt Places

The most corrupt people go to the most corrupt places.

Anyway...

In the ancient Vedas, in all the skandhas, and basically as the underlying philosophical dichotomy (as explained in the Bhagavata) of all the living beings in the Universe, is the concept that the majority of beings consist of those who are under the belief that it is possible to annihilate Shiva in particular, and the Trimurti as a whole group thereafter, by literally denying Shiva's existence, and by continuously taking and then exerting absolute control over all material things, all matter - which they see as 'without mind' and thus able to be subjugated.

This is how I remember Malay women,
when I was growing up. Naturally,
it wasn't always exactly like this,
because they did more things than 
play around in water all day long.

This dichotomy is understood as a war which is going on. And which war never fully ended with the Mahabharata.

So these texts describe 'demons' but the concept of 'demons' in the Vedas is much more complex and detailed than the social-cultural and folkloric concept about the word, in the West.

'Demon' is not always just a Titanic monster as it is depicted in Jewish traditional literature, and it is not even the case that Titans, Reptilians and/or preternatural snake-beings (the Nagas), are all 'demonic,' but only that kind are -, who are 'a-suras.'

And this means those who totally abstain from wine.

'A -' not (having), 'sura,' alcoholic nectar.

'Nectar' you can get from 'Surya;' the Sun.

And I previously told you how.

The greatest of the Asuras was Shalva.

He possessed a massive space ship which was like a whole city. However there was only darkness inside there, with some kind of glow from crystals and jewels. But otherwise there was no light, and absolutely no entry points for sunlight - or starlight, or moonlight. In other words no light from natural objects which gave light from their existential dynamic 'heat' - because, in fact light from crystals is on account of entrapped electrons that are released. The 'dynamic potential action state' of the crystals - if they were acquired from Nature and not synthesized artificially - is pressure and the entrapment, containment, and 'holding up' of electron flow potential.

All ethnic Malay people, men as 
well as women, wore a batik or 
gold or silver threaded batik
form of folded headgear called 
'tanjak' or more generally
'tengkolok.' Some of the women
wore only combs in their hair and 
no headgear at all.

A lot of people in the 'New Age Guru' business have recently been asserting that 'grey ET Aliens' are demonic, malevolent, and bad/evil.

They are not, however, and it is easy enough for someone to ascertain whether anything masquerading quite possibly as an ET Alien, is not in fact a demonic thing: they will not imbibe alcohol. 

And this is attested to as well, in Timothy in the New Testament - 'for such (people) forbid sex and enjoin abstinence from certain foods (and drink), giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons.' 

Some modern Vedic scholars suggest that 'Asura' means a being who resides in a different dimension, in the 'aether', on account of the fact that 'sura' can also mean 'the essential spirit' or the 'ethereal' - but that is not correct because directly stated in the Vedas themselves, is the idea that 'Surya' is partly also composed of 'aether' which is because it is itself ('svayam' - means 'itself' or 'himself' or even 'yourself') also existing in the ethereal 'world' at the same time that it is here with us in our plane of material existence.

'Asura' means a being, a person, an entity, who does not imbibe alcohol. And this is also why you will find atheistic materialists all claiming to be 'realistic' and rationalistic thinkers, and never 'out of their minds' - and they are the very first to point the finger at anyone who disagrees with any pronouncements they make, as 'crazy' or 'out of their mind;' whereas they themselves never are that. ...Are they.

Even when they use medications, it is because of 'mental health' and not because they are refusing to face reality...

I have never ever seen women
attired like this in Malaya when I was 
growing up. This is Arabic, Middle-Eastern
desert clothing. It is not Tropical
attire at all.
When I was growing up, and you 
went to rice fields where there were
bullocks plowing, often these were run
by Malay women (and women and men both planted
and cut rice) - and they were bare from the 
waist up. I mean to say, entirely. And that
was also the case in the fishing villages. Not always
because it was not always hot and humid,
there were Monsoons too.

Or if they ever indeed 'use drugs' it is because they are doing so 'recreationally.'

Their strategy to control material things and the material Universe, and to compete with each other and never to share anything unconditionally, is demonic, and leads to their acquiring a lot of material wealth and material power.

Material wealth itself is not evil or bad, but it is in fact the only form of viable external 'negotiating' power that an atheist may have. And that is why they must have it.

Often a person who is exploring the psychology of economics on this planet, will experience and also witness incredible 'controls' being imposed on the flows of all dynamic forms of energy. And this is necessary to make a 'franchise' out of atheistic materialism. You can imagine, for example, if you were to be able to simply -, 'toil not, neither spin' and yet somehow have wealth and make money.

Yet you will see, albeit not so commonly, and you have to look for them very hard to discern them - certain types of people who live materially quite successful lives without serving the obtaining system of strict atheistic materialism. These people often, if not almost always in fact, disguise their lives - and they make themselves look like one thing, whereas they are something else entirely.

But then again they only disguise their lives from the foolish and the ignorant. They are, if anything, out there, hidden in plain sight.

I wonder if I can find one or two examples, in coming days, perhaps identities who are not with us today, because we don't want people heading off and annoying anyone now, do we?

Anyway, for now, back to the normal trance programming and away from all of those tears:

  

The Mystery Of Human Life

Somewhere, in one of the great texts of the great thinkers and philosophers, maybe even in something said by Saint Anthony (this is the ascetic monk of Egypt, 3rd century AD) although I doubt as much him, necessarily - there is, fully explained to us, in a way that we can easily understand, the mystery of the human being, and of his life.

Interestingly in the case of this very wealthy guy, Anthony, who gave away all of his material riches to live in the desert or something ('off grid,' I suppose), he once questioned God about how come some people die at great age, and some good people very young, some are very wealthy, and some hard-working honest people remain not wealthy their whole lives... ...to which he received a reply from an angelic source, more or less delivering the pronouncement of God to Anthony: 'Ah shut up and mind your own business. Don't worry about them, just worry about your own affairs.'

What do people learn, over their lives?
Wendy Matthews - Canadian-Australia
singer, songwriter.

Even though he, Anthony, did go off on his own largely, although people came to visit him and inquire of him his thoughts on various matters - even though he went 'off grid,' let's face it, there was no television in those days, and he was often visited by demons and 'phantoms of women.' Well, I must say though, this is pretty cool, Anthony. It's all very well you sending them all away all the time but come on man, they must have kept you slightly entertained to some extent. 

I mean I know just actual real women can be damn annoying sometimes and you would like to just 'send them away' too but you can't... 'Phantom women' who were trying to tempt Anthony away from his austerities would have had to have been 'not so outright annoying' because they would have been trying to 'tempt' him rather than simply 'be there' accompanying him in his ordinary affairs and offering endless gratuitous 'advice' like they all do. 

Yeah, I dunno Anthony. I think apart from your initial great act of giving wealth away (which is pretty meritorious), the rest of the stuff is just a lot of side-tracking, distractions in the way of nothing very special at all. I have never read any account of Anthony's demons that explained what was so atrociously bad about them. So... Demons. So... Phantom wenches... And the point of all of that is what?

Of course, I am being unnecessarily hyper-critical and perhaps unkind too, I suppose. After all, he did give away all his money.

They learn all kinds of stuff.
I don't know what (they learn).
Because that ain't me.
 

There's nothing about this Saint Anthony's life that explains the real underlying mystery of the human existence. He kind of says something to the effect of that you must focus your mind on God, and he doesn't really say 'pray to' or 'worship' or 'submit' or anything like...

Interestingly to me, he does say 'turn your complete attention to -, all the time.' And that is interesting.

There's nothing either though, in the reports and accounts given by others of what that actually means - what are you exactly focusing on, Anthony? When you say 'God' what are you looking at?

When the Old Testament (the Tanakh) says 'dew of heaven' it almost certainly does not mean this was some actual substance that literally came from actual 'heaven' that people all mean when they mean that 'supernal' place and not just simply 'the sky' or 'the clouds.'

If it was dew from actual heaven, then, hey, it might have had some amazing properties and given some amazing sensations... And then Nebuchadnezzar would have been having a good time, being out in the open, with everyone thinking he was in a sad state of things - but he was getting drunk on this 'dew of heaven!'

Alas however I do not think that was the situation.

We're just out here, being in the desert,
being drenched with the dew of heaven...

I am myself not into these 'turns of phrases' just doing for important places and important matters. You know, like it's all just a metaphor.

Nah nah nah nah.

If Anthony of Egypt gave real wealth away from his own material possessions, then God has to give him real heaven, not 'metaphorical heaven!' 

As for the other 'Saint Anthony,' the one that helps you find things - his real birth name was Fernando. And he was from Lisbon, Portugal and he lived in the 12th and 13 centuries AD, and he started off trying to preach to the Moroccan guys who had beheaded five friars - but his ship went off-course and he ended up in Sicily and from there went on to Tuscany, I think.

All these poor human beings, living all kinds of different, and often slightly mixed-up, and sometimes rather mixed-up, lives.

Some are Nebuchadnezzar, and some are the Moroccan King Yusuf II (who denied the attributes of Allah because they were incompatible to his Oneness) who beheaded the first five Franciscan friars when they would not convert to Islam, although, to be fair, they were annoying him as well, since they were trying to 'convert' him as well...

And some are the Anthony who went 'off grid' in the Egyptian desert, and some are the ABBA kids who went to the desert in the dark, at night, under the stars to have photos taken.

And there was one time, this guy who came along, and said that not even King Sulaimaaaaaahn, in all his glory, was arrayed as magnificently, as a single flower bearing the dew of heaven. I added the 'bearing the dew of heaven' bit. Because I can.

Actually it's not even the 'arrayed more magnificently than Solomon in all his glory' part that I'm interested in. It's frankly, that 'and they toil not, neither do they spin.'

You know -, men toil, and women spin. ; )

    

Trying To Keep It Simple!

Hah! How is that gonna happen here?

LOL

Never mind; what can you do...

So, why we are not all 'one consciousness,' and why you are unique...

And then the next thing -, what is all this I see almost everywhere about 'a different reality?'

If it isn't real, it isn't real!

The young girls wear a garland of
dry figs, not dried rose petals!
'Consider the lesson of the fig tree,
when it is time for it to bear fruit.'

The key to 'personality' is not 'thinking,' 'feeling,' and 'behaving.' It is feeling.

Current attempts at developing AI focus on processing, and speed, and numbers of complex connections. You could construe this as 'thinking.' I would not completely reject that.

In some sort of Boolean operator system, a FI/FO process could go backwards and forwards between 'itself' on two parts of a circuit board(!) and that might even be construed to be a kind of 'self-awareness.' Given let's say a primary directive to 'exist' and to stay existing, a thing using Boolean logic gates in a viable moving, and maybe actuator-enabled 'work' mechanism, would react to various sensed signals - hence it would 'behave' in a certain way; exhibit 'behavior.'

See, frankly, it's only the feeling part of psychologists' fairy tale about what personality 'is,' that actually determines unique behavior. You could suppose that there were hard and fast 'boundary conditions' which made certain actions, behaviors absolutely inevitable - and that might be true on the one hand, but then it doesn't cater for the whole Gaussian profile of existential reality. 

We are like steam plumes rising off a hot pool, or snowflakes falling into someone's palm. The attempts to employ ideas like 'Chaos Theory' to salvage some conclusions about the predictability of steam plume spirals or the exact shape of freezing raindrops is bogus. The actions of the spirals are unique moment-to-future moment (within certain parameters) and the shapes of the snowflakes are all actually unique.

Then the girls have a feast of
sizzling garlic prawns...
No they don't. Sorry. Just tryin' to
use 'Chaos Theory' a bit here.

Now I could say something about girls carrying baskets in which there are seeds for various colored flowers, and not each girl's basket has the same number or type of plant seed - but if I did that it would give way too much information to lunatics masquerading as scientists at places like Imperial College London. But in short, there is 'trade in seed' going on... Isn't there?

Every one of you has six 'Caryatid' flower maidens inside of you.

Instead of talking too specifically about that, let us step away from that dangerous area, and just talk about the young high-born virgin maidens, who spend two years (now no one in the whole history of the modern world has ever told you this before, on account it was a close secret even back then when the Parthenon at the Acropolis was 'alive') collecting dew from flowers, until at the end of those two years, they go deep underground into a secret place, where they exchange their dew for something which they carry back up, under a cloth covering. This is called the 'Arrhephoria' rites.

Then, over the next seven years, they learn how to make and bake a magical bread which lots of people can eat, even though there seems to be little of it. 

And then immediately after that, they go back down into the underground place, where they learn the secrets of death and resurrection - and this is called the 'Canephoros' rites.

Which religion is this?

LOL

Frua-designed BMW - when cars
were still on the rising side of the
Gaussian profile. As soon as they are starting
to hit the peak of the curve, parasites and
zombies quickly close in and wreck everything.
That's how it is. For now.

None of this stuff is simple, though. 

What is simple is to know that you are unique. And that no, there is no such thing as 'consciousness is only one consciousness and we all share it and therefore...' Therefore whatever they are trying to say. 

And it's simple enough for you consider this concept that you are permanently entering into potential situations giving you opportunity to exchange types of flowers with others who are fully functioning within.

It's the 'flowers' that really allow you to have 'feelings' at that super complex depth humans can have them, might have them, and in fact however, rarely do experience them. They want them, but they rarely get them.

You, on the other hand, might get what you want.

  

Go To Sources

Well this is no revelation! 

See the thing is, there is so much confusion about ideas from the past these days. 

You can take something quite interesting like Fowles' The Magus and read way too much into it. All it is fundamentally an idea that individual people repeat or 'play out' or mirror, big things that happen across the whole of society, on the national and world stage, and in a sense they also follow in line with concepts of 'labeled' divinities (of the ancient past, of mythology).

Candice Bergen as Artemis, in
The Magus.

The problem for me being that people take what they see there in these sorts of books and films, and impute whatever is in there, to the actual original descriptions about the 'gods' that ancient people had.

I'll give you a really good example from right now, today.

If you look up 'Lucretius,' the first century BC thinker and poet - who wrote 'The Nature of Things' (apparently in five books, all composed in verse form) - all you find is a vast echo-chamber across the internet saying that, 'despite Lucretius being probably the first person who proposed Evolution, and the first who explain atoms as the building blocks of everything, he also ended his first book declaring the absurdity of the idea that the Earth was a sphere, even though this was by then an established view among most thinkers.'

Yeah well you find me where he actually says any such thing and I will give you a pat on the back.

He never says it! At all. He was writing in Latin to a retired Roman Tribune who was intending to purchase some land nearby where Lucretius lived, with the view of building a property there where he (Memnius, not Lucretius) and others were going to write pornography. Lucretius was trying to dissuade Memnius.

For the vegetable-loving people:
blistered padrons.

And he uses some words like 'mundus' which never meant 'the Earth' back then, and which Lucretius is clearly using in terms of the visible, manifest, material Universe of things, everything, including things in space. And he is actually describing Universal gravity or gravitational forces - and saying that what others are suggesting about it is absurd -, and it is in the context of what he is talking about.

But how are you ever going to get to every single remorseless ignorant uneducated idiot, who keeps saying that he said something that he never said?

You'll be wasting your time. The lesson they all never learned at any stage, was to go consult the actual sources.

And then, in any case afterwards, you'd have to go 'fix up' the next piece of, and every other piece of bloody nonsense that is just simply everywhere these days, masquerading as 'facts' and 'information!'

Unfortunately one combined total overall effect of this kind of thing is it promotes this notion that, well, these 'smart' people of the past, yes they were smart, about one or two things, but see, they didn't know this or they were foolish and ignorant about that... So therefore just don't go looking too closely at them or go too deeply into what they can teach, because we know everything - and they didn't.

It's completely the other way round.

And fennel and almond soup.
Not too bad this stuff...

So did Jesus really morph on that road into a different-looking body or body structure and face, or was it maybe a completely different body altogether - when those two 'did not recognize Him because He appeared in another form to them?'

You will even get mainstream church people actually say: 'No, He didn't.' And then they'll give all kinds of weird explanations that are not found in any source text at all to justify what they are wanting to assert to be true.

The actual source text unambiguously says 'He appeared in another form to them.'

Now you can really split hairs here trying to make the word 'appear/ed' apply just to what the two people witnessing something were doing exclusively (IE 'seeing' thus apprehending that which 'appeared' lol), and but not, apply to the existential minute specific dimensions of the actual figure itself/Himself. 

Yet the text does not say 'appeared as if like another form;' it says in another form.

So yes, Christians have more than just three 'gods:' they have Father, Son, Holy Ghost, Mary (LOL I include this for Dr Zakir Naik and his followers), Baby Jesus, Jesus 1, and Jesus 2.

Which leads us nicely back to my real point started up by a good questioner here earlier on: What is Personality?

The Christian 'Father' God, does not have the same personality as His Son -, 'Jesus.' And by all accounts this 'Holy Spirit' has quite a distinct character and personality as well. But they all have 'God' powers. And they all have the same 'God' powers. And which makes them all equally 'Divinity.' 

Lucretius puts this type of conceptual problem this way: '...emerging from the arrangements of distinct particles.' And I agree with him.

The Caryatids.
Sort of '5 of 5' I suppose.
They are the 'Maidens of Karyai,'
who as real people in real life
carry baskets of live reeds on their heads as if they
were dancing plants.'
; ) Sacred to Artemis.

'7' is integral with '9' and with all of the Nine. But she has an individual separate real personality. So they are several persons who are one thing (when integrated).

Did Jesus 2 have different particles in Him, compared to Jesus 1? Or was it just that the arrangement of particles was different?

LOL

This is what is known as an Irish Catholic Question. What happened to His fingernail clippings, and His hair? The Muslims have much more 'rugged' questions about it but along the same lines.

Look. Look. Don't break your mind on this. This is just me being silly for a while here.

And yes, I could easily drift into the 'And Loki kept all the nail clippings in order to make a ship from to save some people in the world at the Ragnarok later...'

This is the 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail' kind of thing again, you see. Do Jesus' nail clippings have all the Divine powers of the rest of the particles which make 'Him' up...?

Aaaaaah! See it all turns on what we are proposing 'Him' to even be.

Don't worry, I'll distract you
well enough that you won't have seen
part of the super secret here.

Same goes for 'you.' And 'me.' All of us are something about what we are on the unseen inside, and which thing has zero need to tie any single particle or set of particles on the material 'outside' to the 'us,' the real 'us.'

But believe me, the worst possible thing, would be for some staggeringly advanced thinker or philosopher way more advanced even than Lucretius, to perfectly pin down what that set of internal compositions was, which made up the personality that could move from one 'arrangement of particles' to another and yet fully still be the same actual person. 

Because then you'd have AI promoters and CGI companies all literally manufacturing you.

Meaning human beings as such.

Luckily, it's a mystery. That they will never find out. And this, my friends, is why people such as Pythagoras and especially Orpheus (and Ovid - do you read... ...Ovid?) had 'mystery schools' that required initiation into and all kinds of very serious oaths and so on to be taken before certain levels of knowledge was imparted. I don't have this kind of stuff to impart though. Whew. Got away with that one pretty good for the moment.

Great music (relax, lay your head down on this):