X-Rated And Very Rude...

In the words of Ricky Gervais... Well, we don't need to actually say those words.

But you see the problem with the sexual and gender propaganda that is firmly in everyone's faces today, is that it plays on people's propensity to find things that they are, or else simply can be made, angry about. It plays on frustration. It is straight from the Tavistock social science human coercion manual. Tavistock is formally known as 'the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations' and its current number one client is the European Union.

Batwoman's real car...

And it makes no secret of working for the so-called - I mean to say, it actually publicizes this - Third Sector; which is namely, for George Soros.

The genuine history especially of relatively modern instances of public figures who drifted this side and that side of the gender demarcations - is that all the major overt icons were not symbols or icons of sexual frustration: Marlene Dietrich was not, nor Patricia Highsmith, Greta Garbo, Gore Vidal, Truman Capote, Jean Cocteau... None of them were.  

And speaking of Cocteau - at least the name, anyway - it is possible to look at an example (of a public figure) along the extreme feminine side of the spectrum, Elizabeth Fraser from Cocteau Twins, and then compare such a female with another female way across to the masculine side, say someone like the late Magdalene Berns, or Julia Beck, or even Martina Navratilova. ...And realize very easily that they are all obviously female and women.

That you see, is not the method of this type of Tavistock propaganda - they (Tavistock) are not trying to promote sexual drift at all...

No one is 'confused' by a masculine woman. No one is even confused by a lesbian woman.

Real batwoman

Ah no no, you see - this crowd is promoting 'incel;' involuntary celibacy -, and ultra veganism which will tamper negatively with your brain as well as your body, and anything that expresses inadequacy. The latest thing is so-called (it's called this, but it isn't a scientifically accurate terminology) 'Dopamine fasting.'

So what I have linked to here - which is downloadable - is 'x-rated' and for the robust only, but it will point out to you that the 'Chelsea boot' which every stupid fool who thinks they are a London denizen or part of today's pretend 'upper class,' and who thinks they know what 'James Bond' dressing is all about, and thinks they know what they are wearing when they don black-tie tuxedo... ...well the Chelsea boot that all these idiot men are wearing believing they are the bee's knees in Savile Row male ritual formality appropriate to, why, them themselves of course, the putative 'upper class' who all went to Oxford and Eton on daddy's corruption money thereby entitling them to the appellation 'aristocracy -' 

well, it's a lady's shoe.

Batwoman - Bon Ton Rouler

  

'Pop Culture Does Not Represent Them.'

Those are some of the words of one of our commentators here - they posted a comment down below the last article basically to the effect that there are modern cultural styles that are authentically presenting masculine figures, but these are out in the non-urban areas, and they are virtually never given much positive attention in the popular media. 

When you are living out in the rural regions or in the wilderness or any less-than-urban areas, by force of necessity you have to be capable of solving material problems and you have to deal realistically with real situations - in short, there is little scope to 'explore,' to 'meander' into the modern urban effeminate affectations.

I have no problem entertaining dispute or debate about what really constitutes 'effeminacy' as I seem to have pitched the term here just now.

Actually I am not someone who believes there are no such things at all as naturally effeminate individuals, or even that there are no such things as naturally homosexual people - I just do sense there is an agenda at work in the modern day however, which is in essence and at heart not at all interested in the rights of any such people. And I further think there are grounds to believe the agenda is extraordinarily dangerous and capable of ripping power from individuals as vital human participants in human society, and substituting a top-down ideology in which you cannot see who is sitting at the top.

You see people can argue, they can debate, they can tussle and tug at each other's hold on the moral prevalence at any given moment - because even if it were the case that we had some amazing mathematical calculus for 'solving' precisely, the given questions we have about gender, sex, equality, social rights and responsibilities and even duties, the fact is life is dynamic and many things about it change continuously. Which is the reason many minds have to present their various views and the best judgement reached in important matters.

Some absolute principals always hold but only in the same sense that Pythagoras's Theorem always holds - yet it NEVER materially exists by nature nor can it be found in a perfect template in the material Universe, and many things change all the time around the non-material but absolutely real, principal that governs the theorem.

I guess what I mean to say is that there are sound logically and philosophical grounds to grab onto a 'vision,' or many aligned visions about what it means to be a good human being, a good man, a good woman, a decent person - and just for right now, icons of traditional masculinity, and traditional femininity, are pole stars. They are important. Because via them you can see what 'games' other people are playing who are only seeking to deliberately confuse and to unsettle. We are smart - we know how to distinguish between irony and dissembling.

Here's Dorothea Taylor - she's a pro-drummer who recently went viral with a short video clip of herself hitting the skins on 'Down With The Sickness' - a heavy HEAVY piece by 'Disturbed.' 

Now as you all know well and truly by now, because I've been on about it for a while, I am right now finishing a collaborative effort with some women who are still highly 'active and not yet ready for retirement' - I think that's the phrase I was given... LOL

And over the next few articles there will be a few 'interesting' bits and pieces for ya, leading up to what will be released into the 'Q'-a-sphere as 'Disclosure - Rainbow Bombs.' But you don't need to know about that yet. I'm just letting it DROP here and now in case the seeping out that is already on-going gets to people who say hey why didn't you tell us?

I have been telling you. But some of you are still worrying about the wrong things.

So, 'Q drops,' eh... Rainbow Bombs. That's what will drop.

Remember what I just said. 

All These New (Old) Perspectives

All of you regulars know that I am at the moment working with a small team of women academics from er, Swarthmore...

Swarthmore being one of the earliest coeducational colleges in the United States.

What I am becoming more and more conscious of, however, is not so much the confusing state of women's 'self-identities' within society - which is definitely real enough - but the subtle changes in male iconography.

It used to be that one of the quiet, slightly folkloric items of scuttlebutt inside of mainstream intelligence and counter-intelligence communities, was that some operatives could 'beat the lie-detector.' This was based on authentic research about neural networks and their operation, and the idea that when someone consciously understands how a thing operates inside the whole brain, it is possible to divert response nerves with deliberate distracting measures you take that others cannot see or detect that you are employing.

Well things have moved a long way down the road from those days and frankly, I don't think it is possible anymore to deceive a full-suite 'lie detector' screening.

Why this is important - is that it is bad policy to try and fabricate things to the CIA if you are in any way engaging with them. And that also means in turn, that the people there have a massive responsibility to do the right thing at all times.

It is utterly critical in today's world, to align behind some positive forward direction intended to provide a beneficial and functioning, functional, legacy for the future.

This has got to emerge as a broad social phenomenon.

It cannot be, that people accept it is possible to cut any moral corners 'just' for the sake of seeming security goals. 

One possible slogan could be 'don't cut any moral corners, ever.'  We become the thing we are claiming to stand against -, to be fighting against, when we cut those corners ourselves in the name of some specious overriding objective. There are none. There are no 'overriding objectives.'

It's possible to not like some process or procedure that is unfolding because we live in an imperfect world. But that is not the same thing as making a pretense of creating 'perfection' by just 'slightly' getting a little bit pregnant!

This is where the UK has gone, this is the road it has taken recently and I don't think it will easily find the way back. 

John Brennan is an operative of people centered in Luxembourg, not Washington. There are many words to describe him and I don't feel this is the place to use them...

Brennan currently works for something known as the 'Global Strategies Group.'

Social 'movements' have become, these days, all 'global movements,' and that is because they are part of a 'global strategy.'

I have been slowly learning what would be easily identified as a 'woman' projecting authentically in a woman's mindset in the middle of a contemporary social (meaning also in a multi-gender work environment too) context. The proposition that has been put to me - and which I accept - is that there is and has been very much in evidence, such a thing as 'the false feminine.'

But what is the authentic masculine? Now? Nowadays, as opposed to the days of my and your fathers?

Modern Women Kung Fu

There is this 'feminine lifestyle philosopher' around the place, see - called Candice Oneida.

And she is going to end up turning the world as we know it, upside down.

This coming year is showing all the signs of being one in which upheaval will be evidenced, although it has probably been going on beneath the surface of things for some time now.

This is one of those times when ancient ideas, that usually lie quite dormant, will serve the wise very well. 

One ought not to make the mistake, of thinking that popular visions of things - especially ancient cultural ones - are exactly the same as the real things themselves! 

The legendary Yim Wing Chun, near enough, anyway

The Qing Dynasty at a certain point, learning that the Shaolin Monastery was developing new fighting strategies and techniques that were unparalleled - even though these were not necessarily intended to overcome the Qing particularly - nevertheless pre-emptively invaded, massacring almost all of the monks and burning the temple to the ground. One Shaolin priestess, Ng Mui, escaped, and eventually found a very young girl living in a wood, whom she trained to become the famous 'Yim Wing Chun,' the undefeated kung fu exponent who ended up becoming, of course, quite legendary. 

Today the art of Wing Chun Kung Fu is still highly popular around the whole world - from as far apart as from, for example, Scandinavia, all the way to the most southern parts of South America. But there is little in the popular versions that still retains the deeper philosophy that Ng Mui imparted to her first student. 

Modern-day Wing Chun Master Wan Kam Leung

You will find these elements, however, in the teachings of Candice Oneida. And, as with the first modern-era revolutionary of this mysterious dark art, namely Yim Wing Chun herself, Oneida will slowly, with circularity and with subtlety, upturn many apple-carts before too many people even realize that it has happened.

The Ghost Of Christmas

Yet to come...?

LOL!