In three days it will be the Winter Solstice here in the Southern Hemisphere. Supposedly, it is High Summer in London town right now, and I see, with the coverage of the half-dozen or so (false) contenders for leadership of the UK Parliamentary Conservative Party - door-stop interviews and footpath chases and so on - that it is mostly raining over there.
Rory Stewart was busted yesterday as a 'one-time' (huh! ...lol) MI6 spy. A lot of the mainstream media keeps saying about him: 'he's come from nowhere.' 'An unknown up until recently.' 'A man with a likable personality and a clear vision.' The major masthead newspaper that ran the story was The Telegraph. This was the paper once owned by Conrad Black and now owned by those identical twin UK iconoclasts - the infamous Barclay brothers of Brecqhou and Sark (Channel Islands). For all its best efforts to tell the unvarnished truth - and they regularly do that - even The Telegraph is also probably even more often hamstrung and held back by legal injunctions and various pressures exerted by the government and their backers, to delay or obscure what facts are discovered and known by their senior journalists and editors.
...by the independent Milanese family house, Canali
The number one - and I mean THE NUMBER ONE - scandal in the US and the UK right now is the suppression by interests of the Obama Administration, of the interdiction of a Hezbollah plot to blow up targets in London in 2015. The scandal is that the bomb plot was huge and involved very large amounts of explosives, and that the Obama Administration 'negotiated' a deal with Tehran within a few months of the plot being uncovered. What did those 'negotiations' actually mean? Obviously, no one got any large illegal cash payments processed through Panama... No, because 'they' were looking there to get as far away as possible from where it all went down; notmentioningtheUkrainehereanywhere. I don't know. Seriously, I do not believe there will be a general public revealing of what was going on then - and to some extent in various hornets' nests still today. I mean just how do you tell the voting public any of these things? Do any of you (still) think that James Comey was on the foreign embargoed accounts desk of HSBC New York, because he was an experienced, 'temporarily ex-government' senior bureaucrat. Because it is entirely possible that the programming has gone too deep and you cannot face the facts of it all. For one thing, it is literally the key Washington 'invisible hand' that pushes this current propaganda scam in which vitriolic accusations are leveled at anyone and everyone who is not a supplicant to the 'Grand Master' of the 'place at the end of the rainbow.' LOL You know what I mean. Don't you want to find where the rainbow ends?
It ends here, dude, in the middle of Winter, in the cold and in the dark.
You know when you see this term 'the elite' these days, I'm not sure exactly what people understand it to mean. On the surface, there is, for instance, a strata of people in Germany, who are in the league of the 'extremely wealthy.' These are individuals who personally have from say, fifty million euros in cash above debt and forward maintenance costs on property (unlike the French 'moneyed class' who have exactly no money at all and a huge forward expenses bill in view all the time but own nice old buildings) - to um, fifty billion euros and above. They have these huge highly secured buildings in Bavaria and Eastern Switzerland, in which note shuffling machines work virtually day-long so that the bills on the bottoms of the stacks don't wear away to dust... You think I'm kidding, don't you?
This one's not a bad bloke, all in all. He owns, he owns,
owns, well... ...everything!
Give or take not very much that's left over in the West.
So the 'elite' Germans hang out at extremely private functions now and then, in which they pat themselves on the backs for all the things they have done. In several cases this consists of being smart enough to have been adopted by the original Reimann Family bosses (they had no actual genetic kids, as far as anyone knows), and as a consequence now own a conglomerate which is just about (IE probably is) the world's richest corporate group. Now. Now... Nyeee-o-o-o-w... Apologies to those fellas and fellettes here of rare and uncommon gender. You think you are or have been, or 'did/were and thereabouts' - running an agenda for awhile; something social/political and broadly-based - or maybe just that others like yourself have been and you are helping tag along or render support, whatever. Well, see, it's not all exactly like you think it is, see... See certain of these big industrial German families have some strange members in them... ...really really st-r-a-a-a-a-an-g-e. Trust me - it's not going to end up where you suspected it could have. There's a two-layered thing going on: on the one hand, these companies take someone else's crafted product, cheat on the in-puts, multiply the volumes, and then sell it to the stupid public as a 'luxury' item and 'brand.' At which point the thing itself is unrecognizable to those who actually made up the original market (the buyer, and it prolly just was one buyer in some cases!). And then along came the GFC. But then there was the 'bail-out' scheme across the globe, in which all their capital assets went up on paper and were underwritten by various taxpayer cohorts in several countries.
It's Burberry, but not any Burberry you
and I are allowed to buy
Were there really any sales of the genuine items? Nah, probably not or at best the same amount as always - which is 'not very many.' When the governments and their central banks flushed cash into the coffers of the top-tier racketeers then meaningful numbers of 'sales' appeared on balance sheets signed-off by the remnants of the global auditing racket absent Arthur Andersen (the actual only honest guys all along! ...Funny 'bout that.). But, behind it all there's a few of these German guys who fear something - and they have long-range plans to keep themselves in charge forever or at least for as long as. And these guys are a lot lot smarter than you could ordinarily suppose based on what you might typically observe about humanity - and they are quite capable of putting one face on for the chief accountants and clerks of the Singapore government, or for the Eurasia Group, or for the Atlantic Council, and they are quite another thing alone in private among themselves. They are... ...meta-schemically unstable. LOL
AND THEN ON ANOTHER HAND (you thought I'd forgotten about that), they have deep personal philosophies rooted in the days of mid-18th Century Europe and Germany, even later on as well to the late-19th Century and tiny tightly secretive inner circles of German philosophical fraternal groups. These formalized mindsets are crystallized in some of the more bizarre schools of European psychology (and now, certainly, American and English as well of course).
Princess Charlene (pronounced 'Char-laine') waved the starting flag an hour ago to signal the start of this year's (2019) Vingt-Quartre Heures du Mans (25 hours of Le Mans) endurance motor-car race.
The weather is currently fine enough, if a little cloudy and I am looking forward to another long night of silly noisy nonsense during which we'll see the latest V-12 Astons roaring up the straight at the Mulsanne Circuit, and Charlie Martin in the BMW Judd M3...
...Charlie, as you all know, being the first trans-gendered race driver to compete in the race. That's Charlie, pronounced Char-lee.
I'm posting this article for some friends around the place and also for all of those who read here and are moved to ponder on the hypotheses on their own. When you read media articles and 'news' in which the phrase 'science' is used - or anything like 'scientifically based,' or 'proved by science' and so on - I think it pays to be aware that for those of us who are deep conspiracy theorists(!) consider that there is a deliberate legal use of the word (and phrases) going on there.
One-time Head of MI6, on the left there.
There is a legal standard for the use of calling upon 'science' as any kind of evidence for anything. This is called the 'Rye-Daubert Standard' and it came into existence in 1923. After 1923 the formal standard was altered and modified several times, the last time being in 1993. It is my view that the standards suffer from genuine, serious deficiencies. And that these have been 'allowed' in there deliberately. They are designed to deceive, and to mislead, and to exploit people's ignorance for malevolence and someone's illegitimate gain. Consequently, you cannot rely on anything - billed as contemporary science - widely spread about, and in the media certainly, as being something you can take for granted as really having been proven anywhere at anytime in terms of logic, mathematics, or functioning factual knowledge (which is the real definition of 'science.').
What are these guys? Politicians, lawyers, scientists...?
...Because when challenged they will always default to 'having obeyed' the legalistic standard for the introduction of 'scientific evidence' as their unarguable defense, and con you (and if not you now, then certainly the ignorant general public) into assuming this is the same thing as actual scientific proof; it's no more than an admissible allegation - if you can put it in those terms. The fact is, by manipulating the process into simply an exploitable political tool, it's no longer science at all, in reality. They have utterly hi-jacked the word and its authentic meaning.