It's Still Oil

The two big media stories right now, certainly ahead of Brexit and 'the Wall,' are the uprisings in France and in Venezuela.

On the surface Macron himself made the problems there to do with the rising prices of fuel in France, prices he himself raised in the form of extra taxes. However the reality is that behind the scenes he is a representative of the interests that deposed Muamar Gaddafi in Libya in order to steal the oil fields there - he is really nothing more or less than a continuation of the Sarkozy 'government,' Sarkozy being someone who has literally been formally CHARGED with corruption and receiving bribes and illegal funds from the 'new' Libyan oil companies. 

They say this guy on the left, Abdul Benalla, was the personal
bodyguard of Macron, but I say, although he is a brutal killer, he is
an executive of the 'new' Libyan/French oil company PetroPlus Overseas

And in Venezuela it was always well-known that whichever 'side' got their hands on the government there, they would use the cash from petroleum sales (Venezuela does have some refining facilities) to establish themselves as some kind of long term ruling elite.

The fact which should be noted is that Venezuela has THE LARGEST PROVEN oil reserves in the world at around 300 billion barrels, which is larger than the reserves of Saudi Arabia.

One needs to be mindful that the American CIA was always extremely well-aware of all of this and I'm afraid it just is the obvious truth that it was the CIA itself, and not any 'Russians' who enabled the rise to the Presidency of Donald J. Trump. And now they have attained control of Venezuela.

I'm going to have to be a bit brutal and 'honest' here, albeit this is likely not going to stay up very long.

Robert Mueller is a backstop provision if not indeed a probable attempt at a coup to force back into power and authority, 'the Clinton' cartel and you can see, if you take a line through John Brennan and the corporate and private banking money laundering career of James Comey when he was at HSBC - that the Clinton DNC was always funded by the Middle Eastern floating Petrodollar cartel interests, which consist of the largely politicallly unseated Arab wealthy elites who still have simply massive continuous cash inflows from oil revenues since the oil wealth in Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia is distributed along tribal lines, and not actual 'government ownership' lines.

And what do we have instead, from the BBC? We have a heavily -
and obviously - photo-shopped pic allegedly sourced from Reuters,
appearing to show a hundred million bazillion 'red scarf' supporters
of Macron in three different 'mashed together' streets...!
This is what we get nowadays, from the BBC.

Robert Mueller seems to have TWO guns pointed at his head, frankly, though, if what I am 'suggesting' is the case in reality: one from the Clinton/Arab side if he fails, and one from the CIA which is provisioned to see to it that he does fail...

Now... when I say 'gun at his head...' 

Anyway let's try very hard to leave off all of this (except that the news will deny me, I think) and move on to more happy thoughts.

Unusual Phrasing

The recently made public indictments by the Grand Jury (wow, that sounds amazing...) selected by the Mueller Special Counsel's Office, of the Republican political operative Roger Stone, contains the phrase 'friend in the Embassy' and implies in those indictments due to the following-on logic regarding the contents of Wikileaks' release of Hillary Clinton and John Podesta emails - that this 'friend in the Embassy' means Julian Assange.

Now, in context of present circumstances 'friend on the Embassy grounds' or 'property' or 'friend residing in the Embassy' probably does mean Julian Assange - however the shady phrase 'our friend at the Embassy' or a 'friend in the Embassy' is code for 'a friend in the Embassy...'

Which Embassy? The Russian Embassy?
Why should we assume the Ecuadorian Embassy...?

And this has a very specific meaning in the world of diplomatic multi-speak: it means a designated individual person, authorized to convey very strategic information from the very top of an outside country or from so close to that top that it has a lot of authoritative meaning and power, and might be true when other people don't want it (the information) to be. It certainly does not mean Julian Assange; because in the first place Julian Assange was not ever and is not the actual source of any true information, he was the overseer and virtual editor of other people's information-gathering. He was in no position to say for sure whether or not something really was true, only that he believed the way something was sourced was reliable and therefore what it yielded was likely to be true.

Nobody ever disputed that the emails containing details exposing some particular Podesta individual to possible distasteful child sex activities, or Hillary Clinton to massive rampaging fraud and criminal corruption, were in any way other than absolutely accurate and true extracts or actual archived files. The whole entire proposition from the very start even with respect to simple social media rumor at the time, was that somehow the (Russian government) FSB possessed real and totally accurate and complete details of goings-on inside the Obama/Clinton Administration and the DNC - and that it was material to be relied upon because it had the sanction of the Kremlin, really. That is certainly how it was pumped in the media by people like Roger Stone.

See this is code...

It's possible that Robert Mueller wants to imply that Julian Assange is a Russian agent and operative. Of course that would never fly on account of the extensive 'handling' files in the CIA... LOL

And I am telling you and you might as well take it as coming from a friend somewhere not a hundred miles from Langley Virginia, too.

The Grand Jury is composed of 23 people, 12 of whom are required to accept that there is an allowable basis for the Special Counsel to make an accusation in the form of a legal indictment.

So Roger Stone has been accused in a legal form, of lying about his relationship to someone - 'a friend in the Embassy' (literally the phrase used in the indictment) - who was going to confirm certain details rumored to exist in email archive files of communications from Hillary Clinton, and John Podesta, among others.

Robert Mueller's 'investigation' is going nowhere. And that has become very clear.

New 'Q' Pass-code is 'Sentinel.'

'Q' - this thing called 'Q,' this phenomenon that has a bunch of followers who say that 'Q' represents someone on the inside who secretively tells us all who are on the outside, about what to 'know' and what to focus on - has gone quiet recently, and 'I suggest' will be staying relatively quiet for at least three months until whatever is going to happen in Venezuela and France just happens and the cops will go running around looking for the usual suspects...

A beautiful brasserie in Paris

I mean if you really want to know know who to keep an eye on that is in the public sphere who has direct access to the real authentic 'Q' team now, and who will give out adequate factual and verifiable or verified information above and beyond what the utterly criminally insane media does - here are the names, bearing in mind that all or most will be involved in misdirection occasionally for the needs of safety and prudence:

Dr Steve Pieczenik
General Stanley McChrystal (in hindsight - being an exact science - all will be clearer...)
Me, I suppose
Daniel Ivanjisski
Bill Shine
Lee Stranahan
...and there are one or two others, mostly basic reporter/foot-soldiers

It doesn't take 'Blind Freddie' to know that right now, we are in a phase where not only has there already been severe violence and deaths in places like France and Venezuela, but that violence could start to take on a different tone and mean that anyone who talks about it beforehand, might have to answer questions afterwards. And so I will not be speculating hereabouts on that set of things that we don't know, or that we could not possibly know, or that we don't even know that we don't know. 

And believe me, if you think this pic will
stay up forever, forget it! At least, focus on his
'Ascot tie' aka 'cravat.'

They 'Know,' See...

Well, they think they do.

The reason people in power regularly fail to employ what appears to the rest of us as ordinary common sense, is because they are quite certain they have access to information we simply do not get. And that we will never get.

And you can't ever prise that notion from their heads. That is the reason why that 'friend' I told you about in the last article, failed to mention that I had warned him about the 'trajectory' of his boss and of the economy he was embedded in - even after things had happened as I suggested they probably would...

The media is showing you ONLY the one side of the story -
where it appears the 'police' have a lot of power and use a lot of force...

He's not interested in having anyone or anything challenge the supremacy of his own 'inside run' on things. He knows, you don't and whenever you ever got stuff right it was a co-incidence. 

He's not stupid... You see there's the real problem - he really is not stupid. He does have inside information - and those on that inside really are connected and they do have a bunch of power and they control a lot of stuff.

Just this last say, um, around four or five weeks, I've been noticing that quite a few people I know in the upscale products/upscale marketing world, have been stymied by what has been going on in Paris.They don't want to talk about it, and they don't quite yet know what to say about it if they are pressed. 

Macron doesn't give a hang about it. He is literally going to preside over the destruction of Paris as both a tourist destination, as well as a center of luxury fashion - shoes, shirts, suits, everything.

Macron, and all the rest of the people 'on the inside' know exactly what they think they are doing, and that they will now, as well as later, profit from the whole exercise.

Who will you be betting on? Because it is now all just a gamble.

The UK's richest man - Jim Ratcliffe - has left the country (in the case of that situation there) for good, for Monaco. He's made a judgement call already and placed his bets.

Real, Practical Value

I doubt there are all that many kids who come by here and read, although I had a few parents - a long while ago - say that this was one of the sites they let their teenagers visit... Interesting.

I try to stay away from complaining - or moaning, which a lot of us old people do (I think I can outrun Carl Lewis today, all the same, and he's supposed to be around my age...). Let's face it , there's a lot to moan about, if you've experienced a lot of good things that have left the public sphere now.

The point is, kids - don't assume things are what they are presented to you as being, and listen to us oldies who will tell you, they can be a lot different, and a lot better.

This is real Cheshire, UK - where the football millionaires have
their mansions. It's a bloody damn cold place in Winter.

One of the facets of 'fake news' is that often, it is not outright fake but twisted in such a way that it is dangerously deceptive.

This week an array of reports about London shops' Christmas sales figures came out in the media. Apart from Tesco, it seemed - well, in fact, it was the case, that the major London upscale retailers and galleries and boutiques, reported significant drops in overall sales compared to the previous Christmas.

But I will tell you these statements and figures reveal nothing about what was going on. You see, for one thing, you need to remove the words 'shop' and 'sales' and 'selling' from everything you are being told. London has considerably improved its visual appearance since I was there for any length of time - the boutiques in Mayfair and Belgravia Square and Knightstbridge, and the shops and buildings are all clean on the outside, and the pavements appear new and the streets and roads are recently laid and clean. There are not that many people who walk in those streets these days, although there are still a few people sauntering around 'window-shopping' around Christmas.

London - the economy of, and all the 'upper bracket' elites who hang around the place - is exclusively about falsified property values...

The reason women go into designer boutiques by prior arrangement and introduction only, in order to be shown a Birkin bag, is because they are the wives and 'friends' of the property owners, there to nod and wink about the last tranche of debt they stole from a bank across the theory of an ever-rising London property valuation. And all the accountants go along with the racket and so do the lawyers and especially the local politicians - so much so that up until this year, they falsified 'sales' of cards and socks and pretended the shops there actually were in business to sell anything.

This is a private lounge at the Ritz (hotel, not casino), owned
by an Emirati guy - no MI5/MI6 people allowed!

Now if you don't believe me, let me apprise you of the latest 'trend' in upscale/designer/luxury/high fashion whatever, brands: they have 'shops' at which no one buys anything, but you can hang out and do 'Instagram' about the brand...

Don't kid yourself these people are really interested in 'networking' and amassing numbers of 'followers' on their Instagram pages for some purpose of 'sales' of 'product' later on down the track. There wasn't any 'later on down the track' twenty years ago, and there isn't one now. They don't have any products. They're in the racket of engineering extractions of cash from debt. A concrete brick, is, after the support and backing from all the Freemasons in the world - more important, more valuable, more costly, and hence better security at a bank - than any other thing in the whole entire world since the Dawn of Time.

Eat, Drink, and Be Merry - for Tomorrow... Oh yes, it is coming. The stage is being set as we speak, for the Godallmightiest Crash of all time from which there can be no recovery. They have lost the mindset that was to do with genuine cash flows and sales. And they cannot manufacture, design or create anything; they have no production ability, left. They have simulacrum copying tendencies.

What did I tell you, right here, on these pages, a few years ago? I have visions of myself running through a cold dark evening across the square outside the city Research Library, a red silk-lined cloak flitting in the wind, a stack of books under my arm - to which I will now add: a USB vault stick in my pocket, and a digital wallet filled with actual currency that buys real things from genuine vendors, and an encrypted list of those vendors and where they hide.

You all don't believe me, do you? Okay then you stick your money into London property and see what happens. Or you leave it in trusts and funds and 'hedge' things that 're-invest' the pooled capital into London Real Estate... I once said to a senior funds manager of Robert Holmes a' Court, then Australia's wealthiest person - 'take all your cash out of your wallet, John, and give it to me.'

Harris Tweed - woven in a craft mill, under the roof of the
person who wove it, and who lives right there. 

He didn't. Three months later his boss was dead and apparently, from all accounts, technically bankrupt at the moment he died. He has spoken to me again, that guy, but he never remembered what I had told him. And that was because there still have been many 'chances' since then till now to survive. But that saga is finished. So now I'm telling you, in no uncertain terms, quite explicitly - get out of cash, get out of your banks (they're all tied to London property), get out of shares and bonds, get out of property trusts, and start to understand what digital crypto-currencies are. And don't pretend that you know or that your 'rational scepticism' has given you a sensible picture of the field. And don't think you know what the complete picture is, of the global digital communications infrastructure - that it is 'only' what is known to governments...

It costs around one hundred UK pounds today for a decent steak dinner in the City of London. And it costs 30,000 pounds for a lady's handbag. And you can believe that if you want, too.

I mean you can be a bloody fool if you want, but the show is over. And it ain't coming back. Not now, not soon, not ever. I understand a bomb went off tonight showering Paris with Macaroons. Did I get that word right... Not sure.