Well don't ever forget I told you first.
The 'extract' from the Russian book I posted as a free downloadable PDF SPECIFIED London Secret Service involvement in all of this.
There is a ton of literally 'fake news' or, more properly, deliberate propaganda being pushed on-line and even in the conventional print media at the moment, trying to so-called 'walk back' the Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel's revelation regarding a possible FBI 'mole' inside the Trump Campaign.
The thrust of this 'walk-back' is that there were 'unwitting sources' within the Trump Campaign, and those being named are of course Carter Page, but also George Papadopoulos - but this is simply not the case at all. There definitely was a real mole, at least one, and that person is 'being rumored across the Web' as Stefan Halper, an associate of the one-time Chief of the UK Secret Intelligence Service aka 'MI6' - Sir Richard Dearlove.
To some extent I am personally extremely gratified that being one of those who have kept the embargo rule to do with the basis document from which the extract I posted was taken, Robert Mueller has found himself floundering somewhat for want of 'the fire.' Or maybe 'the light...'
Soon enough Mueller will be completely shut down.
And then I will freely reveal the document in question. The assistance this kind of document can be to you, or to someone who cares about what they are doing, is that through the lens it provides you, your enemies will be revealed. And when you know your enemy and where they go hunting, you can stay away from that part of the forest, especially once the fight-to-the-death begins between the top-line predators. Which it will. In fact, it's already begun, has it not?!
Sunday, 13 May 2018
Saturday, 12 May 2018
Blend 17
And then comes the time when you are able to purchase your own personal 'first Rolls Royce.'
Suddenly you see that the truly rich, the truly self-reliant and self-made - are not merely unique people but they are also very often alone, or at least kind of 'lonely.'
You will observe how selfish the experience of buying and owning your first Rolls Royce really is. I mean, sure, there are a lot of short videos on YouTube that appear to show people who own them, or things similar to them, but there is something missing from the statements being made in all those videos about the actual experience, which is namely, the sheer personal and very lonely nature of the experience. You can't really share the actual experience itself in the sense of the commonality of feelings except to someone else who is doing the same thing at the exact same time...
And you know, there are a lot of people who wouldn't even like or at all appreciate owning the thing in the first place. My wife's aunt forced her husband to send back the Rolls he bought because she thought it was far too pretentious a thing to own - now bearing in mind this is a fellow who owns an authentic Da Vinci or Michelangelo painting...! ...I'm never sure which and I don't ask.
Who can share this experience, this frustration and inability to explain the feelings involved to the rest of society which simply just does not understand?
Pure luxury and self-indulgence at these supreme levels re things only you and I fully comprehend - let me show 'us:'
Yesterday, arriving somewhat late to 'the party' to do with it, I opened a small glass jar of Blend 17. I got it at a deep discount of retail price '99 cents' from another multi multi millionaire friend-of-mine, Tony Galati, at his huge market in Wanneroo - 'the Spud Shed.'
It's got this ultra premium dusky rose/white gold-and-black packaging around it, but the actual container itself is in all other respects the same as the normal glass jar of Vegemite.
Now in the first place, you have to be one of the tiny global minority of people who actually love this item - the usual way of imbibing it being on toast slathered with melting golden, real, full-salted butter.
What an amazing, unique luxury sensation! It's like molten... molten... molten... black liquid silk enriched with many mysterious strange vitamins, and ...salt.
He he he he he ha ha ha ha haaaaaargh! No one else will ever understand; 'except me and thee, and I'm not even certain about thee.'
Suddenly you see that the truly rich, the truly self-reliant and self-made - are not merely unique people but they are also very often alone, or at least kind of 'lonely.'
 |
| It's all just for you. The rich lifestyle is a lonely experience; basically, it's just you. |
You will observe how selfish the experience of buying and owning your first Rolls Royce really is. I mean, sure, there are a lot of short videos on YouTube that appear to show people who own them, or things similar to them, but there is something missing from the statements being made in all those videos about the actual experience, which is namely, the sheer personal and very lonely nature of the experience. You can't really share the actual experience itself in the sense of the commonality of feelings except to someone else who is doing the same thing at the exact same time...
And you know, there are a lot of people who wouldn't even like or at all appreciate owning the thing in the first place. My wife's aunt forced her husband to send back the Rolls he bought because she thought it was far too pretentious a thing to own - now bearing in mind this is a fellow who owns an authentic Da Vinci or Michelangelo painting...! ...I'm never sure which and I don't ask.
Who can share this experience, this frustration and inability to explain the feelings involved to the rest of society which simply just does not understand?
Pure luxury and self-indulgence at these supreme levels re things only you and I fully comprehend - let me show 'us:'
Yesterday, arriving somewhat late to 'the party' to do with it, I opened a small glass jar of Blend 17. I got it at a deep discount of retail price '99 cents' from another multi multi millionaire friend-of-mine, Tony Galati, at his huge market in Wanneroo - 'the Spud Shed.'
It's got this ultra premium dusky rose/white gold-and-black packaging around it, but the actual container itself is in all other respects the same as the normal glass jar of Vegemite.
Now in the first place, you have to be one of the tiny global minority of people who actually love this item - the usual way of imbibing it being on toast slathered with melting golden, real, full-salted butter.
What an amazing, unique luxury sensation! It's like molten... molten... molten... black liquid silk enriched with many mysterious strange vitamins, and ...salt.
He he he he he ha ha ha ha haaaaaargh! No one else will ever understand; 'except me and thee, and I'm not even certain about thee.'
Tuesday, 8 May 2018
La Plenitude
Here is some Australian music for you:
Well, actually, it is a collaborative effort between the lyricist and (American) singer, and the musical arranger and composer who goes by the commercial name of 'Elypsis' (happens to be a young Australian fellow).
Any American-Australian cultural link-up has the chance of some quite harmonic characteristics: both places are departures from the squandered British Empire, remnants of the types of people and personalities from that modern culture, mixed up with the very ancient and ineffable features of indigenous cultures (Aboriginal in one case, and American Indian in the other). I don't think the end results are 'all mixed up,' but rather they do find unique ways of blending the very old with the recent.
And of course, when we speak of British, we speak of Europe too; of 'Roman Civilization...'
'Plenitude' is the French expression used these days among the Champagne cognoscenti, to describe the three waves of 'fullness' in the aging of Champagne wine - I mean I would personally definitely use the same word for something like the mighty Penfolds Grange (a red wine), which also goes through these phases where the wine is said to be 'closed' and doesn't completely render its fullness of flavor potential.
And I think we might do well to consider cultures such as the American, and the Australian, in a similar light to do with times and phases: we are, in my estimation, at the very beginning of a great Second Age of the post-British Empire 'modern' culture.
On the one hand, living as an intellectual inside either of the American or the Australian culture is a highly isolated thing - there is a total lack of intelligence and thoughtfulness in both places, among the presumed 'leading edges' of society. There were early shoots in Australia during the time of Don Dunstan and Gough Whitlam and these were vigorously and quickly destroyed by both Left and Right sides of the political spectrum.
Where the 'destroyers' got things wrong - which they inevitably always do when it comes to these huge questions of great historic Epochs, really - is that they never themselves understood or fully grasped what the underlying economics of their cultures were all about. As indeed the modern Chinese will now also soon discover, that they too, are lacking in fundamental wisdom about economics.
And you can see this in recent idiotic remarks by people like Warren Buffet - who for years and years I told everyone I knew, was always but only living on the wisdom donated him by his early mentor, the great Benjamin Graham. Buffett recently called Bitcoins 'rat poison to the tenth power squared...' Or something like that.
This is just resentment speaking, it's not intelligence. And let me be the first person you ever heard say that Buffett is not now nor was he ever, quite the brilliant genius that everyone else makes him out to be...
The Bitcoin is unquestionably, at least it is in my mind anyway, because of its characteristic revolutionary, walk-away-from-tradition, very Australian vibe - the invention and creation, as indeed the current mythology is - of an Australian, some guy who called himself 'Satoshi' and who has disappeared off the planet. More or less.
The trouble with all those who want to decry digital cryptocurrency is that they fail to examine that it is functioning as money in the most ancient traditional way there is: namely, people use it in accordance with the obtaining technology of the day. And the obtaining technology is not paper, nor roads, nor buildings - it is electronics and iPhones and other similar gadgets.
Spears, boomerangs, woomeras - mollusk shell and paper-bark money. Buildings and vaults - gold bricks and piles of paper.
iPhones and USB vaults - digital transaction tokens. Period. Bank it. It ain't happening any other way, sorry Warren. All money is rat poison, anyway; that's one of its standard definitions. Warren Buffett is an idiot. It's a waste of time listening to people like him - he's fixated about himself and about the past, which has moved by and gone now. Is he still rich? It simply doesn't matter. He will never be wealthy in tomorrow's world. He will be a constant loser, if he indeed even lives on for a few more years.
Well, actually, it is a collaborative effort between the lyricist and (American) singer, and the musical arranger and composer who goes by the commercial name of 'Elypsis' (happens to be a young Australian fellow).
Any American-Australian cultural link-up has the chance of some quite harmonic characteristics: both places are departures from the squandered British Empire, remnants of the types of people and personalities from that modern culture, mixed up with the very ancient and ineffable features of indigenous cultures (Aboriginal in one case, and American Indian in the other). I don't think the end results are 'all mixed up,' but rather they do find unique ways of blending the very old with the recent.
And of course, when we speak of British, we speak of Europe too; of 'Roman Civilization...'
'Plenitude' is the French expression used these days among the Champagne cognoscenti, to describe the three waves of 'fullness' in the aging of Champagne wine - I mean I would personally definitely use the same word for something like the mighty Penfolds Grange (a red wine), which also goes through these phases where the wine is said to be 'closed' and doesn't completely render its fullness of flavor potential.
 |
| 'P2' - a second plenitude Dom Perignon (about 14 years old) |
And I think we might do well to consider cultures such as the American, and the Australian, in a similar light to do with times and phases: we are, in my estimation, at the very beginning of a great Second Age of the post-British Empire 'modern' culture.
On the one hand, living as an intellectual inside either of the American or the Australian culture is a highly isolated thing - there is a total lack of intelligence and thoughtfulness in both places, among the presumed 'leading edges' of society. There were early shoots in Australia during the time of Don Dunstan and Gough Whitlam and these were vigorously and quickly destroyed by both Left and Right sides of the political spectrum.
Where the 'destroyers' got things wrong - which they inevitably always do when it comes to these huge questions of great historic Epochs, really - is that they never themselves understood or fully grasped what the underlying economics of their cultures were all about. As indeed the modern Chinese will now also soon discover, that they too, are lacking in fundamental wisdom about economics.
And you can see this in recent idiotic remarks by people like Warren Buffet - who for years and years I told everyone I knew, was always but only living on the wisdom donated him by his early mentor, the great Benjamin Graham. Buffett recently called Bitcoins 'rat poison to the tenth power squared...' Or something like that.
 |
| In the modern world you have to specialize in intellectual isolationism |
This is just resentment speaking, it's not intelligence. And let me be the first person you ever heard say that Buffett is not now nor was he ever, quite the brilliant genius that everyone else makes him out to be...
The Bitcoin is unquestionably, at least it is in my mind anyway, because of its characteristic revolutionary, walk-away-from-tradition, very Australian vibe - the invention and creation, as indeed the current mythology is - of an Australian, some guy who called himself 'Satoshi' and who has disappeared off the planet. More or less.
The trouble with all those who want to decry digital cryptocurrency is that they fail to examine that it is functioning as money in the most ancient traditional way there is: namely, people use it in accordance with the obtaining technology of the day. And the obtaining technology is not paper, nor roads, nor buildings - it is electronics and iPhones and other similar gadgets.
Spears, boomerangs, woomeras - mollusk shell and paper-bark money. Buildings and vaults - gold bricks and piles of paper.
iPhones and USB vaults - digital transaction tokens. Period. Bank it. It ain't happening any other way, sorry Warren. All money is rat poison, anyway; that's one of its standard definitions. Warren Buffett is an idiot. It's a waste of time listening to people like him - he's fixated about himself and about the past, which has moved by and gone now. Is he still rich? It simply doesn't matter. He will never be wealthy in tomorrow's world. He will be a constant loser, if he indeed even lives on for a few more years.
Saturday, 5 May 2018
For My Friend Bill
I have plowed, desperately, around and around the internet, to find a pic somewhere, of the absolutely correct formation of the tuxedo protocol actually on someone.
There are one or two - not more than that - photographs which are indistinct in key sections, and which could possibly show someone wearing a tuxedo correctly, or, that is to say, the absolutely totally correct form of this particular attire; but as I say, these photos are indistinct and may not in reality be the real thing. Samuel L. Jackson has a photo that is perfect as long as one concedes those areas that are not distinct in the pic itself. But otherwise, his tie, his lack of collar gap, and a range of other elements, are all perfect.
And this is quite at a distance from what has become commonplace now.
Not even Connery's Bond ever fully complied with tuxedo etiquette at its absolute peak of ordinary formal tradition. His beautiful white jacket iteration is totally acceptable but it is a form of 'sea rig' evening dress, meant for hotter climates, and not exactly a standard tuxedo.
If you ever consulted those 'style guides' you will come across this kind of phrase: 'usually there are no side-pockets but if you have them...' What is this 'but if you...' thing all the time? ...How about just don't.
And so, rather surprisingly, you could think, the one person who carried it off as close to complete perfection as is required by the etiquette, was Pierce Brosnan!
He wears the correct attire, of: off-white or ice-white shirt with placket-covered buttons, no side pockets on the jacket, no vents, peak lapels, grosgrain SQUARE EDGED bow-tie, proper french cuffs, jacket single-buttoned in front. And on one occasion he wore the birds-eye buttoned shirt version. One stripe 'galon' down the sides of the trousers. Black patent pumps.
All correct.
Nothing else is 'correct.'
And there are significant reasons why someone of genuine breeding and class must adhere to the virtues of the absolutely conventional, strict traditional format, for wearing a tuxedo.
...I have to run along in a second to go to a show in the city, and so, I shall pick this all up after a few hours, and revisit things and complete this little post. For now, remember the old adage. You know, any old adage.
: )
Okay anyway, so now I'm back...
So what's the point of 'tuxedo etiquette?' The tuxedo was invented by Griswold Lorillard - now don't let anyone pretend things are otherwise! The story they trot out now about James Potter is a fabrication designed to cover up a social indiscretion, which we cannot go into here - and even though I have made a habit recently of committing the crime of revealing state secrets, I shall stop at revealing the promiscuous incidents to do with, or the habits of, members of authentic society. Anyway, Potter's ex-wife Cora Brown, became a famous actress who played the Comtesse De Winter on stage in The Three Musketeers.
The Lorillards were not only moguls of tobacco, but the younger Lorillard brothers were among the two or three really large tea merchants in the United States at the time, owning at least 40 ships at sea transporting tea. Consequently, the Lorillards were personally known to one of my own ancestors, a certainly particular lady, who owned the largest, and the fastest clippers ever to sail; ever. Her half-sister was the very famous Princesse de Caraman Chimay, Clara Ward.
Now there is a great secret about tuxedo etiquette, and no amount of purchasing of mansions on Lake Como next to the actor George Clooney, will ever give one access to such inner knowledge.
So yes you can fiddle around with exact specifications for tuxedo etiquette, but don't do it.
Tuxedos are not about conformity or conservatism at all - after all, they were a departure from the standards of the day when they were first shown. And the fact that we maintain the exact same specifications to correctly wear (Elizabeth Barrett Browning split infinitives often, so shall I) tuxedos even now, has nothing to do with conformity or having a conservative mentality necessarily.
You can go surfing all you like, disporting your buff torso to all the eligible ladies to your heart's content. And they say that attending a British Public School attaches an automatic brand of status and supposed class to a young person. But this is the very soul and meaning of the nouveau riche - for neither are these people from actual aristocratic society when there really was such a thing in Great Britain, nor are they honest about the sources of what appears to be 'their money' now, and certainly, these are the strata who have absolutely no clue at all about why men of genuine substance and worth stick to exact specifications when donning the attire known as 'the tuxedo.' Sven Raphael Schneider the style guru goes around the bull's eye closest of anyone, but even he refrains from publicly going deeply into the real lore of it.
There are one or two - not more than that - photographs which are indistinct in key sections, and which could possibly show someone wearing a tuxedo correctly, or, that is to say, the absolutely totally correct form of this particular attire; but as I say, these photos are indistinct and may not in reality be the real thing. Samuel L. Jackson has a photo that is perfect as long as one concedes those areas that are not distinct in the pic itself. But otherwise, his tie, his lack of collar gap, and a range of other elements, are all perfect.
 |
| Completely perfect tuxedo style |
And this is quite at a distance from what has become commonplace now.
Not even Connery's Bond ever fully complied with tuxedo etiquette at its absolute peak of ordinary formal tradition. His beautiful white jacket iteration is totally acceptable but it is a form of 'sea rig' evening dress, meant for hotter climates, and not exactly a standard tuxedo.
If you ever consulted those 'style guides' you will come across this kind of phrase: 'usually there are no side-pockets but if you have them...' What is this 'but if you...' thing all the time? ...How about just don't.
And so, rather surprisingly, you could think, the one person who carried it off as close to complete perfection as is required by the etiquette, was Pierce Brosnan!
 |
| You like this, Billy, Billy, Billy-Baru...? (Paraphrasing Ted Knight in 'Caddyshack'). |
He wears the correct attire, of: off-white or ice-white shirt with placket-covered buttons, no side pockets on the jacket, no vents, peak lapels, grosgrain SQUARE EDGED bow-tie, proper french cuffs, jacket single-buttoned in front. And on one occasion he wore the birds-eye buttoned shirt version. One stripe 'galon' down the sides of the trousers. Black patent pumps.
All correct.
Nothing else is 'correct.'
And there are significant reasons why someone of genuine breeding and class must adhere to the virtues of the absolutely conventional, strict traditional format, for wearing a tuxedo.
...I have to run along in a second to go to a show in the city, and so, I shall pick this all up after a few hours, and revisit things and complete this little post. For now, remember the old adage. You know, any old adage.
: )
Okay anyway, so now I'm back...
So what's the point of 'tuxedo etiquette?' The tuxedo was invented by Griswold Lorillard - now don't let anyone pretend things are otherwise! The story they trot out now about James Potter is a fabrication designed to cover up a social indiscretion, which we cannot go into here - and even though I have made a habit recently of committing the crime of revealing state secrets, I shall stop at revealing the promiscuous incidents to do with, or the habits of, members of authentic society. Anyway, Potter's ex-wife Cora Brown, became a famous actress who played the Comtesse De Winter on stage in The Three Musketeers.
The Lorillards were not only moguls of tobacco, but the younger Lorillard brothers were among the two or three really large tea merchants in the United States at the time, owning at least 40 ships at sea transporting tea. Consequently, the Lorillards were personally known to one of my own ancestors, a certainly particular lady, who owned the largest, and the fastest clippers ever to sail; ever. Her half-sister was the very famous Princesse de Caraman Chimay, Clara Ward.
 |
| A gown by Worth, owned by the sister of Clara Ward |
Now there is a great secret about tuxedo etiquette, and no amount of purchasing of mansions on Lake Como next to the actor George Clooney, will ever give one access to such inner knowledge.
So yes you can fiddle around with exact specifications for tuxedo etiquette, but don't do it.
Tuxedos are not about conformity or conservatism at all - after all, they were a departure from the standards of the day when they were first shown. And the fact that we maintain the exact same specifications to correctly wear (Elizabeth Barrett Browning split infinitives often, so shall I) tuxedos even now, has nothing to do with conformity or having a conservative mentality necessarily.
You can go surfing all you like, disporting your buff torso to all the eligible ladies to your heart's content. And they say that attending a British Public School attaches an automatic brand of status and supposed class to a young person. But this is the very soul and meaning of the nouveau riche - for neither are these people from actual aristocratic society when there really was such a thing in Great Britain, nor are they honest about the sources of what appears to be 'their money' now, and certainly, these are the strata who have absolutely no clue at all about why men of genuine substance and worth stick to exact specifications when donning the attire known as 'the tuxedo.' Sven Raphael Schneider the style guru goes around the bull's eye closest of anyone, but even he refrains from publicly going deeply into the real lore of it.
Thursday, 3 May 2018
The Spy Book Names David Solomon
Any of you who by now have downloaded the 'free excerpts' PDF from the 'covertly'-sponsored 'Invulnerable Missiles and Extreme Tactical Insertions,' will already have realized that there is probably more to this whole 'Russia collusion' atmosphere in the West than meets the eye.
Certainly there's no collusion between Donald Trump or anyone involved with him, and the Kremlin. That is categorically the truth.
 |
But that is not to say the Kremlin does not know exactly what is going on, and why. They have always known - and that is the specific problem for people like Hillary Clinton and Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller and Sidney Blumenthal and others in that camp. Mueller and Rosenstein and that crowd are all acting out of fear, not anything else. They are deeply inveigled in corruption and aiding in covering it up.
...Now it's going to be very hard to convince those people who have long-held, and cherished beliefs, in some kind of 'Jewish/Zionist' criminal conspiracy, and by virtue of that stance want to thrust everything into the same box. Why I say this is because I am therewith predicating my next statements: Goldman Sachs is not the villain of the piece. What happened was they took advantage of Bill and Hillary Clinton's need for money after the Monica Lewinsky situation took shape - but then, seeing how much money could be made by selling influence, Hillary Clinton went a lot too far!
She didn't sell out to Goldman Sachs - she sold out to everyone! Sure she sold out to the Russians over a number of things. Goldman Sachs facilitated - and resolved - the 'theoretical' moral situation because they already had a role advising in Russian privatizations following the collapse of the Soviet system. The moral position of the US administration regarding selling uranium to Russians who might have been proxies for the Russian government itself - was that this was just an allowable part of the 'privatization' process of formerly State assets, and that technically, anyone could buy into the corporate entities that owned the US-sourced uranium. The part about 'might have been proxies for' was the tricky bit.
Goldman Sachs does not recognize that Russia, or the Russian government, is in any way a problematic partner... What they know inside their closed rooms, is different to what they 'know' when asked for a State-side public view.
Now here's the point you're not going to necessarily like - Goldman Sachs took a firm view, that Barack Obama was a problematical character, and that Hillary Clinton was as well. The top executives inside Goldman Sachs, are some of the people responsible for putting together a US Military shadow secret service that enabled Trump to win.
Now this also means that Goldman Sachs is NOT part of the 'globalist elite/NWO/NATO/Eu' geopolitical phenomenon; although it might look like they do things that align with that group, the reasons they are doing them are not at all shared reasons, and the goals are not shared either. For example, Goldman Sachs London has been shifting all its top layers of staff to Frankfurt, and the business media covers this as due to negative concerns about Brexit - the reality is that Goldman Sachs recognizes London as a source of too much 'interest' in things that are none of their business - Goldman Sachs doesn't want another 'Christopher Steele' to suddenly turn on them and their early involvement in the corruption of Hillary Clinton, as a way of hurting their relationship with today's White House! THAT is why Lloyd Blankfein is 'retiring.' That is why Goldman Sachs is pulling out of London.
(Here is a repeat link to the downloadable PDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uW7p1fk0thQm0LXceAi4mZya20MV3BIz)
There is no possible way you can trust London, and by that I mean the UK Intelligence establishment - they are acting for themselves and no one else. Goldman Sachs has a stunning new profile in Saudi Arabia and this could be a cause of much jealousy in London.
The book 'Invulnerable Missiles...' asserts there is an entirely private, highly organized, and completely 'in the shadows' group that is comprised of higher ranks inside the US Navy and Military Intelligence, as well as some highly-placed bankers such as individuals in places like Goldman Sachs. And the book names David Solomon, as, if not an actual policy-maker and leader of this covert group, then most certainly an active member.
David Solomon will take over as CEO of Goldman Sachs, when Lloyd Blankfein retires and leaves presently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)