Making Money From Delusionocracy

I have known a few politicians over the years. The last ones that I considered were not delusional were in office back in the 1980's.

That's a while ago now.

If you spend your life trying to deceive others, and at some point you forget which bits were lies and which bits not, you could easily end up on the verge of a serious kind of madness.

All of you will know and realise – those of you who bother to follow this blog – that at least for a year now I have been steering away from offering a view on things like Benghazi, or the Boston bombing attack, or Syria, or Bahrain, or Sochi.

And that is because I have known, among other equally vexed matters, all about the present events in The Ukraine and their likelihood of happening; I considered it a very sad situation and not worth my bothering to scream blue bloody murder, well, certainly not from a pathetic little blog-site. Over the last year I have considered it virtually inevitable, and fully-intended by the Western politicians who have the reins of power in our world today.

I am very sure that a while back I made mention of ex-London Met policemen John Yates and his ideas about 'kettling' of protest crowds and the ideology of using force appropriate to the violence of the protesters.

And I am sure I have spent a lot of posts carrying on about various things Russian.

Alena Gorchakova Russian Jewellery

You could say it's just a co-incidence.

A 'Delusionocracy' is a term I just now made up, but I intend it to mean a system in which people actually trade in foolish and obvious frauds but have grown into the habit of accepting them as a sort of meaningful fiction that satisfies them on some schizophrenic emotional level and even grants them a living just like say a pulp fiction writer might eke out.

I say 'eke out' because I have had major doubts for a good long while that all of these people have the purchasing power that the nominal sums of dollars they claim to possess should grant them.

By my sources there are only about five thousand real disposable wealth rich people in the world... And that is far far short of the figure even for the vaunted 'new' class of China market millionaires alone. But I prefer to rely on my own sources – they have proven many times to be more reliable than other data providers.

One of the conclusions of this perspective is that you can make money from the Delusionocracy, although it is problematic. Yet at the same time, the pathway to enabling such profits is clear enough: indulge them in the deceits and delusionary beliefs and ideas that they are addicted to.

Give them more of what, evidently, they want.

Sheepskin = badguy, no wait, gun = badguy

Of course it's difficult for me to do this kind of thing; I can't help but focus on intelligent strategic assessments that have the ring of truth and reality to them. It would be very hard for me to think that Putin is a different kind of person than the one I know. But I suppose the thrill of acting and even dressing, like an olden days sheepskin and ushanka sporting Russian spy, would be a bit of fun. Afterall, I clearly recall sticking something up here about what to eat like Russian spies do, where to hang out, like Russian spies do, and how to quote Dostoevski: 'the ability to add two and two and make it add up to five has its attractions.'

Wait a minute, I never quoted that before. But I will be using it a lot in the near future. It seems to fit into the spirit of the times. Zeitgeist – a German word, of course.

Intelligent strategic analysis would say that the Russians and the Germans are allies though, right now. You mightn't want to believe that. But only if you were deluded into the idea that the Germans love the USA. Or that the Germans forget who the Black Hand, is.

Don't ever think for one minute that Syria and The Ukraine are not linked. And I believe I've covered that before too, in the piece about Mansour Ojeh, the then publicly-known owner of Maclaren Racing (not that he's got anything to do with it, but he is symbolic of the money involved and the circles trailed). I wonder what's going to happen with the Russian Formula One race? Ah well, certainly a place I can wear that old sheepskin anyway. My that will be fun. Wonder if Vanity Fair will take pics. I think I'll get an agent though, before I have to be like Snowden and live all alone and off donations. Lol. 'Look look he's a spy, he looks like one!'

I'll tell you what delusions are – thinking that the Russians have no idea what is going down here and are being reactive. Or, what is NOT going down, in fact, much to the chagrin of someone, somewhere.

It's so fucking ridiculous. Watching the news.

Any newsman with half a brain has a brace of tickets to the Russian Grand Prix come October 12 of this year. I think someone's gonna get knocked off. Someone in a 'hospitality tent' with the big league of super wealthy super powerful people. An appropriate and commensurate use of force, do you not think. I don't have inside knowledge. It just seems so irresistable, given that there was prudent restraint before the bs in Kiev. I'm not sure what moral value would pull Putin back now. I am telling you all, the FSB knows all about who, why, where and when, and did so well before the matter got right out of hand. And common sense tells you that I am right too. So, do you not think Putin has been incredibly, extraordinarily patient and restrained? I mean he knew, same as the NSA knows. Maybe not by the same means seeing as his people go around in sheepskins and ushankas still, apparently. I don't think there's anything that is going to hold him back now and I think there are a few people living in a state of serious delusion if they think the CIA or the NSA or anyone is going to be able to 'protect' them from here on in. For one thing, they are not innocent. Did Berezovsky die? He did. Must have been an accident. I notice John Yates wasn't on hand to give him mouth to mouth. Perhaps his consultancy fee doesn't cover that level of service.

 

Fucking dickheads. The lot of them. People like Yates, with his bigheaded wilfully aggressive attitude dressed up as 'professional' anything, exacerbate and enflame lunatics who have inordinate power in undemocratic places and actually promote violence by using it and subscribing to it. Fucking moronic dickheads. That is the language that these people deserve. They are the people, that are sending your kids to war and to die. Or worse. And they are bugging your house. And they want respect too.

You can make big money in a Delusionocracy. Whether you ever get to spend any of it is another thing.

(I think I'll be taking this down after a short while. But don't forget what I've said.)

 

Calvin J. BEAR (get it?)

The Mysterious Spirit Of Design...

Jason Castriota is a relatively young man still. He was responsible for the design of the current Maserati Gran Turismo, under the Pininfarina Team name.

Jason Castriota

Understandably, I suppose, car design – even great car design – has a tradition of involving some fairly young people. One cannot but help think of Marcello Gandini at the top of a long list – virtually a raw youngster at the time - who penned the amazing Lamborghini Miura.

They say that underlying the technical aspects of architecture is just one single mathematical relationship – it is the one about mass and force.

Fortunately for all those who live intellectual lives in the world today, access to knowledge of the history of design and engineering has never been better! We all can read up on the lives of Juscelino Kubitschek, Paul Ritter, Marcello Gandini, Chelsia Lau, and now, of Jason Castriota as well. Not that one should expect Castriota's best design days to be behind him so that we must only look into, (albeit recent) history.

Expectation of the amazing is something that is not an unreasonable position to hold in the present era, even if it seems unfashionable at the moment. I make a clear separation in my own mind between the nature of the economic policies that we find enacted upon us in the wider sense of national and international or global economics and politics, and what a Da Vinci is doing in the dead of any given night with undertakers as his companions.

Ralfy Mitchell of 'Ralfystuff' on YouTube

Er, well, but then I can point to one certain Ralfy Mitchell – undertaker by profession or trade – who now is far and away the best whisky reviewer and whisky drinker's mentor or guru online and everywhere, really, who gives out his very very regular 'malt marks' on YouTube from inside his cold 'Manx bothy' (a casual temporary dwelling or shelter for farmers and shepherds and so on). What a wonderful fellow he is too. I come from a line of engineers (and warmongers), and I can attest that whisky has some mysterious connection to great engineering. Thought you might want to know or at least consider that, and even to give such a connection a go yourself. That is, after you sleep with your 'Up Bracelet' on all night, and run through the park (or virtual park) with your ReCon Jet augmented reality eyewear on in order to give the ethylene transport in your bloodstream a good clean out. I have absolutely no idea of the scientific basis for any of this, but I do know that I want any excuse, reason, or justification that is readily to hand to watch Ralfystuff on YouTube with a Glencairn glass next to me. You see I think I am still something of an athlete. And so I will require an excuse for all of this.

 

Thanks a lot Ralfy! No Maserati driving for me today. Or tomorrow. Mind you, never ever had a hangover from drinking Jameson's, or James Grant's strangely enough... Wonder why. Hmn, notes of plum pudding, vanilla, prunes and good quality motor oil, you say... Castrol motor oil, perhaps. Or old Burma Lubricating Oil from the Singer Sewing Machine. Know what you mean, Ralfy; I do know what you mean!

Calvin J. Bear

Be Wary Of THIS

There are kinds of conspiracies that fit neatly into the theorizing that goes on more and more nowadays – afterawhile they all seem quite banal though.

And then there are those conspiracies that would likely be utterly meaningless to most people, and yet that have huge negative consequences that are hard to undo once they have been exercised.

A conspiracy is what you call it when several people agree to overcome objective fairness or even previously agreed social standards and rules, in order to benefit themselves at the cost of those who are not in their own small group.

The Guardian Newspaper's photo of the BBC iPhone

Society operates on such complicated bases that sociologists and historians and political scientists and economists have been a long time at deciding what really makes it tick; and they still don't all agree. But all the same, society is larger than a few media chief editors and their unseen Svengalis.

I see a conspiracy.

It is the one whereby people make unilateral decisions about terminologies, and unilateral decisions about meanings to words in common usage. I'm not being jocular here. I really mean it.

By 'unilateral' I mean 'not what the common usage or definition already otherwise is.' I mean that the few and the monolithic overcome the many and the diverse by force and not by logic; 'the few' in this instance being the 'unilateral' part of what I was saying above.

This type of conspiracy has existed in the past and it typically occurs when there is some kind of dictatorship in control and where the leadership goes mad. No one is able to challenge the leadership because of overbalanced sheer power, yet virtually everyone realizes the falseness of the dogma that is being decreed.

Now there are a lot of simple words that the public uses which don't require a lingustic scientist to attest to their 'actual' meaning. The english language being what it is, actually ascribes meanings to words that common speakers also ascribe, and any other donation of meaning has traditionally by english teachers and literate people been called the employment of 'jargon.'

This position is changing, or has indeed already changed perhaps, on account of a tribe of leading people insisting, often or most usually through the media, that they alone give imprimatur upon meanings of things, meanings or words, and just plain meanings fullstop.

And so you will at this minute see the BBC deciding to slip in one definition of the word 'beauty' (such an innocuous thing, you would suppose) when offering to the public that a maths formula is where 'true beauty' resides... And in the instance of the radio version of the story – which appears to indeed have about five variations and guises that it appears under on different websites and locations – it is specifically the formula for the dynamic movement of fluids, that is claimed to be one example, attested by a lady scientist, of sheer and utter true beauty (the formula, that is, not the scientist).

I am not sure why there have come to be so many recent examples in the media of the twisting or misinterpreting of Plato and other ancient philosophers... Beauty is many things and not just one; one facet of something may be imbued with a quality of beauty, but it itself is not 'beauty' per se. Thus it is not 'true beauty.' And never can it be. It is a sensible thing seen through the dark glass of the human senses. That is what Plato actually did say – but here in this recent narrative there is this implication by association of 'maths' into things that the argument just given in the media has the weight of traditional and classical academic thinking. And it certainly does not.

A single maths formula may have the quality of beauty but it is not itself 'beauty.' The whole complicated area that the ancient Greeks went into when they explained what they meant by the purity of beauty, is today mashed up with words like 'pure' and 'austere' and 'perfect' and a lot of other 'extreme' or absolutist words to give you a 'sense' rather than a manifest list describing the standard definition. And it is very dangerous to have people in positions of blanket power, especially media power, start this business of working on people's feelings when they claim that they intend to arrive at specific technical meanings. I always get the feeling then of someone trying to play around with the public's sentiments, and I ask myself why? Maybe it's just a mistake and an accident...

Beauty is a very complicated thing indeed.

2014 Zegna Limited Edition Maserati

For example. Zegna is going to have a go at their idea of a beautiful rendering of the interior of the Maserati Quattroporte this year. Well, you see, it's actually not their idea – because if it were just their idea, the risk is the cars would not sell. No indeed, these vehicles will need to find notes of desire within the hearts and minds of the wealthy buyers that they are in harmony with. It is a public idea of beauty that Zegna will work from. And they mean it to be that.

A premium Champagne manufacturer in France is making a Champagne with deliberate hints of Russian caviar in it, and one could think this is a stupid idea. I don't know; I haven't tried this Champagne. But juxtapositions do work when it comes to art and things of beauty, and it's not even as simple as to say that subtlety is the key. It may not be. Many a great building is brutalist and not subtle at all, and some even combine quite outrageously conflicting themes – a pickle, crystal, steel, open office plans, spiralling motifs – and yet they do work together.

Luvienz 'Caviar' Champagne

No I do not fear the accidental or mistaken gestures in print and media, but the deliberate and shameless and highly-sophisticated high quality types of propaganda.

Oh no, when the establishment thinker starts all this nonsense of measuring the unmeasurable, and determining for you by a scientific method what is 'best' for you – there is something actually serious afoot.

Of course you are quite free to think that media time on the BBC is cheap or free and paid for by the altruistic British citizen and taxpayer who thinks that intellectual wheelspinning by highly-qualified academics is just the thing for any dull afternoon when there is absolutely nothing else going on that could capture the attention of the public or requires to be reported to them since they are the very heart and soul of democracy and have to be served.

Is there something about the maths formula for fluid flow dynamics that can be applied to the flows of money in an economy...? And if so, is it a thing of beauty? And to whom?

Why You Are Alive...

A scientific research study ought to be conducted into whatever is able to be known about the lives and the conditions and pressures they are experiencing immediately prior to when one of these bankers leaps off a tall building.

Dead, and yellow-ed...

In a world where the quantity of money available at a particular interest rate is by command decision suddenly increased virtually limitlessly for all intents and purposes, and the time-honoured rational market dynamics of supply and demand are thus altered irrevocably, changing for all time every single economic proposition of logic and reason – it ought at least to be academically studied what, if any, might be the reasons a banker, of all people, should want to kill themselves.

Certainly, there is the common enough legend of a Superbowl champion, waking up the next morning, with that heavy and showy ring on his finger, a new Lamborghini in the garage downstairs, several empty bottles of champagne beside the feathered bed, a blonde bimbo's high heels left tossed onto the thick pile carpet... And then the sports champion thinking to himself: 'is that all there is?'

What is the everything that people aspire to having anyway?

"Starry starry night."

I am a student of popular culture. Always have been. And somewhat of a fan too. 'Pop' is actually not quite the same thing as what the masses 'want.' 'Popular' is what is widely acclaimed; the masses follow what critics say for all their clamour. The superficiality of real 'pop' is only paper thin, and common perceptions about it are reflections of the mediocrity of the mindsets of the viewers, rather than of the art itself.

One ought to try and accept that today's 'special' banks who have benefitted through the program of quantitative easing, may have replenished or re-stocked long lines of previously depleted liquidity (that they were just now freely given), behind various lists or allocations of assets, let's say, that were dear to their hearts.

And this means that certain assets will not just crumble and disappear in spite of their non-performance frankly, from now on ever after, in terms of profits and revenue.

But none of it has been what you would say is art. And so I thought I might spend a little time on art. Art endows even some horrible things with beauty although it takes a certain outlook to be able to see that. The transformative power of great art is what is needed now to take a fresh look at the world – but I see only those with very great gifts being able to 'see' their own individual way out of the morass; the masses will on the whole never get out now, and in the end few will get out before the tides of history themselves turn quite dramatically. And that is not something on the cards very obviously...

"True Skin"

I am a great fan of style. Style will take you sometimes, to places that not even science can.

There is a tremendous short movie out called “True Skin,” written and directed by Stephan Zlotescu of N1ON Productions, an independent movie-maker that usually specializes in music videos. If you haven't seen it yet it's worth taking a look at.

"True Skin" - beautifully made sci-fi movie short.

Warner Inc. currently have the project in development as a full length feature and one never knows where they'll eventually take the basic story idea, which is as derivative as it also is classical too in the category of sci-fi. On the one hand the whole film short is something like a re-visualisation of Blade Runner, but really, the value of the effort lies in the stylishness of the creative visualisation itself – which is distinctly different from what Blade Runner was.

For one thing there is a certain up-to-the-minute reality about “True Skin,” when it comes to the technology of augmented humans. And there is a real moral tale going there about the seeming spiritual tragedies of 'mere' natural humans when they cannot overcome economic dire straits.

The emotionless expression on the face of the main character hides many conflicting and deep-as-the abyss feelings, and, as someone who has a level 3 (worst kind there is) autistic son, there is a perspective that I have about the ideas in the movie short that we have been able to see thus far: with the amazing computer-device interfaced capabilities of autistic people, it seems to me that autism is almost some kind of advancement that has exploded across the modern world exactly at the same time that highly portable, very advanced digital systems that augment the basic human sense channels and increase the rates and pathways and simultaneous access to data and sensory input.

Also look at the Daft Punk music clip of 'Digital Love'

I know that my son has amazingly deep emotions for a seven year old, much more mature and perceptive and balanced than you would ever suspect a seven year old should be able to intellectually process – but he can. Yet, if you go simply by the facial demeanour, you never could tell any of the signs of these things. All the same, it's almost as if these people (autistic people) quickly come to the conclusion that most 'normal' people are emotionally dumb, emotionally disabled if you like, and they refrain from even trying to communicate with people whose emotional sensitivities are simplistic...

There is a sadness on the face of the lead character in the movie short; at least it seems that way to me.

A sad, tragic future for humans?

I asked my son after watching the film what he thought the character was feeling at the scene toward the end (where I thought he was tremendously sad), and he said, 'he's paralysed by the uncertainty of limitless joy.'

Can you see the future, my friends? It doesn't have the people we have been used to, in it.