Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Thursday, 17 July 2025

When You Are SUPER Rich

Oh man. I tried to stay away from this kind of thing.

Failed.

Beneath it all (what I will say about expensive material things) I really just wanted to comment on how 'psychology' today is just another one of the pursuits that have fallen prey to the Post-War 'Baby Boomer' mentality which never went away since the Sixties.

It used to be that a psychologist had quite a good deal of actual real-life experience, before they were taken seriously. And that is because the profile of human life shows a distinct foolishness exhibited in the youth of most people - not all, but by far most.

She's going to meet 
George Clooney at the 
Nespresso shop to 
solve some mysteries...



What happened of course, was that smart-(ish) kids passed their exams and achieved their necessary grades - but were completely skeptical underneath it all, of what their professors and if not those, then certainly what the traditional written material actually said and taught.

And so then next, they completely undermined and modified the original psychology teachings, so as to accommodate their insanely foolish core internal beliefs held from their youth. With the result that succeeding generations of psychologists and teachers, all started to reflect in the 'standard credentialed narratives' - basically, BS.

There is no way a naive younger person will comprehend the nature of physical love and attraction. Which is not to say there are not extremely 'wise' young people because there are those - but such never will gravitate to any kinds of artificial social environments, of which the University is one of the most extreme!

This whole utter superficial, completely spurious investigation style into complex things occurs across the board. Imperial College London is the leading research institution that has gone into all of this DMT/Ayahuasca - and their main 'finding' is that both of those substances increase the amount of active neural connections...

Ayahuasca also has the unfortunate effect of dangerously increasing blood pressure both systolic and diastolic.

'Increasing the amount of active neural connections' doesn't mean anything. It might just jam-up your brain!

Increasing the connections of important and meaningful neurons and making vesicle threshold firings more efficient, could be valuable, giving rise to actual functional insights.

Coffee, window, thinking
about solving mysteries.



The DB (Designer Brands) fragrance company of Rue Marquatett, Paris, manufactures a range of 'inspired by' perfumes - all of which are substantially better than the 'real' ones made today. The 'real' ones are marketed at anywhere between $400 to $600 or more (!), while the DB versions are from between $15 to $25.

Some of the DB items are made in India, while the rest are made in France. All of them are excellent.

The 'original' Robert Piguet 'Fracas' regarded as a great classic - is nonetheless quite difficult to wear these days, because of the underlying civet and raw tuberose (not a very easy, likable scent at all due to the excess of indoles) notes which are both (as with everything else in it now) completely synthetic. 

The DB 'Chaos' inspired by Fracas, is also quite a challenge.

But if you are a 'frag-head' you will prefer the DB version and you will buy it. This is made in India using the most ancient classical North Indian raw fragrance ingredients supplier's best ingredients.

Angelique.


Chanel Bleu de Chanel is supposedly one of the most highly-regarded (by today's middle classes) men's fragrances. It can sell from $200 to $900 depending on what 'strength' the thing is that you are buying.

DB's 'Blue' is ten times better of a product and costs $18.

Rich people things.
You and me not allowed!
Too exotic.



Also -, to me at least, it contains real, authentic, aged components.

Their 'Santorini Blue' is easily one of the most wearable, most inoffensive office sprays around. Price - $15.

So this is not to say super rich people do not buy actually tremendously expensive fragrances. They do - but they will restrict the use of those to very special occasions where it is likely or at minimum possible, that others might appreciate what it is they own and are wearing.

And they may well in any case use the brands I just mentioned because they are literally that good.

Same if you like expensive watches, or bags (especially the notorious Hermes thing if you are a woman), or pens. Or cars.

The Kuru Toga Dive (and also the Mitsubishi Zento Signature) are the most insanely over-engineered writing instruments in the world. They are also the best.

Casio F91W Terrorist watch.
Stop it, Bill. That is not me.
ASIO are p*ssed enough with us already.


None of these things are 'expensive' by comparison to the brands that the media will tell you are what rich people have and use.

I was trying, very hard, to stay away from talk of expensive luxuries and 'things.' But that ain't gonna work out. LOL

We'll be talking about spending lots and lots of money next few 'episodes.'

Kuru Toga Dive Aurora Purple.
It's just a pencil.

Y'all know that Mickey Spillane wrote a lot of the original Ms Marvel, Batman, Superman, and Captain America comics, right...

'Prepare to meet your Doom Earthlings! Galactus is Coming.' LOL Worthy of him. (I mangled the actual lines).

I won't be going to see the flick but it does have a line in it there that will go down as a great classic, no doubt about it.

Angelique is another one of these trained opera-singers who have jumped across to Trance, in this case it is known as 'Progressive Vocal Trance.'




5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did not know that Spillane wrote for superhero comics. Then it hit me that maybe Stan Lee was trying to emulate Spillane's writing style, so I asked Google A.I.:

    "While there's no direct evidence to suggest Stan Lee consciously tried to mimic Mickey Spillane's writing style, there are some thematic and stylistic overlaps that might be interesting to consider:

    Flawed and relatable heroes: Both Lee and Spillane created protagonists with depth and relatable struggles, moving away from idealized archetypes prevalent in earlier popular fiction. Spillane's Mike Hammer, for instance, is a "vengeful, no-nonsense antihero who operated by his own moral code". Lee, similarly, gave his superheroes human problems and anxieties, like Spider-Man worrying about guilt or homework. He aimed to make his characters relatable by emphasizing the person behind the superhero persona.

    Emphasis on action and pacing: Spillane was known for "slam-bang beginnings" and fast-paced narratives, according to wallacestroby.com. Lee also emphasized momentum and keeping stories moving forward, arguing that every line and panel should drive towards a goal.

    Strong voice and direct engagement: Spillane's style was described as "punchy, provocative, and unforgettable," with a directness that resonated with readers. Lee also developed a distinctive voice and engaged directly with his audience through editor's notes and columns, creating a sense of camaraderie with readers.

    However, there are important differences:

    Genre and target audience: Spillane primarily wrote hard-boiled detective novels, focusing on crime, violence, and moral ambiguity. While Lee explored moral dilemmas in his work, the context and target audience were largely different, with his stories geared towards a younger demographic in the realm of superhero comics.

    Specific stylistic choices: Spillane's prose was lean and direct, while Lee often used a richer vocabulary and incorporated elements like alliteration, according to Black Gate – Adventures in Fantasy Literature.

    In conclusion, while not a direct imitation, Stan Lee's work shared some common ground with Mickey Spillane's writing in terms of character development, pacing, and engaging with the reader, possibly reflecting a broader trend in popular fiction toward more realistic and relatable storytelling during that era."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the new Fantastic Four film is an omen, or maybe predictive programming, of something to come.

    It *heralds* a change... (see what I did there? Heh...)

    ReplyDelete

Your considered comments are welcome