The Inner Paralax

A couple of thousand years ago, a few ancient mathematicians decided they could figure out the circumference of the Earth from the angle of elevation of the Sun at specific times at given locations of reference.

Plato went a bit further. He considered the way we conceive of spatial images inside our minds when thinking about a problem to do with shapes and sizes: he gave the example of a line between a pole say, 'here,' and one far away near the horizon - and then extended all the way to an invisible pole far beyond the horizon but still in the same line/plane.

Just where does the mind 'think' in its imagining, that the pole is fixed into the sphere around the other side past where we are able to see...?

You see, my friends - one of the reasons no one anywhere on YouTube even given the innumerable amount of videos from gurus telling you all about the 'hidden chakras,' or 'how to manifest using thought' can really show you how to 'do it,' is simply because they have a completely awry idea about where things are one 'the inside...' It's a sphere, you see, and when you think you are going in a straight line anywhere in there, you're actually turning in a circle, around a sphere as it were, and are continuously ending up somewhere other than where you really want to be. You therefore fail to 'see' anything for real, and it's all just imaginings, and moreover, imaginings which are just plain 'wrongly located' anyway.

Oh there are things inside of there all right. But you won't ever find them if you carry on the way simply everyone on the planet wants to have you go. 

One of the rare pics that capture the form accurately for the
new Mercedes GT

Isaac Newton set things right going in the outward direction, visually (for light frequency) - 'the square of the distance.' And in the opposite direction the inverse of the square, but then, you have to factor in the torsion mechanism; the so-called 'right hand rule' of electromagnetic fields.

If you want maybe a simple practical example of the consequences of false spatial belief, then look no further than the latest Mercedes GT sports car. This is probably the worst, the weakest photographed of any modern upscale vehicle. And this is because the photographers across the commercial world do not like to show in pictures, what the designers have made in three-dimensions - the designers have made a deliberately exaggerated shape in order to captivate the senses and the mind's eye. All the photographers are quite literally presuming the design is flawed! And they are quite deliberately tampering on film with the actual shape - using their knowledge of angles and lighting, and sometimes, even using 'photo-shop' trickery - in order to produce what they imagine is a more 'acceptable' appearance.

I mean they are completely arrogant and frankly, nuts; the car is stunning in real life. But, it jars with their preconceived notions of what 'good design' ought to be from their two-dimensional mindset.

The world inside a human being, is much different to the simplistic dimensions we are used to with our natural physical material senses that we use so much of.