How Do 'They' Know And The NSA Doesn't

While there were a round of co-ordinated attacks by ISIS in several different countries, at the same time a group of ISIS operators in the Chechnya Republic were intercepted and killed as they were attempting to launch deadly attacks in Grozny.

Now how is it possible that Ramzan Kadyrov - Depardieu's best mate - can know about these things and the NSA and MI5 and Europol not know about similar attacks, especially since Europol is part of the 'eyes' system under the organisation and management of the NSA?

Of course, once again, it was just another coincidence that I happened to post a few things here a few days ago... Remember?

Elizabeth Hurley in Grozny

The French, who got a touch miffed by the Wikileaks release about the NSA bugging their most senior government officials, were really roughed about with the decapitation of a factory manager in Lyon by some ISIS swine who also torched the place.

Jesus the gall of the NSA. Ex-boss General Alexander has been hanging out at some French Chateaux - but god I'm not supposed to know that! 

I can't help but get the feeling now that ISIS... well, that it IS the NSA themselves. Pretty much. With the help of some Saudi money and input. Which makes for some strange bedfellows you would have to think.

You have to ask questions when the President of the United States is sitting there twiddling his thumbs and making out like he's MLK, and ISIS is charging around the place apparently completely unimpeded. 

Kadyrov - his horse ran third in a Melbourne Cup
A damned fine performance for an old horse
Pic is courtesy of ITAR TASS NEWS AGENCY
from their report of 27 June 2015

Except for as soon as they try something inside any Russian territory or allied State.

Just plain weird, given the amount of money and technology in the hands of the US Intelligence establishments.

Just Sayin'

Huff Po told us on 24 June that the 30th June is World Asteroid Day - a day designed for people and leaders of governments to think about 'Near Earth Objects' and to get organised to fund technology that can divert in-coming asteroids (from the huge cloud of them between Mars and Jupiter) some of which can turn towards the Earth and collide at great speed and with considerable mass.

NASA thinks nuking them might do the trick.

This is the Huffington Post pic of the 24th of this month

If Wikileaks ever spread around what exists about what is really being said inside of leading Intelligence Organisations around the world about this, Wikileaks would lose all credibility overnight.

Sometimes you have to lie to the public - to lie by omission - just so you can keep credible.

I have no such problem.

CGI from a music video by:
'London Elektricity.'

There IS a possibility of such an object coming in. Would it constitute a public nuisance if I started suggesting places not to go to in case of er, incoming objects?

I'll have to look into that and check. 

"Yes, accidents do happen. Planes hitting the twin towers was no accident but meteorites hitting the MI5 buildings in London would be."

That was from my blog of 16 June.

Just sayin'. You know.

Illuminations From The NSA

Accidents of course, do happen throughout history. The original insignia of the United Kingdom's MI5 contains a lot of similarities within its imagery to the whole modern Illuminati folkloric symbology.

The present logo is different

Everybody knows that the Illuminati was originally a Bavarian secret society. It doesn't help though that that original MI5 insignia is also similar to an insignia of a Nazi death squad within the Wehrmacht. Or that modern theorists link Heinz Kissinger with the beginnings of this theoretical and modern 'Illuminati' that runs everything by sinister means.

Even Fox's 'History Channel' insists on re-visiting the occult dimension of Nazism, and the influence on Nazism of mythologists and writers like Karl Wiligut and Edward Bulwer-Lytton - and thus there are still persisting hints today about modern 'Illuminism' and its transmission from the Nazi era via Kissinger.

Yes, accidents do happen. Planes hitting the twin towers was no accident but meteorites hitting the MI5 buildings in London would be.

Depardieu in Moscow is an accident and a co-incidence, and the direct targeting by the NSA of communications by French officials is co-incidence; the NSA bugs everyone - including all the Asians in this picture:

Everyone from the most junior clerk up in the Intelligence business knows that any information line goes both ways, upwards and downwards.

My own view is that certainly the Western Intelligence establishments have lost all control of the Snowden affair and they have gone well beyond running the risk of giving themselves away in very poor strategic ways.

The fact is, for sophisticate computer systems people, it is easy to know and to 'see' when a foreign government agency is 'watching' your electronic communications. And it is basic logic to realize that when they do it over something that is sensitive to them, then it is an admission of guilt, really.

Hurley in Grozny,
with Dip-a-de-do

I mean I've already said here that there was outside interference in the death of the Total Oil chief in Moscow. I don't know who would be sensitive over that except someone who hand their hand in it.

I've just chucked in the pic of Hurley because there's a Brit army name if there ever was one. Just co-incidence though. 

Satanic Way To Billions

For me, one of the abiding beauties of the internet, is the demonstrating of precisely how ignorant, pretty much anyone claiming to be some kind of authority on many subjects - the arcane ones in particular - really are. 

Take the on-going internet frisson about the Luciferian symbology all around us, nowadays given urban myth nomenclature covered by the term 'Illuminati.'

As you must know, this is linked to symbols that include pyramids and seeing-eyes.

Tony Colman, the music producer, gives an interview
to a Latvian interviewer, about music being
maths. I do not have an English translation.

The meaning of the words 'Annuit Coeptis' is claimed to be from the Latin epic the Aeneid and has something to do with God giving consent in a nod, and this 'gesture' is hinted at in Kubrick's movie 'Eyes Wide Shut.' Everything on the dollar bill has two meanings though, and most of them are straight-out puns. Even commonly, people presume the words do mean 'Providence nods its assent' to your venture. These words however, have to do with how they are actually sounded out, by cognoscenti. I am not going to say explicitly here, what they mean.

Traditionally, people of external authority say that the pyramid and the see-eye is to do with the 'chief cornerstone,' which is a biblical reference, and is supposed to be accepted as having to do with Jesus (the chief cornerstone).

That is not the case, though, in reality. The actual and real biblical reference, is to do with an item that is 'rejected by the builders,' and is NOT the chief cornerstone at all, but - in Greek - something at an extreme distance which has a specific geometrical significance to Greek philosophers and mathematicians. The word is 'akrogoniayos,' and the entire sentence or phrase that is used says: a small piece, rejected by the builders, has become the thing upon which everything turns, and is at an extreme distance from the mentality and conceptions of Mankind. 

No Masons will ever comprehend what this means. Not Freemasons, not High Masons, not stonemasons. There is no point people pretending to some special arcane knowledge they really do not possess - whether they are in secret societies or not. Whether these societies are large and materially successful or not. People do it though, wherever they can get away with it. In humanity, material success almost seldom equates to what the higher intellect can attain to. And so it is not any contradiction that materially successful people are regularly unsound on many other fronts.

Again many people, down through the years, have taken the sound 'ayos' (in 'akrogoniayos') to imply that it is an eye that is being spoken about.

There is an eye in the highest ranks of Freemasonry; it is an eye associated with an Underworldly being, which, when it gives assent to someone's venture, that venture is sure to succeed and to make vast amounts of money. No one in the highest ranks of Masonry are unbelievers in something, because they are shown experiences that are not on the material plane of things.

But here is something no Mason knows about when it comes to the word 'akrogoniayos:' This is a very ancient word and it means - 'extreme point, turning and opening out.' In modern English we can say, the Apex, as in the very Apex, but much more accurately, the correct concept is 'axis point.'

Such a thing, is at an extreme distance to whatever the endeavours of mortal material Man can ambit. According to the New Testament of the Bible.

Month For Running Second

And so, a week after the moderate run of the race horse Shamal Wind in the King's Stand Stakes, we learn that the mare will go to the Irish stallion Sea The Stars - considered by authorities on the sport as one of the greatest race horses of all time! And if you don't believe me, just Google it!

Now I can tell you what this might imply as far as the last run of the horse is concerned but to cut a long story short, no one risks a mare that is accepted for such an illustrious stallion in any kind of 'violence' racing at Ascot - which is known as a track with let's just say, 'peculiarities...'

For one thing, the prize money is ridiculously low and that generally implies the place has more to do with showing a horse to the breeding industry than actually racing it.

His Highness, Aga Khan

Sea The Stars won the Prix de  L'Arc de Triomphe, and the Epsom as well so it is some special kind of horse.

Not only that, it stands at the Aga Khan's Stud in Ballydoyle in Ireland. Recalling, as we must, that the Aga Khan owned the greatest race horse of all modern times - Shergar. That was the one the IRA stole and killed.

Now I gotta tell ya I have a high opinion of the Aga Khan so I won't be indulging any conspiracy theories about any of this, other than to point out that the Aga Khan has been determined to breed close to what Shergar represented as a 'type' of racing animal. 

And so as far as I'm concerned, if, three or four years from now some Aussie horse starts somewhere as a rank outsider because everyone has forgotten what its dam-side really is, then it won't be any kind of surprise to me if the horse won by the length of the straight and made someone a quiet fortune.

Webber does an advert for Porsche

Anyway it has been the month for Aussies running second - Brazen Beau, the ten million dollar stallion, just ran a close second in the Diamond Jubilee Stakes at Royal Ascot, and Mark Webber drove for his Porsche team into the second podium position at Le Mans.

'Impeded?'

Somehow, the horse I was interested to watch, Shamal Wind, became 'impeded at the start' and really didn't have much of a chance after that even though it finished better than mid-field.

Once again at Ascot, the ground surface saw the entire body of horses drift across the strip-cut and rather high turf, from the left to the right for some reason only the jockeys will know for certain.

What d'you mean 'impeded?'

Muthmir hit the boards for a solid third.

I'm not quite sure what the phrase 'impeded at the start' means...

But alas, of course, this is in the nature of all matters where money is concerned.

Though as I indicated I did not personally bet on this fascinating race. The race is fascinating for reasons that I will not go into here, but those reasons are well-known to seasoned race horse gamblers.

Fashion is another reason to go to these things although the dress rules are too rigid for me.

What 'Was' The Middle Class?

A better question is - how can you go to Bilderberg when the 24 Hours of Le Mans is on?

And another important question is - why was the Middle Class...

General Motors' Chevrolet Corvette is the answer.

The new Corvette ZO6 - or its racing version at least - just won the GTE Pro division of the 2015 Le Mans race, and it was a bullet-proof exhibition.

For such a fantastic looking car in real life,
there are very few really good pics of it...

Fans of this icon brand and design ethos know that it represents many significant cultural things - it embodies a kind of practical futurology realized into a 'now' practicality, it embodies hope, it enshrines later Post-War industrialism and the prosperity of an American Middle Class at its zenith.

It ought to have receded into cultural nostalgia but the latest iteration of this design mode is probably the best sports car in the world today using advanced technology both in its construction and contained in the vehicle itself.

Le Mans is the 'holy grail' of world motor sport. It is the pinnacle challenge of speed and endurance, reliability and performance.

The standard news media studiously avoids giving much attention to Le Mans, who knows why? One can but speculate...

In the spectrum of what is available for money, the Corvette is not expensive. Especially not for what it actually is.

I don't own a Corvette but I am spiritually 'a Corvette person.'

I may pine for the late Fifties halcyon social and family cultural era - but I'm only going to think about it like a song. Or maybe... like a sonata.

Not like some 'always faithful' chant. Not like some 'Sempre Fidelis.' More like a real song.

Ascot When Not At Bilderberg

It's high summer in England and that means the race tracks are not as much of a quagmire as they otherwise usually are, and Sheikh Hamdan is likely to be in attendance on one of the major tracks somewhere.

Shamal Wind - will probably be wearing
different colours, maybe red and white,
in the King's Stand Stakes on Tuesday. 

10 million dollars buys you a day at the ISIL front if you are the US government, or a truly great racehorse - say something like the Sheikh's new acquisition, Brazen Beau.

Although entered for Tuesday's King's Stand Stakes at Ascot, the horse will more likely appear in the Diamond Jubilee Stakes a couple of weeks later on.

Another horse, Shamal Wind - which is quite a different kind of horse, has the ability to do amazing things in the King's Stand Stakes but it will depend on whether the surface of the track is not too treacherous and is able to provide some reasonable footing for genuinely attacking sprinters.

These kinds of races are not the sort of thing I gamble serious money on but they are intensely interesting all the same, partly because of the sheer frisson of the Ascot Track itself, and partly because if the really quick horses run to their capability on the day you will witness something truly special indeed.

Shamal Wind has one of the most amazing finishing bursts of any racehorse I have ever seen and is a sight to behold on her day.

How can the Sheikh be expected to waste his time at the Bilderberg Conference when he has the Ascot King's Stand Stakes to go to!

Interesting people do interesting things,
like have tea and Persian Fairy Floss.

He's a sensible man, the Sheikh. He owns a different horse in the same race - Muthmir - which isn't a bad horse by any means, but it isn't as exciting as Shamal Wind. This is definitely a fascinating race to watch. 

And I will be watching it. I'm not interested in things like the Bilderberger silly nonsense anymore. Unless Alex Jones or someone can come up with something entertaining about it. It's a bunch of crooks holding hands. And? The point is?

So they don't want us to know what they are talking about...So what. I don't want to know. Because no one there has any brains and they are never going to be able to say anything of interest to me anyway... I'm just not interested.



   

'The Greeks Imagined...'

For reasons that are unclear to me, you will see, all over the internet, when searching for information or commentaries about many subjects, very repetitious stock phrases that use presumptions that are virtually never challenged anywhere, but become the substance particularly of academic peer reviewed studies and of course, conclusions.

Here's an example: 'the Greeks imagined the Universe to be like the inside of a large brass bowl, with stars being kinds of jewels that are placed as adornments in the heavens.'

Oh very poetic.

Which 'Greeks,' I wonder, are being referred to here.

The Ancient Greeks imagined a forest
to be a bunch of trees!
Well fancy that.

Would it perhaps the satirist playwright Aristophanes, who was trying to poke fun at the wives of Athenian politicians left at home in the kitchens whilst their husbands were considering lofty matters of State elsewhere...

Or perhaps it was one of the speeches of a droll character inside one of the comedies.

'The Greeks.' This is a blanket presumption that all Greeks of ancient times all held the same view about a particular something - or about anything; which is so absurd an idea as to be more than slightly bizarre to my mind at least. And yet - this is the kind of taken-for-granted statement that abounds in today's world in which 'scientists' are completely right about everything all of the time.

'Hadron' comes from a Greek word that means 'huge.' And so the massive equipment that causes small particles to collide into each other at the stated 'considerable energy,' certainly, if nothing else, comes at a huge monetary cost.

It is not easy to challenge the various speech-makers everywhere on Ted Talks and other platforms for the mainstream mind-leaders, because no one will ever be afforded the chance to ask one of them, 'well, what Greek have you ever read fully?' I remember getting into an argument with the Dean of the Philosophy Department at the University I attended when I asked why it appeared the main lecturer seemed to only know of commentaries on various ancient Greek texts but had never seemed to know actually what was in the source texts themselves and never had a single source text on their book list. 

Moreover, once it comes to exact definitions and translations of words, we get into the rarified atmosphere in which virtually no one at all lives these days! So much so that proper names get regularly mistaken for ordinary nouns and their adjectival uses go missing.

BUT - someone seems to know what are in some of the old texts, because a lot of modern science (albet admittedly using modern instruments to 'produce' 'data') is just the re-naming using modern era words, and the attribution to modern people, of things that were long ago discovered or known. And then, when that won't do, there is this 'cutting in two' of some mysterious object (like a sub-atomic particle) and the consequent pronoucement about some new discovery of a particle or its force or characteristic.

Max Planck

The last truly great item of quantum science that was really discovered was Planck's Constant - if for no other obvious reason than that as an actual number, it is not some '1' (unity) or its opposite (and therefore '2' in total) or the 'up' or 'down,' or left or right spin through some axis of some otherwise perfectly unknown 'thing' said to exist.

Will Self, the radical journalist, after having been given a guided tour of the CERN facility, said he thought the whole thing was a scam designed to extract a whole of money from a group of governments - but it could not be that. Scientists are never motivated by money. Or power.

Being motivated by money and power would put them back in the time of the 1738 CE (means also 1738 AD) creation by the Rajput king Sawai Singh of the mysterious Jantar Mantar - which is widely and incorrectly translated these days once again all over the internet as the 'calculations formulae' structure. In fact it means the HUGE MAGICAL OCULUS - a machine or mechanism through which the king could see into the past and the future and all over space, and also via which he could cast magical chants in order to exert power over anyone or everyone. 

The trouble with people who find much to argue with me over this perspective, is that none of them have read any of the Greek texts that go into the ontology of arithmetic, and the ontology of geometry - and the calculus extensions in those texts into what we now call quantum level mechanics, and the nature of the Universe.

What is true is that 'the Greeks did not imagine,' anything about the Universe - except those Greeks who were writers of fantasy stories. And as far as 'the IIluminati' goes, well, Pythagoras never imparted anything to students who were not with him consistently for fourteen years! So I'm not sure how 'what the Greeks knew or imagined' is known to anyone not actually inside those Pythagorean Schools for one example of 'the Greeks.'

The functional value of Planck's Constant appears in the nuclear bomb. The functional value of the Higgs Boson, much to many people's disappointment, has not yet appeared anywhere.

However, I note that the 'Higgs Boson' is the symmetrical opposite (thus 1 thing of 2 things...) of either the fundamental particle or force or unit type of energy of the ordinary electromagnetic field. It is opposite because it cannot be turned off. And because it cannot be turned off, we can not ever observe it by differentiation. Scientists however know that it exists. As surely as there are grant funders who exist. 

The Delhi Jantar Mantar. Inside the structures and outside all around
are strange metal devices and instruments,
beautifully made and with obscure symbols all over them,
though at least one of them, is a sundial.

Trust me, if you invert the Higgs Boson field by causing it to rotate around its own axis ( if you could find one thereof) incredibly fast, you can create a black hole in the positive pole, whereupon it can eat itself continuously and yet spew itself back out through the negative pole - however each subsequent packet of spewed re-circulated particles is a new Universe; which is a way we get into 'String Theory.' String Theory, as you know, is a bunch of numbers but not just any numbers, they are the exact same numbers we ordinarily use every day, it's just that er, er, er, they are named after a prominent modern scientist that fell down in yesterday's shower of rain in Oxford or somewhere. Lucky us. Everything is so different because of today's science. So, so, different.

God people were so stupid in the past. Up until Planck, people looked at atomic and sub-atomic particles, but after Einstein, we can now look into 'space' and 'time!' 

Tomorrow, we will be able to to look into smoke and mirrors too. Smoke and mirrors do exist, because they are possibly the symmetrical antitheses of space and time. Not ordinary 'smoke' and 'mirrors' of course, you understand, but 'smoke x 2 to the 1/3 power >*&^$^&*^^$#' and 'mirrors x square root of !%$#$%$#%^.'