Only For The Few

I watched a conversation recently between several distinguished University types - over the philosophical potential of 'time travel.' One clever person proposed the old standard 'thought experiment' about why no one from some enlightened future came back and 'took out' Hitler or prevented some catastrophic pandemic and all of that.

The output - mipperi ('coming to manifest fruition'), of this
channel - ates - ('tree') is for getting back to space - sawdeh -
from the axis ('middle of the field'). If you go on either side of the axis,
you die.

Literally absolutely no one at all in the group having the discussion, could see past their own prejudice over some presumed (and in fact non-existent) primacy of 'group think/group well-being/group benefit.'

What makes it necessarily so that the real Universe 'regards' the well-being of larger numbers over that of smaller numbers? Nothing. And quite to the contrary, it is more manifest reality that there are ascending hierarchies of lesser and lesser numbers as the qualitative differences increase in any standard of continuous gradation.

I guess what I am really trying to say to you all here...

...is that we just might embark on some 'mysterious' (to the rest of the planet) adventure soon that will result in all of you 'stumbling upon' some 'box of antique device' - lol - the opening of which shall present you with riches far beyond the dreams of ordinary mortals.

Would you like that?

"Years later, the shipwrecked Odysseus, on his homeward way from Troy, landed on a Phaeacian beach, where he was discovered by Alcinous' daughter Nausicaa, who had gone there to wash clothes. At this time, the city was surrounded by high battlements, and had two harbors, the Phaeacians being excellent navigators. The king's palace was a splendid building with doors of gold and walls of bronze topped with enamel tiles. The entrance was protected by gold and silver dogs that served as sentries, and outside the courtyard there was a large orchard where there grew pear, pomegranate, apple, fig, and olive trees that gave fruit of the best quality at all seasons of the year. The same was in their vineyard, for while some grapes dried in the sun, others were gathered or being trodden, and still others were unripe. The Phaeacian chiefs enjoyed their great food and wine in a large hall, where youths of gold held flaming torches to light them by night.

This blessed realm, where the gods used to show themselves without disguise when attending the Phaeacian banquets, was the last foreign land Odysseus visited before returning to Ithaca. It was here that he found assistance, and King Alcinous, after bestowing gifts on him, sent him home in a Phaeacian ship, constructed with superior knowledge, for the vessel had neither steersmen nor steering-oars, and knew by itself what the crew was thinking and proposed to do." HOMER, the Odyssey.

So Where Are The Apples?

One of the most genuinely obscure, mysterious and fascinating texts is the original Ptolemy II compilation version of the Book of Genesis. Being put together by largely ethnically Hebrew scribes, it has been widely assumed that the book itself was both originally a Hebrew religious book, and written in ancient Hebrew.

The factual reality of it though, is so much more complicated, that it makes any such conclusion very dysfunctional.

For one thing, regardless of whether you want to maintain that it is an ancient Hebrew narrative or not, there are too many non-Hebrew words in it, words that have literally NO OTHER COMMON HEBREW usage as actual words - for the thing to have logically originated from the Hebrew culture.

An 'Apple of Eden' from the movie 'Assassin's Creed'
written by a highly-learned French Algerian.
I must admit, this is a very beautiful piece of art and design. 

Secondly, all of the key words - like, 'garden,' 'tree,' 'eat' - and some others, have so many duplicate meanings in Hebrew, that unless you have a concrete logical reason to employ one meaning over any other of the possible meanings, you cannot presume you know what your are saying/translating.

So where are the apples?

What we have today is a common myth or child's fairy-tale version of the actual Book of Genesis... Once upon a time/innocent 'newly-created' man/woman/beautiful garden/trees/fruit/happiness/problem/things change/snake/scary/bad/and the moral of the story blah blah blah.

The exact word in the original text we all think is 'apple' is mipperi. It definitely doesn't mean 'apple' and maybe it can mean 'come to fruition.'

However there is absolutely no such thing in the Book of Genesis as 'the knowledge of good and evil.' The exact compound word is tov-wa-ra. Tov-wa-Ra is something you could encounter in an applied physics research laboratory in relation to a sine wave.

You see... there are very highly sinister people in the world today, who know exactly, what is in the Book of Genesis. And sometimes when they set out to manipulate people through schemes, they can tend to give things away, but I suppose only to those with sharp, prepared, minds.

You would be just as well-informed, entertaining yourself with the 'Assassin's Creed' movie, in which there are these things called 'the Apples of Eden' - as having some only moderately-skilled person such as myself try and explain what the Book of Genesis actually says.

By the way (maybe I should say this, maybe I shouldn't...) 'Si-Tov-Wa-Ra-Nit' is 'Sutekh' or 'Set' or 'Suty,' or...in our modern language - Satan.

He Reveals The Profound And Hidden Things

This is a quote from Daniel 2:22.

And how!

If you could just go to some museum, or gallery, and just see the truth of what is otherwise and everywhere else completely hidden...

This is Muhammad's bow, his sword, and
his walking stick - all at the Topkapi

Maybe then people would not have to 'dispute' among themselves about the meaning of this or that particular obscure thing.

Alas, though - maybe not. More than likely, they would - some of them, maybe many of them - still want to argue and hold completely ridiculous ideas and beliefs and maintain these long and loud and hard to anyone passing by; nay, they would even grab people by the collars and drag them to listen.

One of our close associates here just sent me some pics of the palace of Topkapi in Turkey. I think he wants me to forward these to Crown Prince Salman, so that, in place of the sword (Ref: Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52 'know that Paradise is under the shades of swords.') Salman can produce an innovation and stick a plastic bag onto the new Arabian Flag, and also change his name and the name of the country to 'Plastic (petrochemical) Bag Arabia.' I'm sure Erdogan of Turkey would approve, seeing that he has this audio tape of Jamal Khashoggi being suffocated (quote: "I'm being suffocated!") by a plastic bag being pulled over his head.

Crown Prince Salman can even create some calligraphy for his new 'tughra.'

Now...

When you take a word like 'paradise' that someone lifted off the compilation of sacred global writings made under the orders of Ptolemy II of Alexandria, then you'd better be cautious about what that actual original word is and what it means in the language you found it first in that place. (Not forgetting, that the actual orders of Ptolemy were to compile a single archive from ALL the sacred writings of THE WHOLE KNOWN WORLD...)

The word in what we today call 'the Book of Genesis' is not the Hebrew word for heaven, and 'paradise' is in any case - the way we say it, and translate it into English - a Persian phrase with a meaning like 'eternal gardens.' And that is not what it says in Genesis at the part where 'Eve' and Adam' are said to 'enjoy Paradise with the Elohim...'

The word in the Book of Genesis, is - 'gan.' And it is a Sanskrit word.

When we look at the Muslim narrative account, we see that 'Heaven' - or 'Paradise' is divided into several strata, one of them being the 'Jannat al-Adn:' aka Garden of Eden.

And... here's a box of jewels from Topkapi

Why we all say 'Eden' I don't know because none of the original texts actually say it exactly like that - what they say is: 'a cultivation which is permanent and eternal, that is known to us FROM THE PAST OF TIME.' 'From' or 'In the East' (which everyone says, be they Muslim or Jewish or Christian - namely, that 'the Garden is situated somewhere IN THE EAST') is incorrect. What it says is 'from out of where PAST TIME COMES' or 'is.'

So - 'Gan - Ate (that's the correct Hebrew word for 'garden'/'Ates') al- Nud,' or, as it is in Egyptian 'Neid' or 'Nud.' We even say this today in the English vernacular - 'in the land of Nod.'

Since 'Adam' was apparently ejected from this 'Garden of Eden' nobody can 'know it' anymore as a direct experience, but only as a remembrance of the deep and distant mythic past.

9/11 In Melbourne

We've talked about this ISIS 'chemical courage' drug called Captagon. Recently, in fact.

How they do it - arrange for some poor dumb schmuck (in this case, the schmuck was from Sudan, a place where there is nothing but death and slaughter in the past few decades) to lose his mind, and stomp around wielding a knife with devastating effect - is that they put them through a long bout of pretend praying, which is in fact sustained sleep deprivation, and then get them addicted to this drug Captagon in binary form and rising doses, until they are ready to launch the human weapon out into the public.

That's how it's done.

The Dark Past...

You know, if you have ever had any nagging questions about what the common public thinks it knows - even what is taught as fact at Universities - then what I am about to hint about, will confirm you into what Lionel Nation at RT News has coined as 'the Conspiratorium;' the place all of us live, who hold some belief in some dark and mysterious conspiracy, somewhere, somewhere, anywhere.  

I know, recently, I have taken to a lot of 'LOL'-worthy stuff.

If you listen to David Attenborough, you would presume that there was this whole body of textual material, written by 'the great founder, in ancient times, of scientific thinking' - Aristotle.

Let's face it, Aristotle is taught all over the world, at schools, in Universities, on television. So to what are they all referring?

I dunno. (Shrugs).

Hey, who the hell I am to make pronouncements on 'the great' Aristotle?

This is a modern luxury Antorini leather journal -
Aristotle did not use this; he wrote in papyrus scrolls, which
are all... ...gone. 

To my knowledge, the only complete work guaranteed to have actually been 'penned' (well, I use the word loosely) by Aristotle is a work about play-writing and the theater. And in it he talks about drama and comedy and theatrical catharsis. And there are some notes and lists of botanical subjects and some notes about animals to which the real 'Aristotle' affixed his hand-written name, the copies of which document are not contested as authentic and exact reproductions made in antiquity. 

All the rest of the stuff attributed either to Aristotle, or that makes long-winded commentary on the supposed ideas of Aristotle are in what is called the Corpus Aristotelicum - and these are a collection of works from the school of Aristotle that are claimed to mention all of his works (that we know about). They are not actual works, actually by him.

You will find, when you look, that everything that is attributed popularly as an actual work by Aristotle, is actually written by someone else; so, when you see 'the Organon' which is always said to be 'by Aristotle' is actually by someone called 'Andronicus of Rhodes,' and virtually every single other supposed 'text' or work by 'Aristotle' features some 'Aristotle' literally as a dramatic character in the narrative...

So really, when you think about it, this makes sense in that the Platonic School (which the historical person and student, Aristotle, inherited after Plato's death) had all these actual books written by actual 'Plato' in which this 'person' or 'character' called 'Socrates' takes the dramatic part, fulfills the role in the story or narrative account or explanation of something. There is no such thing as 'a book by Socrates!'

Whoar! These are nice - you write
lots of amazing stuff and carry it around in these

The 'actual' works of the actual 'Aristotle' were all burned in the fires of Alexandria, and the only remnants around the place turned up much later on as re-written texts in the hands of Arabic scholars hundreds of years later. And no doubt, they had a good grasp of what 'Aristotle' was writing about, but there is no genuine basis to any certainty at all, that what they had were actual, objectively and independently-verified, valid translations or transcriptions.

You see, here's the other problem - people like Plato, knew that ever since the murders of Socrates and a lot of the followers earlier, of Parmenides and Pythagoras, it was just not prudent, not safe, to be exposed as someone who personally possessed legitimate mathematical knowledge, or the kind of intense idea knowledge covering subjects like ethics or the early forms of 'psychology.' Such knowledge undermined the power of whoever the local or regional tyrant might have been!

And so I will heap coals on the fire by suggesting that there always has been a conspiracy of 'intellectuals' who overtake someone else's work, subvert it, and suppress the real thing, in order to maintain the status quo of the political gods of the day - and this is the true meaning of what today people term 'the Illuminati.' And you will see the dark but characteristic hand of this style of thing when you look at modern things like 'Common Core' and 'Writers' Workshops' and when you look at highly-promoted public 'thinkers' like Jordan Peterson and Reza Aslan and David Attenborough, and even figures of note in the world of popular fiction: people like John Le Carre, who at age 30-something, is claimed to have penned 'The Spy Who Came In From The Cold.,' a rather large tome...

The thing about 'Common Core' and 'Writers' Workshop' is this (IE formal - they talk about it specifically) idea they have about 'persuasive writing' - which is a concept that you can make people take actions by the way you hand them some words and also what those words are and how you have constructed those words into sentences and how you treated the ideas therein.