Sioboulla...

You don't know that word.

It is Aeolic. From Aeolia.

These people are the pre-Greek Pelasgians who split into two groups, with one going from Ancient Anatolia to North Africa where they established what is known today as Phoenicia but in fact earlier than that, is a famous or infamous Empire which goes by another name we do not need to mention. The Phoenician empire extended all the way to Lebanon which is why there is this strong connection between them and Aeolia.

A Byzantine text - 
'what is said and what is written.'
Note, how it is written.

'Sio-Boulla' means 'Thio-Boullos:' the (announced/formally stated) Will of God.

Today we use the modern word Sibyl.

Another word you need to know the accurate correct meaning of, is - 'Malakhin.' This is also a Pelasgian word, which is in fact three separate short words that end up rendering a meaning like 'they appear somewhat soft.' And by 'soft' this is in the same way Irish people or Gaelic people would describe fairies. On the surface they appear ephemeral, but they possess incredible power underneath their superficial and initial appearance.

All of these things are culturally from that Empire whose name we need not spell out.

Ammon Hillman is quite right when he says that the Gospels - and in fact as he even says so himself - the whole of the Bible, is riddled with strong hints and indications that there are underlying meanings to the words being used and the phrases and the identities, and that these all have particular ties to Ancient Pelasgia.

All that you need to keep in mind, is that 'Sibyl,' 'the Burning Purple,' 'prophecy' and the 'Gorgons' - are all things to do with North Africa; ancient Pelasgia - that Empire whose modern-known name we need not detail right now.

The word 'Logos' - which the Bible employs to describe how the Universe was made, is also another one of these words: the first time we see it in ancient texts is in the writings of Heraclitus (6th century BC), another person from the general area of the Aeolians.

When the boy-king Josiah caused the violent oppression of the actual rituals to do with the Ark of the Covenant, the color of the sacred fabrics that were used in those rituals were changed and he ran out of the Murex cloths that had previously been used...

Dolce & Gabbana's 
Byzantine Exhibition
at the Palazzo Real, Milan.

And, very specifically, the Old Testament spells out that prior to that time, categorically it was Murex Purple, which was used as the coloring media.

Sibyls are of the Malakhim. Or 'Malakhin' if you want to use the Ancient Greek.

They are not physically strong and they live out of the sun as much as possible, and their skin is soft and white, almost bluish-grey.

They will not hang around if you invoke physical violence against them or anyone they employ.

On the other hand if they feel personally offended they can wipe you out completely.

Because they see the future, if there are reasons for them to retire from a particular culture or place, they will simply do that without visiting too much destruction on the place or its rulers.

Recalling that you have been told that the Sirens (also Phoenician) were beings who came down like sparkly embers from the stars, and who gave the Burning Purple to the male leader of the tribe of Malakhin living in Ancient Tunisia (Phoenicia), then we can proceed further...

The Roman historian Livy wrote that Hannibal was a worshiper of Melqart (this means 'Angel Prince of the City'), and before his march to Italy he visited the Temple of Jupiter at Cadiz (anciently-called, Gades), where he was met in the night by a youth of divine beauty, who told him various things that you can read about by consulting references to the works of Livy about Hannibal.

From Tunisia.

This is the 'youth' in the Gospel of Mark in the Garden of Gethsemane scene; same as the youth in the tomb when the women went there first.

Of course, Hillman will not be inclined to say this!

But I will tell you, that the Gospel-writer 'Mark' was born in Tunisia, and this idea of 'vinegar on a spurge' being offered to Jesus on the Cross is another reference to North Africa and Tunisia and Libya (Libya is where the Gorgons came from...), because this spurge was Euphorbia Resinifera, which in the hands of the Medea cult women, would procure virtually instant death.

The vinegar rapidly decarboxylates the toxin and makes it easy to ingest but quite lethal all the same.

Now. Here is what you absolutely are required to know - all things like this proceed along two lines, always.

This is what it means to say 'parabola;' or to speak in parables.

There is 'Si-Vola' (Sibyls) and there is 'para-vola' (two tied paths).

This is also why, if some of you have been looking up into the night sky, you have been seeing two, at least two, what look like satellites but are not, in tandem, moving and/or being quite still, where nothing else should be visible at that spot.

There are few or no Sibyls around today. 

There is only you.

A thousand people can take some blue dye of the kind they really did use when the Hebrew Oracles of Moses and so on, were determining what was going to happen, and absolutely nothing will happen for them.

Someone being interviewed
by Alan Steinfield.
'Can I check your authentication
codes that I know you've got on you?'
LOL

But you, have been told the way.

And there is no limitation to how much money, or power or whatever else you want to have happen, is able to quickly unfold for those who proceed using the Atlantean - oh dear, there I go,  saying the name - rituals. Keep in mind what Plato said, though - 'when those noble sons no longer were able to bear their name and rightful positions in keeping either with the ethics and order of Heaven, the Great Leader of the Gods and of Men, called together the Divine Council and, pulling his beautiful azure coat of Supreme Kingship over his broad shoulders, he addressed them all as follows -.

And there, the Book of the Critias, ends summarily. Or so it would seem.

Keeping Your Pole Star In View

No matter what bad things happen to you in your life as it moves ahead, if you manage to keep your course and direction relatively steady - by knowing how to read the 'Pole Star' - you will find the way to where you really want to be.

Life - the human living of it - is about traveling somewhere. It's about actually getting somewhere.

I try to keep things as brief as I can in here so that you don't have to wade through ads...

Let me tell you something which is really important: that even Ammon Hillman does not know.

He knows a real lot, but he does not know.

Silk markets of Jaipur...
Lamps, carpets - you know,
that kind of thing.

He does not know or get the point -, I guess you could call it the 'ultimate secret.'

LOL That one. Yes that one behind attempts since forever to write books with titles like 'The Secret Teachings of Mushroom Jesus.' (There is no such book, btw, in case you head off to search for one called that. If you can keep a straight face, perhaps you can write it yourself).

Look, let's accept for one moment that the basic Jewish story has some kind of truth in it somewhere - still, a question that could be posed is, how come this 'Jehovah' stopped 'accepting the sacrifice in the Tent of Offering' during the reign of the catamite boy-king Josiah?

Josiah is the one, if you remember, who by most religious scholarship and standard academically-acknowledged accounts, buried the 'Ark of the Covenant ' somewhere although why he did that, no one seems to know that is regarded as having the 'correct' official answer.

What does it even mean 'accept the sacrifices...'

Apparently Jehovah sent down a fire that consumed these material offerings.

And yeah, inside the Ark, there was this glow. Well so okay, some mushrooms glow in the dark and Josiah placed the 'manna' from the desert or 'from Heaven' in there along with the other things (whatever they were).

Mushroom Jesus, see?

Good photo though.

LOL

None of this is true, that is to say, this slant is not what was going on, although for sure it was during the reign of Josiah that these things suddenly 'disappeared.' And he caused them to disappear by his edicts. ...Would have been on the orders and instructions, initially, of the powers behind his throne. By the end of his life, he was 'one of them' completely though.

'One of them.'

People who do not have the mystical access to power, but who want it, and take it by force of arms.

Over the next few articles here, I will be detailing what that power is, how you access it, and I will not be discussing these thing anywhere else. 

In other words, you will get in here, direct knowledge quite freely albeit some of you contribute financially and the rest by staying around and participating as well - of the actual meaning behind the whole entire Bible.

What I mean by that is 'Moses parted the Red Sea,' and 'Jesus walked on water' and so on - miracles, weird, scientifically-impossible things.

Why not?

What makes you not entitled to get such knowledge? Or such power.

Traditionally, it was single women not romantically or by mercantile gain, involved with anyone else, who were the Sibyls. This was so that people would have confidence in the objectivity of what they were pronouncing.

...Because of the Great Comet
of 1811.

Another way to achieve the same ends though, is that you have the power yourself. It doesn't matter that you are intending to advantage yourself - that is in any case the entire point of being given knowledge of future events; it is so that you make good decisions for yourself (and for others).

In the ancient past, people accessed particular oracles (The Hebrew Ark of the Covenant and Tent of Meeting are oracles) at certain particular places, and this was via some designated and specific individual with lots of deep training.

Modern readers tend to either not even know, or not realize, that these oracles actually also determined the course of certain events by their own powers.

I think people generally believe 'oracles' told the future. No - they determined, the future.

And I will show you how that is the case from the ancient sources, and also, what the method was and still is.

If you imagine there is some Divine decree prohibiting your material well-being and even extreme wealth, forget it! There isn't. Yes there are issues of being responsible and so on, but these are just normal things we still have to deal with in ordinary life matters.

We're going up to the high
place, to see God.
We are. Oh yes we are.

It's not really an issue that too many people will be able to see all of this - not that many people come here to this place and read. 

Okay I might outline beforehand where we are entering the 'hot territory' and then maybe you can say whether you want to keep these areas a bit private all the same. But for now, we press forward!

Prepare to have your mind blown.

This Is Worth It (Film Review)

So I just had the opportunity - on account of knowing some artsy friends who arrive and disappear at any moment too - to watch the film 'Widow Clicquot' at the main cinema in the city here. 

There was zero fanfare, none of the regular wine merchant displays that often accompany much lesser movies. There is a very fine little wine bar in the place, away from the main ticketing area which also has a bar and pretty good small food offerings. This more private bar is right at the heart of the cross-roads as it were, to all of the main theaters including the so-called 'Platinum Club' experience theatrette (which is very nice and tends to show off-the-beaten-trail Euro flicks, and so that's pretty cool).

Where are we going today,
Calvin. Take us...

The smallish theater for this movie was virtually at capacity, all older people, very middle class-ish (I am a complete snob about that; prefer the company of peasants, frankly).

On the one hand on agreeing to go see this I was skeptical because I haven't seen a good new movie in years, yet on the other hand I thought, well, how wrong are they going to be able to get the history of an icon...?

'Widow Clicquot' of course refers to the woman who started the great Champagne House of Veuve Clicquot.

...And, to ease my typical early disquiet, I was quite ready to pounce at falsity and denounce this as just another one of the lunatic propaganda pieces from the same tribe of movie-making idiots who have captured the scene in recent times - if for no other reason than that I have always liked this brand of Champagne. At one point someone (someone important actually, now that I come to think about it) in their marketing people actually announced me 'an ambassador of the House of Veuve Clicquot;' I'm not sure but I think it was around the time when I used to get invited to Arthur Andersen shows and Whatsisname Brandson would be around them.

So anyway I was ready to denounce this thing though at the same time being an actual idiot movie-lover (not an idiot for commercial reasons alone) and an eternal optimist, I began to watch with hope and an open mind because I do like to see other people's opinions too.

The thing starts, ten seconds in I could not see the stars as obviously immediately beautiful or memorable but instead rather neutral - young faces to me at least: unknowns.

I had no knowledge from the opening titles (and these were tightly-framed and sparse) who the producers were, or what the money was behind the film.

The Imperial Russians in Paris, see.

Turns out, later when I looked into it, this was made by none other than literally the William Morris Agency (or Group or whoever they call themselves now, but this is the serious entertainment agency and money of yore).

Maybe three minutes in - I was going to say five, but I think it's actually closer to three - I was close to tears, not necessarily because the dramatic action (in the sense of story-line, right, not 'action' action) was evoking it but because I sensed where this should be going, if true to the reality, both of wine-making broadly, and this history particularly.

My grandfather made wine, my grandmother made wine and sold it, my mother made wine and sold it... I do none of those things.

But they did do.

Twenty minutes in and I'm going 'don't let me down.'

Thirty minutes in I've forgotten about my prejudices and doubts and the production values, directing and ensemble cast have erased my doubts and fears and I have complete confidence in them - and now I'm just going with the story.

This thing is tightly and seamlessly edited, there are no flat-spots or faltering parts, and the necessary seeming emotional bathos is not jarring and becomes almost a gothic element in the artistic sense.

But not so as anyone unschooled would notice it either.

I don't think anyone in the audience got the movie at all on the levels at which it was operating.

When one of the major characters said to the female lead's character (which is of course Barbe-Nicole, Madame Clcquot) 'Ah, I see that you are a criminal at heart,' I nearly clapped out loud but noticed no one else was rising to the point. Or worse yet to the spirit of the whole story-line and the style of its protagonist.

A little criminal enterprise.

Madame Clcquot was proposing to evade or break the embargo demanded by Napoleon by secretly diverting a new shipment to Amsterdam and from thence into Imperial Russia (therefore a criminal, you see, by Napoleonic decrees).

Anyway, to cut a long story short for you (however, the movie is not long; it's very short by today's standards), this is certainly one of the best movies ever made of all time.

There you are.

The end.

Not quite the end.

When the lights came on, and everyone went out, I did clap, no one else did and some of the more audible comments were from women on the arms of their very average husbands, were of this sort: 'It's a man's world, isn't it.'

Totally not the message of the movie at all, and nothing like what its ending implied although superficially the key ending scene is before a legal tribunal where Clicquot was being examined or charged with impropriety by some in-laws and competing wine-makers - apparently for running a business and a winery as an unwed female with outside romantic liaisons or somethings, it's not well-defined in the movie.

Not well-defined yes, but this is because of the tight editing making the obvious to the old saws perfectly well signaled -, what is thus inobvious to everyone else: namely, that the Widow Clcquot has a love relationship with a house-maid, and a sex relationship with the lair who is her select and brilliant trade merchant and representative to the Imperial Russian Court (means aristocracy and its social gatherings, yes?).

It's almost like 'As Good As It Gets' which no one understands is about the fact that the Nicholson character is the guy who robs all of the young artists that he 'arranges accommodation' for when they come to New York, and that is how he makes his money, not by writing books, which his secretaries do, and is merely a front for what he really does - I have not seen that explanation anywhere even by skilled and experienced film reviewers, but once you have been told it, you can never see the same movie again and fail to realize it!

Everyone else thinks the Nicholson movie is about some mature female finally getting with a grumpy old - quite detestable - man.

Now mind you, this is not an excuse - this movie isn't - an excuse for going out and getting silly drunk, okay.

If anything, it's a way of never getting drunk frivolously ever again. Instead, if you simply have to imbibe, then it will be all about the experience, all about life, the vines, the earth -, and the stars...

He he he. Yes yes, the comet of 1811.

Comets. Stars. Didn't think we'd get there this article, did you? LOL

Music for Champagne drinking:

   

Speaking Of The Future...

I think I've been pretty clear in recent times that most kinds of 'risk/reward' investing pathways are fraught with far too much downside potential for any serious investor to commit too deeply into anything that is not 'hard, physical' and where you can't readily get your own hands onto 'custody.'

Gold, silver... What else? Not much that springs to mind! Not in any short-medium term at any rate.

I'm not sold on all of these wonderful stories about things 'going up in price.' You won't be missing out on anything other than the big falls and all of the fragmentation of systems (means fraud...) along the way.

Had a meeting earlier today
with an interesting
artist in the gallery in this
complex -, which is next to the
'Barbagallo Watch Shop.'
LOL

Okay I guess if you have some property but then again, too much of that is a target for governments to tax and to levy fees on for whatever imaginative reasons they can think up.

A lot of the standard pop mythology about various figures of the ancient past who made a lot of material wealth - King Midas, King Solomon, the King of Tyre - fails to sufficiently note that wisdom in the case of both Hiram and Solomon were preexisting conditions with them, and that diligence and obsessive focus was what made Midas rich at first but then also led to his problem.

That problem being that he turned living people into cold un-moving statues made of gold.

Until of course the person who had given him this dubious 'power' - the god Hermes - agreed to remove the curse.

Living people are what make you happy. 

And in today's world it is some feat to be able to 'fall across' amazing people; they're not that common.

All the same when you come upon people, alive, apparently dynamic, hopefully engaged in finding their own futures, what you will mostly find are individuals with some energy remaining but flailing about, some of their qualities trying to be asserted and with their best capacities suppressed and held back by the present state and condition of the planet, by which I mean, of society.

This world is entirely about energy. Spiritual energy.

She does unique
scarves and shawls,
among other things.

That is what the contention is about.

As soon as you find a spiritual energy that is not the energy allowed to these people, in this world, you will encounter - by means of hidden, unseen, invisible energies and fields, some of it carried or adhering to people too - opposition to what you are doing.

Yet the energy in the normal planetary field as it is found widely, is very limited, and easily fractured - broken, in fact.

There is not enough space here to detail all of the facts about this, but where Ammon Hillman's theories should lead, is back to the basic starting point of Western culture and civilization from just before the Pelasgians, to what you might as well say is 'Atlantis' because that is the essential framework involved:

The myth story outlines an ancient practice of prior beings here other than 'modern humans,' which turned into the obelisk symbolism all over the Mediterranean including in Egypt and Babylon. This practice entails the regular receiving of energy from somewhere 'above.' The Asherah poles that the gay boy-king Josiah caused to be destroyed in the kingdom of Judah in the 7th century BC were the same thing. The reason he took away the actual original Ark of the Covenant and buried it somewhere was for the same cause.

(Original) Obelisks and Asherah poles connect people of the same natural energy.

With the stress on the word 'connect.' At least in the context of the human society the main thing is connection.

Modern human global technology systems of communication are fed into, with ideas and ideologies from you-don't-know-where. 

Barbagallo is the local
Ferrari dealer.
And - because I like cars, right!

But you will will find, that far from diversity being the result, amorphous monolithic cultural rigorous control, is the actual result. And that is intended.

The energy of the people in the world today, is unnatural. It claims to be inclusive and diverse, but in fact it is small, monolithic, and highly-controlled.

'You were called to Liberty, not to enslavement.'

In order to be free though, you have to have the right form of energy.

Don't ever make the foolish mistake of thinking there are not super-advanced space platforms just off the Earth nearby, manned (populated!) by very clever and rather intense though, I would have to say, beings from quite far away, who can do a lot more than just send and receive a few parallel wavy line drawing imagines into your brain and out from it.

'Seeing' and 'getting' is one thing - using what you get is going to be a 'knife-fight,' as they say.

But use you must and you will, as soon as you see.

Seeing is easy; believing is not so easy because of how much sophisticated and successful brainwashing has gone on on this planet for millennia. Not everyone is going to make it out of here, alive and in one piece.

Don't worry the pieces can be put back together. Eventually.

Old Money From Midas - The Revelation

I do think that for those who are only just entering into the world of mind communication outside of basic words and symbols, then yes, for sure the basic pathway can indeed be via a simplified form of remote viewing (which in any case is not all that simple to be honest). 

This involves a limited set of  image cards that - as the recent poster here explained - you can tie to a set of numbers and use those to try and send or receive correct information. The simple line images are like this one:

LOL - a wavy line; 
I couldn't find two parallel
wavy lines.
Otherwise I would have posted 
that.

On the one hand this does tend to eliminate some of the complicated dimensions that are required in order to engage the full suite, as it were, of the mind's appreciation of sensory signalling - on the other hand for a lot of us here we are a long way up the road from there already.

People with little to no prior exposure to actual 'remote viewing and communicating' will regularly ask - 'But how can you be so sure that you are always accurately getting information? Even if you got some target image cards right it does not mean there is any authentically reliable process occurring.'

The fact is at some point there is a section in the mind, a literal faculty, which opens up virtually something like a window, not so much even just a 'screen' - through which you see clearly and with all other sense channels working as well.

I'll admit few people get to this stage but those like Ingo Swann absolutely did.

But in the end these matters all boil down to one thing and one thing only - it's the spiritual thing: which religion is really 'True' and is there actually some kind of 'God' and what are we supposed to do about it (whether the thing is true or whether it is not meaning that there is no such thing as God).

Here is the answer and it is an absolute answer.

I will be quoting people but I do not need to say who I am quoting, just take it from me that I am saying it...

I took this pic
myself.
Was downstairs
from me, in the car-park!
Kind of has wavy lines in it too.

"The soul is denied truth unwillingly."

And,

"For the intellect to accede to truth, it requires that the intellect already possesses some innate means to agree, and that means we call 'soul.' "

The soul lives forever and yet that is not to say outright that 'you are god' or 'a god.'

A god is only that being with intellect which is nearest to Truth in every aspect of Itself. That there are gods - plural - is thus a self-evident fact provided by the statement of logic here; provided that one understands that individuals in existential reality are male and female, children, adults, the very old, everything in between. 

Truth as non-intellect imbued master-templates (in other words, something like 'the Laws of Physics' or principles of physics), is not any kind of superior Deity, either!

So there is in fact no prospect that there is only One God, who is different to all the other beings who are close to some aspect of pure Truth because that is monomania, monolithic - nonsensical, in fact. To accede to the True Knowledge (as an intellect, divine or otherwise) of being female, a thing must in fact be female. So, God who is only male but has intellect, is a non-existent thing; same as a God who is neither male nor female is also a non-existent thing since it cannot Truthfully know those states of being which also have living intellects and souls.

And again, you cannot have a living being closest to the best example of 'female,' and then yet have some 'superior' other being who is not in any way akin to the idea of 'female.' Same goes for every other thing possessing an intellect.

What this means is that it tells us something very important about us!

Going back to the intellect's ability to accede to Truth - that the human makes (is able to make) choices and decisions in its life, that try and get closest to what is Truthfully Good, absent of the material physical presence of a guiding deity, means that it, although not god per se, is certainly, most assuredly, part of the 'Divinity set-up' because it possesses an important aspect of God in it. Namely, it can be, that is to say, become like unto, perfect examples of the expressions of 'Good' - and when it does that automatically it enters into the realm of really Divine Beings.

That is just a logical fact statement.

Alisha Lehmann, the 
current
world's best
female soccer player
doing an advert for Adidas
last week.
ET's do not look
anything like that caricature!
Okay okay they have big slant-y
eyes and long fingers.
They're also incredibly
dexterous with hands and feet.
LOL If you got what I just said.

Here, let me reduce this down to a simpler idea, whose import will have an amazing response in your mind...

Let's say, a 'committee or council' of Divine Beings all agree (which they must do, always) to some decision regarding you, and to make things meaningful to you in this example, to your condition of material wealth.

Let's say they decide that you will be rich.

And you, since your soul accedes to this Truth, agree that it is Good, in your personal case at this time, that you are rich.

Well tell me, does this involve some 'games-of-the-mind,' on your behalf, in a sense, seeing that the closeness to templates of Truth are what constitutes Divine Actions.

Yes it does, it must do. Your mind is actively thinking about the 'why' and the 'Goodness' of it. I have called it a mind game, but I mean that it is the mind thinking dynamically.

And when you play those games, in your mind - how sure are you that you are using correct information...?

I hope you observed that we have gone back to something like a phrase that was used right up at the start here. 'How can you be so sure that you are always accurately getting information...' That phrase.

See it's that your internal mind and intellect accedes to some Truth -, that all of this, all of religion, really, is about.

Do not doubt for a single second that real gods do not have absolute rage about what humans do and how they too often behave (that is, badly). 

But notice too, with how much subtlety this whole thing proceeds.

The soul which has limited repetitions of acceding to Truth, is thus limited into the human mortal arrangement -, but it is not destroyed or cast away. 

But...

This is the reason you will not see masses of super fantastic ultra-advanced ET Alien spacecraft up above simply everybody's heads, for everyone to see.

This is the reason you'd better hope like hell, Jesus does not suddenly appear 'out of the clouds' as they say it, returning to Judge the Living and the Dead! 

Has extremely good vision...

All you want to have happen is for you to be judged. And I mean adjudged nearest to the rightest ways of behaving for the mostest longest time on the planet that reliably indicates what you are (what you are like inside).

Great English, isn't it. 

Yes it is, I think so, if'n I do say so myself. 

You want to be judged right now, right?

Are you getting the drift about true 'religion,' here?

These are the words of King Midas, Lord of Wealth.

And they are True. ...I just heard them a few seconds ago and have told them to you.