Markets can die. They do die - they have done so before in history.
The Peloponnesian War in ancient history was an exact case of a dominant power emerging from a particular war but then collapsing not long after as the internal population decreased while the large army was no longer able to be maintained by the state. This power was the city state of Sparta. Much vaunted by the Singaporeans but then, look what happened to the Spartans in the end!
Read us some history, Orlando. |
Things were not much different when the Sasanian Empire finally collapsed under the strain of its own internal political intrigues and assassinations.
Although Wikipedia characterizes the events as having been caused by the 'full-scale invasion of Persia by the Muslims' and then, the 'conquest of Persia by Umar al-Khattab' - no such things actually happened.
Umar was assassinated by his own court before the supposed eventual 'conquest' with the actual deadly act said to have been perpetrated by 'a Persian slave.' And then only after Umar had died, came the so-called 'annexation of Persia by the Arabs' in modern written history. In other words it's a fake story believed only by credulous Muslims themselves on the whole but then again, accepted mindlessly by the uncritical.
In fact 'the Arabs' at the time were a thousand miles away and could never have maintained military supply lines and all that ever happened was that following the murder of Khosrau by his own son Khavad II, the Sasanian Empire disintegrated leaving its soldiers in need of a wealthy patron and a means of living.
We're coming to the end of the Wildflower Season down here. It's all calm and peaceful. ...Down here. Far away. |
Consequently most of them basically threw their lot (and their arms) in with the wealthy Arab 'traders' who were more or less armed caravan robbers anyway and the proof of that is that eventually when Timur Khan arrived on the scene half a millennium later, he was an ethnic Persian and his 'brand' of Islam very different to what the Southern Arabs were believing in and practicing and he himself came to totally dominate the entire silk and spice trails.
He was not an Arab.
John of Damascus makes it very clear in some of the only independent writings of the relevant earlier time (the time, literally of 'Mahmut' as John of Damascus called him), 'Islam' was an heretical Christian sect, basically a 'Unitarian' ideology and rooted in the strange beliefs of the desert Nestorians and with quite a lot of star worshiping aspects derived from the Nabataeans. The proof of that is that the only coins dating from then which were 'Islamic' and Arabic, were re-strikings of Christian silver coins in Jerusalem with the name of the Arabic tyrant at the side of the Christian epithet for Christ 'The Praise-Worthy One!' ...And a cross on the coins still there which had been there from the start.
There was never in all events any one such thing as 'the Arabs.' There were Syrian Muslim Arabs, there were Yemeni Muslim Arabs, there were Najdi Muslim Arabs, and there were Turkish Ottoman Muslims I suppose you could say also in some sense who were 'Arabs' too since 'Arab' is not an ethnicity after all. And North African Arabs most certainly.
All of them highly dependent on markets and trade not theocratic ideals, as the fairy tale modern narrative wants to have it.
Olive oil prices on the rise. |
'A-Rab' - without a lord (Rab) or 'lawless.'
Dictators and tyrants are without formally independent laws and they are 'lords unto themselves and all others they dominate.'
This is not substantially a different set-up to what we find today in modern Western politics. Nobody invited Klaus Schwab or von der Leyen (actual birth surname 'Albrecht') or Soros to run governments or to 'treat' government representatives to spa activities at Davos...
They are all tyrannical people in essence.
The death of a market occurs not simply because of the presence of dictators and tyrants who upturn the dynamic of natural supply and demand establishing prices. It happens when there is an insufficiency of money compared to the actual underlying demand for it.
People want to trade but they cannot. There is demand there but it is suppressed.
If you then start to 'manufacture' artificial scarcity on preferred assets and pretend to inject currency to support preferred capital (selective capital asset prices) but there is at the same time genuine scarcity where there is also real demand - then you have the exact recipe for actual market doom.
Because real market agents circumvent the prevailing official structures then and create transfer pricing situations all over the place.
The question is what are the fallout consequences 'if markets die soon.'
But that markets can die you should not doubt at all.
I could tell you what is about to be - but you would not accept it.
And nowhere is it discussed in any media at all. Not in any alt-media places - literally nowhere.
It's easy to shout 'doom and gloom' but it is never so easy that the screamer - the proclaimer, the prophet - puts their finger exactly and precisely on the thing.
On the specific thing which knells the end.
Buy your trophy wine.
It's all I'm saying for now.
Soon there will be another of those free-to-read, effectively 'White Papers' but drawn up as narrative fiction of course. They have to be to get away with what is being said in there. And it will be astonishing. It's all about impossible-to-believe meetings and encounters. LOL. Could not possibly be true.
Some of want 'Aliens.' I give you Aliens but a lot of you just don't get it yet. They are here. Right here under your nose. Here they are. Your only real question should be what do they want from you. So yeah, the coming new 'White Paper...'
And this little piece of music features in it somewhere:
Sugar sugar. A little bit of sugar for you horse-y.