You Know What The Problem Is, Right?

Discussions right across the world today all express views about 'what the problem' is - and so I am presuming that all of you have at least your own personal view about what 'the problem is...'

It simply should not be the case that anyone is particularly bewildered by what is going on.

You did not buy your 'dream mansion' this week and neither did anyone that you know.

Meanwhile, apparently, Bill Gates is a 'billionaire...'

LOL

Whatever that means.

I know at least fifty people by name who I worked with in various arms of half a dozen secret intelligence bodies of various governments around the world from as far back (in my adult life although I was inside a 'program' as a kid because of my parents and what their roles were!) - and all of them had detailed knowledge of 'operating systems' and the internet that IBM was running for the CIA for a godawful long time, before suddenly 'Bill Gates' (do you really think that is his birth name btw!) got given the unique monopoly right to front 'private enterprises' that commercialized a US military invention.

The US Department of State utterly smashed the German 'Amiga' operating software - which was substantially better, cooler running, faster, and with more inherent capacity to grow.

I'm completely drunk right now BTW... I knew this one guy who used to do maintenance on F111's - he had spent a lot of years in those 'permanently operating' C135E's, and he had the bug-red eyes to show for it all...!

His name was Reg Varnevides and he was one of half a dozen guys who filed reports eventually, about picking up communications inside the Boeings while they were flying in them all over the place for long hours, in his case mostly over Vietnam. What was happening was that somehow they 'accidentally' were flicking through digital channels in the middle of the night (even from as far back as back then in the early Seventies), and they would get this 'distinct impression' to go from one specific channel to another, and they would pick up a snippet of voice on one channel, and then another snippet on the next channel and so on. 

This thing was well-known and slightly notorious because the electronics guys were all viewed as 'sleep deprived' at minimum.

Homeless Jennifer Connelly...

Their CO's thought they were quite nuts, of course.

People often think that anyone can decrypt anything. That is simply not the case. There are 'infinity' possibilities of how to mix up a signal if you really want to do that and you have the tools.

At the front end of everything, people always think that, well, just look at it this way - if you massacre a bunch of people because you have the power to do it, bad guys are going to justify what they also did by saying 'we just did what we could do when we had the advantage too; same as you...'

...People presume that ultimate superior force will never obliterate its opposition because it has 'a superior moral code' which prevents it from behaving so brutally. Today's group think enforcement mentality means also, that we cannot really have an open discussion about things like the US Supreme Court.

(Quiet snort). Let's see what happens, though, right?

I confidently tell you this - Reg tells me (not actual Reg the first dude, but current 'Reg') that we are in for a total complete utter disaster tragedy from which there is literally no escape. No one, is getting out of here alive at all.

Except me and you. And that's all. And if you don't 'see' the 'pillar of light go before you,' well, hell boy, you ain't making it out either.

This is not about 'predicting the future.' This is about telling it like it already is right now!

Anyone who seriously does not know what the problem is, please, just say so now, here. I simply don't believe there are many or even any people in that boat.

I would like to know what people think the problem is.

Lunch With 'Bill Smith' And Me

So we go to this Belgian Beer Cafe, see...

D'you wanna hear about this, really?

Was very boring. Not!

We had this new thing on tap, called 'Pirate Life Blonde.'

Floral scented, apricots, orange peel, slight slight cloves, definite vanilla, and so completely well-rounded -  and fresh.

Oh yes, Pirate Life Blonde, Margot Robbie;
Pirate Life Blonde!

Accompanied by medium-rare Scotch steak, with red wine jus in my case, and truffles and butter with our colleague's on these pages sometimes.

And we were not disrupted not even one single time by these staid, strict ET alien people who are currently schooling around 'in the loop' somewhere.

I mention our other 'friends' because well, just look at Chaim Eshed's recent revelation about the Israeli Space Security's having engaged with our friendly visitors from the stars. He did say they are likely to remain hidden though, but, well, they are not being hidden from any of you.

They are a touch pedantic, these 'auslanders.' You're lucky to even get a simple 'no' from any of them when you ask for something they don't want to hand across.

They are 1. not anything like the stupid 'greys' imagery all over the internet. They are very very good-looking, for one thing, if a bit on the 'fine' side. No such thing as a 'thicc' ET, not any that I have been made aware of at least.

Oh Billy Billy Billy. Oh boy, Bill. (LOL)

Even so, they are not all of them anything other than extremely normal, and that is for one thing because they absolutely do 'grow' human DNA 'bodies' in these tube-y things. 

Sometime, this side of Christmas, it will be possible to release a document that describes how you find them, how you interact with them, what they are all about and what they are doing here at all. Which is not to say you will not still have people want to argue about stuff.

But 2., they literally are a little bit dangerous too.

Speculation is one thing, getting involved with the real thing is quite another.

Which is why we should try very hard to confine ourselves to all of these much more easy-to-handle matters like beer, and steak, and money and cars and stuff... ...right?

Nah.

Frank Drebin And The Monsters

So one of our friends here commented earlier that the character of 'Tommy' in Rod Serling's 'The Monsters Are Due In Maple Street' might have been an alien, since he 'knew' there were going to be aliens coming, and so how did he know?

At the end of that story, the aliens talk among themselves about their plan to take over the Earth, one neighborhood at a time.

The interesting dynamic underlying theme to the story itself, is how human societies have a lot of latent tension and that these are quite easy to manipulate and develop into huge fissures within those societies.

All totalitarian states are attempts to suppress those latent tensions and bring the social forces under control through force.

You might as well say - might as well call them - Bolshevik revolutions, also exploit these tensions prior their attempts to install their leaders as the heads of a totalitarian state.

Right now we have this character Gabriel Sterling (not Serling, but Sterling) - of Dominion Voting Machines - and he is pretty much attempting to takes us all into the Twilight Zone.

He's been on the mainstream media very recently, responding to the security video footage of people extracting boxes of documents from underneath black cloth-covered tables at the Georgia count...

1. He simply denied that the vision showed people being told to 'go home' or to 'leave' - even though it is quite clear that that's what happened, since the media there left at the moment it appeared some individual was saying something to everyone present. And so his perspective is that the fact - and it is an evident fact - that there were no observers there, was not due to them being involuntarily removed. 

2. Secondly, he 'by magnetic attraction of his will' declared that even despite any other thing, the amount of votes being counted were not as many as were being claimed, and that therefore, they were not necessarily going to alter the result.

All that he said, amounts to a tugging of the carpet, so to speak, along one side's partisan lines, as against the direction of the tugging, that the other side wishes to go to.

The center course is categorically to simply establish what the objective facts are, yet, that is not what he is intent on doing...

Frank Drebin: 'Nothing to see here,
move along.'

If you go by Gabriel Sterling's wishes, you will choose to infer that because the presumed numbers would not alter the current nominal result balance, then you should not even look too deeply into what went on.

Never a more glib, lurid, and specious essay have I ever witnessed in my life, blatant and brazen, by what amounts to a bank robber, effectively.

See the thing about human life and reality, is that nothing on this planet, not for a long time, has operated on the basis of anyone in any position of power genuinely wanting to seek or go by objective fact: not science, not history, not money, not economics, certainly not politics by any means, and not religion either.

But let's say, that the ET aliens, advanced, amazing, and immensely powerful beings that they are, have formed the view that they can influence and assist human people, one neighborhood at a time - rather than for the purpose of 'taking anything over,' but simply to help those that they can...

Let's just say that, then.

Because if we say that, you won't need to be looking up at the obelisks popping up here and there, and clearly getting media 'purchase' and also quite clearly, man-made things -, in order to 'get' anything valuable for yourself.

I have something for you.

And it is simply 'one neighborhood at a time.' ; )

And it is coming soon.

In 'The Kraken Wakes,' at the end, somewhere between a fifth and an eighth of the entire world population, is left still alive, after the aliens really fully invade. The author of that book, often said that he made a mess of his own plots and got so caught up in things that he wasn't clear he really wanted to end up saying what he had done by the time his publishers went to press with the 'final' story! In the published story, the aliens are gotten rid of when some Japanese scientists come up with this ultrasonic weapon.

My opinion is, that Wyndham must have intuited, afterwards, that the true result of the whole thing - was the catastrophic culling of the human population. You see it's really not so simple as to say that 'oh, we killed off the aliens.' Because, as our friend who made the earlier comment about 'Tommy' said, we can't be so sure who the 'aliens' are - and I would add, especially not if they are really really smart.

At some point in our episode together here, you and I, you will get a feeling deep down inside... And you know what, the whole rest of your life might go along the same old lines of every single other mortal human person on this Earth, except it will not...

You will never ever be the same again.

The aliens - as we have already seen in the US Navy videos - are positioning in the deep seas, not on any rocky, or sandy plateau anywhere.

...Same as in the book by Wyndham.

 

'Socrates In Sickness, Socrates In Health'

If you enter the words in the title of this article into your friendly 'Google Search' bar, you will basically not find the reference to its original source.

Okay maybe your search engine is better than mine, but I was not able to find it.

I happen to know roughly speaking, where it does come from, but let's leave that for the moment anyway; it isn't very important for right now.

There is a famous (or at least, it was famous/infamous) quote made by some historical figure along the following lines: "I have seen the coming man, and he frightens me. He is remorseless, without pity, and he is indomitable. He is a 'superman.' "

I could find that, literally nowhere at all down through many many pages of 'Google-Search.'

...so what is the point, though, of obscuring factual incidents of human history, and covering them over with mountains of propaganda, designed to do what, exactly?

Crimean War cannon - in an Australian
park for some reason...

We all know that Hitler was 'bad.' He was a staggeringly negative force in the world for a while. He was an embodiment of evil, and that is so even if you say that he arose because of highly unjust forces pressing onto Germany at the time. Why attempt to alter the precise truth about him, though?

Many of you older heads here will know why, at least on a certain level - most modern politicians copy, word-for-word, from the political speeches of Adolf Hitler. And that is why you cannot find actual copies or films or audio files of his speeches around much these days.

One would have to be a major level 'conspiracy theorist' though, to suggest that there is this vast systematic scheme or plan, to hide many things, in order for people in power and control to use those same things.

Alas. Such am I, or have I so become step-by-step!

What people think...

If I take a masked, black-hooded thug, brandishing a government-issue machine pistol and wearing ballistic gear, part of fifty such individuals in a gang - and that thug beats an unarmed young woman - is this in any case already 'Hitler's vision of the coming master race??'

Today, right now this evening, we have 'proof-positive' (you know, that thing where complete fools expect FIRST to have a judge make a 'finding of fact' or else 'there is no evidence and it didn't happen,' right...?) that young men in the Australian Army, both took some old and young men from their village houses, as well as came upon some unarmed others out in the open fields, and gunned them down in cold blood; that is, they murdered them.

And tonight, we have the Chinese government, officially posting fabricated pictures on so-called 'social media' of an Australian soldier cutting a baby's throat.

A few years ago, we also had film and sound of a drugged-up ISIS kid, being asked on his wireless: 'Habibi, have you killed them all yet?' ...regarding the fate of some Jewish and American and other tourists in the Oberoi Hotel in Mumbai. And you will not find this attack mentioned today, in the so-called 'time line of ISIS/Al Qaeda terrorist attacks' on Wikipedia.

*

Okay so I specifically want to mention these 'obelisks' now that have popped up here and there around the world. These are man-made things, deliberately placed there. And yes, there was a thing happening beforehand, where a handful of people were calling for some symbolic instance of 'an obelisk' such as the one in Kubrick's first true 'grand opus' movie.

But here is my take...

What people don't think.

Take the Biblical figure of 'Elijah.' Elijah is supposedly the identity who reveals things, restores all things, makes known what was hidden, and who 'must come first to restore all things...'

Well that is not quite, well, exactly how it is though. Actually, what happened in the original narrative, the 'template' as it were, for this whole idea, is that Elijah ONLY gave some 'miraculous' food to this widow woman from a place called Zarephath, even while God withheld food from the whole entire rest of the People of Israel at the same exact time!

Let me go around this another way: any real obelisk is a sign from actual 'advanced beings,' not from RT News stringers operating in the dead of night because they have cottoned onto something!

I mean, okay, in the first place, 'obelisk' is perhaps not even a good 'sign,' since it has been associated in the past with wickedness and the practicing of evil - the people of Atlantis had the obelisk thing at the foot of which, they 'made sacrifices of bulls to Poseidon,' the Goths and the Germanic pagans had their 'Irminsul,' and frankly, even Kubrick's obelisk seems to harbinger some advent of greater weaponry and destructive technology advances in the human species in the movie.

However, slipping back to 'Elijah' for a moment again, he did 'came from another place' (IE 'the Tishbite') and he 'went back up' in some kind of fiery chariot. LOL

No 'obelisks' involved. At least, not as far as revealing a few odds and ends to that woman in Zarephath. 

No. We want some happiness and relative quiet and calm, and maybe some fun, even. No 'bull sacrifices' required.

All the same, you might only have a little wheat and some oil left... Not a lot to work with to 'have some fun.' But - it shall not fail you.

Lady Catherine.

Recently, we all heard Sidney Powell talk about 'releasing the Kraken' and it might well have been just a literary reference. And now there are actual 'close-to-active-military' sources, speaking in the public, currently talking about some covert team of highly skilled, deep cover, and also pretty awesome soldier-types, whose team is called 'the Kraken.' Sounds like a cool idea to me.

Also sounds potentially pretty 'awesome, frightening, remorseless, and without pity.'

You take 'Santa's elves...' They're only tiny little fragile-looking things. And then from there it all depends on if you're 'naughty or nice,' though, right?

What I mean is sure, you can play with elves, but it's not like Hollywood fairy-tales. Real fairy-tales are pretty freaky for the bad people. One hundred and eighty five THOUSAND Assyrians IN ONE NIGHT. Remember what I said. Yes you can ask, and yes you can play. But behave.

Let us remember the grandfather of Lady Catherine Brudenell-Bruce down here, whose ancestor was a leader in the Charge of the Light Brigade - believe me, some things that look fragile, are not.

The title above for this post is about the fact that we are not 'Super-anything;' we are just men, that is, ordinary people, you and me. When we're in great health we think we are super-people. But otherwise, for just right now, we are ordinary folk. 

Why So Much 'Explaining...'

It's certainly possible to post a straightforward series of simple steps, and the next thing you know... ....well.

And then, just like that man-made prism-shaped metal post someone stuck into the sand in San Juan County, Utah, we could just, I suppose look at it, and toss it into the huge pile of other stupid ideas and stupid objects and 'deep, meaningful writings!'

'Anonymous,' in the immediate earlier posted, advanced the idea that people do harmful things because they have a malignant and narcissistic ego or personality, and their strategy is a 'no lose' (for them) thing, because their egos are served even when they are caught, because there's nothing anyone can do about what they already did, and, I think, the proposition also included that they enjoyed openly watching other people twisting in the breeze once, or even when, they were 'caught.'

This is not just a 'valid' idea - it rather well describes what individuals who create a lot of mischief and harm, actually do; and it describes their style and attitude.

I have several reasons for going round and round in seeming circles, almost never getting to the target of what was aimed at. One reasons is that there are those countless mischievous people who want to grab their hands onto dangerous things and turn them around onto you!

My belief is that they are not genuinely intelligent enough to understand, ultimately, what I am saying here...

In the long run.

This is called 'projection mapping.'
Very cool. Only for rich people, though.
You and I can't go there. 

But like any decent modern thermal-tracking or EMF tracking 'hot' missiles, they are still quite capable of following for quite a long way, and only until you 'notch' them, once their fuel and eventually, their energy too has been sufficiently depleted, will they drop off.

Secondly, the whole presence of dedicated mischief here on this planet is entirely systematic, and very very long-term - it's been going on in exactly the same way, around the same basic issues, for a long while.

When you encounter an individual person, you can 'see' their ego at some point. But the 'style,' the methodology and the 'tell-tale footprint' is always the same.

Fundamentally, you will observe that the simple idea always at work, is to create enough space for a person, or the tippy-top of a grand hierarchy of same-minded beings, to slot in where that space was created - by pushing out your sovereign right to have an idea of your own.

If you take the account of 'Doubting Thomas' and his encounter with a proposed humanly-tangible God, Thomas has the idea that he cannot accept the idea of a being in front of him, either literally being the same individual person he saw crucified, or even any person at all and perhaps instead, a phantasm (perhaps an amazingly modern kind of psychological hallucination brought on by the 'outlier' capacities of the ordinary human mind, when pushed to some emotional crisis point...).

And Thomas expresses the idea that were he to put his own physical material hands into the literal physical material wounds of this 'figure,' then his mind would have to re-consider what it was experiencing.

Cartier, Paris - artificial clouds, nighttime.

So we see the fabricators of the Gospels, interestingly make this disturbingly different response to the standard 'power game' profiles, by what they are offering us, is 'God,' by God then telling Thomas that he is allowed to have that viewpoint, and that moreover, He (putative God in this instance), is going to accommodate Thomas' idea.

So either these story-tellers are very clever people, or they are simply relating a fact.

A 'fact' has no reason to have to disguise itself by means of a tactic. It either is a fact, or it is not a fact.

So when you read in Wikipedia what 'Hinduism' is, for example, there is no objective reason for the description in there to contain deception or masking, or hidden semantic qualifiers which shift the meanings of things unnoticed by the unsuspecting.

I could run through a short list of modern public 'philosophers' or at least 'expounders of ideas' and all of them would possess the exact same peculiar habit of telling only one kind of lie:

George Monbiot, Russell Brand, Bernard-Henri Levy, George Soros, Jordan Peterson, even Lionel Nation for that matter - certainly Stephen Fry too and Richard Dawkins...

All of them.

This is what they do - for some odd reason, they want to tell you about the difference between 'non-dualism' and silly stupid primitive ignorant superstition. Same as Wikipedia does.

Thus, when you pick up the Wikipedia entry for John Woodroffe, you will find in there, a statement along the lines that he wrote in English on the 'non-duality' basis of 'Advaita'-ism/Hinduism.

Redpill VR
You can go to a virtual reality dance party

And if you go even to the entry on 'Hinduism' itself, you will again find a continued assertion that a major strand of this religion (it is not a religion at all...) is the concept that only Brahman exists as one single non-dualistic thing.

And then, if you go to any of the almost 2 billion Muslims on the planet, you will once again, encounter the idea that 'Tawhid' is the teaching that 'God is One;' and that Islam is a monotheistic religion. And yes, that is indeed what they all believe - except that is not what the word says or means...

The word means 'to unify' - in fact, it specifically, grammatically, is 'the act of unifying, bringing together.' And what can you bring together if there is only 'one' of it?

So - Tawhid does not mean what modern Muslims think it means.

'Advaita' is arguably, to Sanskrit scholars, not even a word that means 'not dual,' but rather, 'not multiple devas.'

Again, the real basis of Indian classical religious beliefs is the existence of a materially-governing deity Shiva, but who was activated by another Supreme Deity altogether - namely - Adi Shakti.

'Shaktism' specifically is a whole entire range of female divinities within the apex leadership of 'Adi Shakti'

Neon art

There is no monotheism in 'Hinduism.' At all. And that's even if you just use the word in the erroneous way that a lot of modern people do - to imply that it is the 'religion' of the peoples of the Sub-Continent of India. But you try and convince modern people in India of this.

Thomas Aquinas misquoted early Greek texts about the so-called monotheistic 'First Cause' and this gives the path to later spouters like Stephen Fry, the chance to attack this false antithesis on the grounds of modern 'scientific reasoning' and broader concepts about human moral philosophy (Fry accuses 'God' of being a primitive, malign, sadistic, tyrant).

The whole of Stanford University's religious and early philosophy curriculum, is based on the entirely false idea that Aquinas accurately quoted the primary Greek texts; but he did not.

You can get a handful of University degrees - just like Reza Aslan, for example - and spout forth all kinds of nonsense and everyone must be obliged to listen to you.

Is all of this 'just a mistake' that happened over and over never to have been corrected even the once, down through two and a half thousand years?

If I give you a method, let's say, taught to me in a Kung Fu school in Canton, for you to stick your hand right through a concrete wall - in the words of Christian Prince: 'what you will do?'

I was talking with this Jewish rabbi just this week, and as he was propounding some impressive ideas about the Greeks and Western ideas, and how Hebrew ideas challenged those but hadn't succeeded in overpowering them - he came out with this interesting perspective about the comparison between 'the Greek mind' and 'the Jewish mind:'

He said - the Greeks proposed that what you could not see, was not real; and that they had challenged the Jews saying 'well, did Moses actually see God? Have any of you seen God with your actual eyes?'

Whereas - so the Jewish rabbi continued - the Hebrew mind identified the realm of invisible ideas as being as real, probably more real, than merely the passing materially tangible world of things.

There's any amount of speakers on ET aliens, metaphysical things, chakra activation ('cleansing,' and 'balancing...!' LOL), Hindu mantras, Islamic Jinn mysteries, Christian spiritual-ism, Hebrew occultic practices.

None of them will show you how to plunge your hand hand right through a material wall and come out the other side without any harm or effect on your own body (as in, 'ouch!').

None of them will show you how to turn water into wine.

None of them will show you how to find a 'burning bush' that will talk to you.

But all of them want your attention.

Because they all say, that the realm of intangible ideas, is as important as engineering and mathematics and material physics.

And Stephen Fry and Wikipedia will tell you, by the same token, that although there 'may be' an ultimate reality, there is only one of it, it's 'the Singularity' and whatever you think, it will never ever belong to you, you cannot command it, and after all, fancy being so egotistical to think you could do, and you will never grasp it or understand it fully (they always produce the qualification of 'fully')...

...but perhaps, if you just make way for them, make some space for them and their ideas, and for the institutions that stand behind them, then all will be well with you.

Otherwise, you're going to get hurt. By them.

Got it?

This is a power thing.

Evil is about power. Power over you.

This is a place in Svalbard,
where they are stockpiling seeds, 
in case of a global catastrophe. Nice.

My comprehension of some strange and outlandish things, is that, for sure you can grasp them yourself, and wield the powers that go along with all of that - but the others who are already there before you or I, also have a say in what goes on, and maybe we should make some attempt at coming to terms with who they are, what they are like, and what they don't like and might respond and react violently to. To be in that circle, you have to be like them.

You have to be 'Tawhid.'

And I guarantee you, there ain't two billion of them out there! There's maybe like, two hundred. Just one of them single-handedly, can slaughter eighty thousand in one night. You wanna play with these guys?

I'll show you. No problem.

You will see with your eyes, feel with your hands, eat and drink with your tongue and mouth with them too, if you like.

But is it time, Morgiana? Is it time?

Don't know. Not sure.

There's plenty down here in the box though. Plenty of stuff. Life is long. LOL