The Sacred 'Loc-Nar'

So this is an interesting 'framing device' to what I was intending to post in this article anyway.

The 'Sacred Loc-Nar' is this green orb thing, of varying size, but always green and glowing, that holds the original 1981 adult cartoon film of the classic French comic 'Metal Hurlant' (Heavy Metal). In the movie story segments, each mini-story turns on someone having 'found' this strange, mystical, as well as powerful, green object - which virtually always becomes the cause of some major disaster for those who find it.

The adult comic movie, supposedly made in Canada, is quirky (well, it's from a French comic book, after all!), but it's also brilliant. And it's a cult classic. Wikipedia and all other historical records of note now say that the movie was directed by Gerald Potterton, but in fact it was produced by Ivan Reitman (who nowadays says he 'only part produced it') and directed by Robert Altman who went to great lengths to distance himself from it altogether.

Altman hated it. And Reitman more or less disclaims it.

The key writer Dan O'Bannon, is a genuine genius, who wrote the movie 'Alien.' He, together with cartoonist Richard Corben, had been submitting work to the French Adult Comic Magazine Metal Hurlant, a magazine being published in Paris by the cartoon art genius 'Moebius.'

Heavy Metal 1981 comes across in some sense as a 'left-over' piece from the Sixties' cultural mindset, but then, the mindset of the adults in the Sixties, who were of course, in the first place not 'Sixties people' themselves but from an entirely earlier generation, is likewise an earlier one. Yet it radically overcomes all of the Sixties' failure of intellect and produces extraordinarily insightful but also confronting and not politically-correct philosophical arguments.

Altman always wanted to be regarded as a serious director and he never was that, certainly not of any note in the way that he wished to be perceived - which was as another Scorsese, at minimum.

Temple of the Sacred 'Loc-Nar.' LOL
From the movie...

Anyway the point re what I was going to try and get at here, is that there is a certain 'twisted quirkiness' in real life, and this 'adult cartoon' arguably captures it well enough. Altman didn't think so, neither did Reitman.

The 'twisted quirkiness' is this: ...well, why? But why?

And what you will only find, across almost every single major 'religious philosophical understanding,' for instance, is this kind of thing: they will go all the way through clearly rational and valid and testable, sound hypotheses, but then swerve away at the end, into a kind of a 'reality gone missing,' or a 'missing reality' which they say is real, but simply cannot be established in material reality as a fact. Like this, here: (take the modern Veda interpretations - not the actual Vedas, by the way, just the way people want to say that they are...). Your five senses are misleading, and so when you activate your 'Kundalini' you suppress the quality of illusion that is produced by your five senses, and you will 'see' the Universal 'reality' in a 'pure' spiritual way, and then after you do that deeply and successfully, you will see everywhere and into everything spiritually, and you will abandon your material life... Literally, they will say 'abandon.'

Strange, green liquid... What is it? (More LOL, just joking,
okay? Cleans your hands, doesn't do anything else).

Well now, see, when you were a small child, you had your five senses, and then you grew up, and the processing your brain did of what those senses brought you was more complex, and more complexity was there in your experiences, and you saw that life was more complex... ...and yes sure it involved disappointment, but to switch into manufacturing a stance on that disappointment by accusing it of only being part of a total illusion, is a self-justification, a rationalizing, of failure; it's not a recognition of any kind of external reality at all. It's an internal intellectual position. Now you can 'handle' external reality all you want that way, yes you certainly can, but that doesn't 'make it actually so.'

So I was going to 'quickly' add on top of the recent direction of discussions here, that no, I am not saying 'water-into-wine' metaphorically, although it can be that too. I am saying actual drinkable wine. Otherwise what's the point? You're either God, or you ain't god; stop pulling our legs.

You see, I am being confronted by the NASA stuff, in which there is every scientific and empirically testable reason to conclude that there are much more advanced intelligent species around the place, many of whom are literally themselves (we're not, they are) capable of traveling the vast distances to here. And, they do it.

And this introduces, not so much religious philosophy aspects (although it does also do that on one level), but this idea about complexity.

My conclusion is that if you merely take the same natural course and direction of what you yourself experienced growing from a child to a much older and more experienced adult, all that will happen is that your appreciation of the complexity of what your senses are telling you, about life and about all of the dynamics in there, reaches various thresholds, and you go past them into more enhanced ways of looking at things.

Strange green dress... What is this?! Take it off,
at once!

Now why would it be that you then suddenly turned backwards, and snuffed out what had been serving you perfectly well up until this second, in order to replace all of it with a hypothetical 'spiritual' other sense that no one can 'see' and that you yourself cannot 'see' but only 'imagine,' really. Sure they want to say 'oh but it is a spiritual, therefore non-material form of seeing...' It's not any kind of seeing; it's delusion.

If you go to the mainstream Christian mentality, it isn't any different. It's all 'spiritual.' If you go the Islamic it's precisely the same. Pie in the sky, when you die; jam yesterday and jam tomorrow, but never jam today.

Listen, the word in the New Testament about what 'descended down onto them forcibly' is not 'dove' although it can be taken to say 'a dove' in Greek. 

Here we at last get some truth out of Wiki. They actually mention the word might be coming from the Semitic 'bird of Ishtar' but that 'makes it only worse' (I mean it makes my point even more cuttingly). The word in Genesis is 'Ishsha,' which is not translated at all into English, and you will see the footnotes there about that. They don't translated it either because they don't know what it means, or means to say, or 'they' do and won't say. 

See, for sure there is an implication of the word part 'aster;' star.

So I'm telling you, explicitly, we are dealing with something here that virtually no one has ever talked about properly, either from the ancient texts in any culture, but specifically for the Western mind, from the Judaeo-Christian texts -, and it is definitely not 'spiritual' as in completely incorporeal, and unseen. Although, yes for sure, there is the not plainly visible, as well as the stuff CERN is working on, namely, Neutrinos and 'invisible Universal particle lines,' and there certainly is moral and absolute reality 'Spirit.' There are all of those things; IE extreme complexity. 

Who actually got close to this in a recent YouTube channel dissertation was the prominent modern Islamic scholar Mufti Abu Layth. And that's because he's using the great Arabic Aristotelian texts as his sources.

But we are dealing with the 'quirky,' and also the intelligent 'other' person/individual conscious agent/agency. You can't push this around, in the same way you might, say a subservient intellect - this is a much higher intellect than we are, or than we have been. They're not going to be pushed around the way we humans all like to push those we overpower, around.

No advanced alien intelligence would be either, and we cannot expect them to be. Would they get so pissed off that they whack us in the head at some point, or just benevolently look down patronizingly, and disregard as? 

Very patronizing. WTF is that BTW, he is holding; betcha
he doesn't even know, and that's because he's an actor.
Prolly he thinks it's a scarf, an expensive scarf.

You cannot, just go doing a bunch of 'Kundalini' yoga and then somehow enter some exorbitantly advanced intellectual standing, without breaching through the reality of what that would be in your ordinary sensory context.

You cannot, do a bunch of 'chakra spinning' practices, and suddenly spin your way out of the human social context and messiness in there.

Judaeo-Christianity is a bit peculiar, frankly, because - well, a lot of deep ancient texts are - there are words in there which mean quite different things to what we commonly think that they do mean, and different to how we traditional 'take them' to mean: for example, the Jewish texts like the Zohar and so on, say 'columbarium' (like a dovecot), and also 'Palace of the Bird's Nest,' and in the New Testament, they say 'where the Eagle nests...'

How would they, for instance, back in those days, describe, say Darth Vader's 'Death Star?' Well okay I'm saying Death Star! Maybe we could say 'Life Star.' 

Waddya think? Any some good this one mayt? (As my Serbian Chicago Comex boss used to say to me when he had a winner and wanted to feign being a stoopid ignorant Slavic backwoodsman). 

Occult Technology

If you fly a machine in through sophisticated, mostly Russian or Chinese-made radar domes these days, it is something occult.

'Occult' just means hidden, right?

'Trigonometry' - and people tend to say it like 'trigger-nometry' - is about the angle relationships of tri-angles.

Looking for something very important

The most tricky thing about trigonometry is the fact that two-dimensionally, it can appear that some axis point is linear, whereas in actuality of several dimensions, these 'points' are depicting an orbital dynamic - maybe waves, frequencies, rotations, ellipses. It gets really complicated when you want to start looking at things that do have 'triangular' characteristics but which are not regular 'triangles' as such, like for instance, an ice-cream cone.

Looking at something in only two-dimensions when that thing has shape and mass and thickness, involves 'occult' angles, 'occult' lines.

The old-fashioned cathode ray tube is a lot like this: it takes data from three-dimensions and composes them into a two-dimensional screen image. But even so, it is the data signal clarity which in the first place is absolutely crucial to getting an image at all. So 'broadcasts' involve discrete wavelength transmissions - this is so that no outside 'static' (IE meaningless, data-irrelevant) energy is introduced into the input at the receiver end.

In the New Testament Jesus Christ has his apostles sent to follow some 'bearer of a jug of clear water' to the upper rooms of the wealthy Cleophas' place. And, at the marriage celebration, he also asks

Chopard 'High Jewellery.'

for jugs of very clear water.

It's all about the clarity of the medium, and then the flow of something which is quite clear.

The modern human mind is filled with rubbish. There is generally speaking nothing but static in there; there is so much external energy invading your brain, not so much your neural senses (taste, touch, sight, sound, proprioception, so on) because these are easily handled by the brain itself, and filtered into the appropriate data streams. No, it is the fact that the actual sent 'coherent' signals that other people give you, are themselves rubbish - that is, people are sending you nonsense disguised as communication.

So you are -  maybe not you, but people are - responding therefore to 'information-action-response' paradigms but where the information is deeply suspect as truly important for you.

Somewhere else in the New Testament it says something about widows or older women if they get too involved with getting pleasure and comfort from the world apparent around them, are only entertaining what is dead. 

'Dead' is perhaps not exactly the right word, but the passage was comparing the 'world' the ordinary material world, with some other world.

However when you go out into the broad public streets, by which I mean to say any place there are people, a lot of people going about 'their daily affairs' - you are looking at what is already dead. Sure it moves, it speaks, it can answer your questions, but in fact it is not intelligently alive in any enduring form...

Wine is just flavors, sugar, acetic acid, and alcohol. And water.

Looks like one of these 'new' amber wines

It is the composition of the components that makes the difference between any old thing, including the infamous and lethally toxic 'wood alcohol' that rural Slavs make and regularly kill themselves drinking... ...and say, Terroir wine. 
  
I can tell you a hundred thousand times and in many different ways, that you should experience, um... ...say, I dunno, what? Satisfaction. Or, fulfillment. Security. Happiness.

When you go looking for great investments, and they accumulate some money and your stack builds up, then maybe you can add 'wealth.' Is that a feeling? Well there is an internet meme that goes something like 'money can't buy you happiness but it is better to be rich and unhappy, than poor and miserable.'

But I think you absolutely need a clear signal, a clear data stream, and one that is carrying actually relevant information, before you are going to actually experience anything enduring and which is truly 'alive' in the sense that your mind is seeking for.

You're looking for 'alive.' You will find and secure no real joy, if it is not exactly that quality of experience...

Atlantis, you will recall, was not destroyed because the people there were wealthy and powerful, but because their extreme wealth and power no longer sat well on their shoulders.

When you look around you, wherever you are, wherever you may be, at first you think you might like to have many friends, or just any friends(!), you may even concern yourself with romantic liaisons, or partner/s.

What happens if you come to a realization that these people are all dead, or if not dead exactly, then sleeping, dormant like in some fairy tale or mythical narrative?

What makes me say they are dead? 

If they are not living in joy they are dead.

And you will, to your amazement, find that dead people, joyless dead people, have this agitation nonetheless about them to incessantly 'get' something, and to have you also rush about striving after something that you need to 'get.'

That's the human race - 'Sleeping Beauty,' 2020AD.

What will you need to get? At any time will it be for them to clear their minds of the drivel inside there? Never. It will never be that.

You just get things, more things, expensive things, even impossible things, and then, everything will be fine and you will be loved. Or at least respected. That is the human race. If only Xi Jinping can get, the Ladakh border region from India, if only Iran can get, some nuclear weapons, if only if only if only. And they need to get, you to comply with their desires, to get.

And then, after around a hundred years each of them, they all die.

So they must strive to get, quickly. Because they all need to have, before time runs out for them and they die and go to nothingness.

The only thing you need to get, is clarity to wash through whatever is clouding your vision.

We will never be able to calculate the inner angles of spinning triangles traversing an ellipsoid path as fast as some juvenile from another much more advanced planet - and that is partly because we don't even have the formulas to do it, although we certainly have the calculators on our iPhones.

Some juvenile. That's where we're at. You can tell yourself all day long that you know what you really want in life, what is good for you, what your 'religious ideology' and all else is all about - and these kids will turn you out so fast your head will spin. And most of you reading will have to look on-line for the 'urban slang dictionary' to know what I just said. I know what I said, and I meant it, and that is because I have had a little peek into what is going on 'outside.'

  

Exclusively; Women ONLY!

Yeah how are we going to stop the guys, right?

I'm not telling who is writing this article.

If you go 'taking off the masks' because some professor of psychology wants you to unveil your authentic, true self - do you know what you will find?

...That your personality, your 'authentic self' is made up of a lot of real memories and experiences that you have had. You will find only suffering, pain, disappointment, and misery in there, mostly.

Monroe no, um, er, no make-up.

Is that what you want to show to everyone?

And so then the theory is that people you want to love you will, what, respond to your dire personal life circumstances? Because they have no means to respond to anything else...?

We are not going to tell you about the way certain people just 'toy with' the world of human beings. Not here, and not openly.

We know what you seek. A lot of people do.

Just imagine a group of people, all of whom have nothing but sad experiences. So here you are, with your boyfriend, husband, friend, so on and so forth, and they are casting their eye over some other individual... ...who is, as you well guess, just another person filled with sadness inside, disappointment, and failure. And just like you do, they also most certainly deserve 'rescue;' a form of rescuing anyway. So that means you are looking at the potential of your own 'failure' one more time. And you get angry. Exactly, as indeed you should too.

Now modern social programming wants to tell you - 'you are resilient, you are strong, what makes you worthy is that you bounce back.'

Oh yeah yeah yeah. ...Until you are - 'not resilient no more.' 

And then - the bin for you. It's all over. So sure, you just keep on sucking up that specious 'social programming' - go on, why don't you.

The cost of great - and I do mean great - handbags, goes like this: Chanel Tartan or Tweed around $1,500, Prada around $1,800, and then the rest go up from there and are too expensive, really. Not that you should turn one down when your check account says 'it is possible!'

94 this month. Happy Birthday month, Marilyn.

A good handbag will make you feel great.

But now I want you to ask yourself, what would make Marilyn Monroe experience joy?

Trust me, this is the thing in the old ancient books called: 'Socrates in health, Socrates in sickness...' Is he still 'Socrates?'

The human race - you - are a being somewhere between abject misery and suffering, and joy. You can never be 'Socrates in absolutis.' Um, well, that is, you ca-a-a-n, b-u-u-t...

What is going to make you experience joy? And can you hang around with other people who are in the mode of joy. What is joy?

The Vedic texts on the experiential bases of the human consciousness, say that there are 114 'chakras' in total (there is some discussion that there is one more than... some mysterious thing...) and that for a 'normie' human being to feel utter satisfaction in this life, they require only 21 of these to be functioning. How many you got 'functioning?' Right now.

The Sanskrit word 'Akasha' (and don't look at Wiki or Google, they tell lies or they proliferate rubbish) means 'the Axis:' the functioning 'up and down forever, into Infinity' of the intelligence of the Cosmos. It means 'axis,' or crossing-point. You 'break the cross-point' and no one is connected then, certainly if you break yours no one is connected to you, nothing is cohesive, and you get chaos.

'Joy,' is, there is only one such thing.

Real thing, not photo-shopped.

There is only one such mind that beholds it. You take off your 'masks,' and then empty yourself of your own ego (that responds with anger or desire to who and what is outside you) and your necessary personality and you are in big trouble, let me tell you - you will not be 'resolving' your 'issues' or any of your problems.

There is only one 'Axis.' Your axis is the same as Marilyn Monroe's. Your are not the same personality, but you are the same person. And that is the nuclear bomb power of the so-called 'Latent Female Energy' of a particular, much storied sort of Yoga that plenty of people think they are 'doing' especially out in L.A.

There is no word 'tree' in the Book of Genesis - it is 'Xylon,' and this means 'X'-ylon: axis of life, or of the living.

Okay? In Hebrew they want to say 'Ess.' Which can mean 'sheaves taken together,' or 'shaft.' It means 'inner core.' 

The Xylon is a great huge shaft apparently of some kind of light, leading up into the highest reaches of Heaven, from the lowest reaches thereof, which is 'merely' 'the Paradise (Garden).' The 'Paradise' part is probably from a Persian root word; modern day Iran...

Boom!

Yesterday, the Parchin nuclear research facility in Iran was destroyed by some 'little white flying things.' And the Iran government is starting an investigation now, of what happened. Dunno why they want to 'launch an investigation' now. I told y'all it was going to happen months ago. Not to worry though, I'm sure the Iranians also have University professors who know everything. That is why they look into the doors flying open after the horse has bolted.

Make sure you don't get yourself caught in the misery of the world of human relationships.  At best these people are using less than twenty per cent of what any kinds of advanced intelligent being is going to be using. And you want the handbag, don't you? Take the handbag. It's nice. You'll like it. It's good.

And do you think they have designer handbags out there in that 'Paradise' place? For myself, my joy would not be complete without those things. How about you?

Come Fire, Come Fire...

I should not make fun of this, not laugh about it - it isn't funny.

So, I got dragged to this mainly female-attended lecture, or maybe, presentation/discussion, by a fairly well-credential academic psychologist. The subject was 'masks that people wear and the pain of relationships.' ...I take it the context was modern relationships, and particularly those that women were having, or at least looking at things from the female perspective. Mmn... maybe a female perspective.

But I'd have to say I have heard more or less the same ideas coming from men and expressed in different words but amounting to the same thing.

Computer game future parkour character - 'Faith Connors.'

This woman, very intelligent, very qualified via academic degrees and so on - no children, never had any either natural or adopted - was going to explain some deep things. She said she was being honest in saying that she had been, probably still was to some extent, a violent person and someone who had experienced a lot of pain... ...from her bf (whether those in the past or the current one) flirting with other women. And so she lashed out and was violent and angry.

Going back to the recent previous discussions here on this Blog, I am going to slightly 'walk back' what I said about being able to discover your 'eyes' over about six months. That is not completely correct. You don't need to wait any time at all. Either you do or you don't, right away, or you will or you won't, right away. First comes the immediate recognition (we'll get into the process in some detail later). But in all events we are not talking about 'visions' or 'dream segments' or any kinds of hallucinations. You 'open your eyes' you see everything there is to see. Any baby will tell you though, that when they first open their eyes, bright lights can be blinding, and many images are indistinct to begin with but they after a while come into clear focus, and even then you can't always understand what they are... ...because you're a baby! Still. At that time.

It's the act of opening your eyes, finding your optical capabilities, not any other sort of thing that is somehow a conditional matter (as most esoteric 'illumination' seems to be). It doesn't take six months to 'open your eyes.'

Scientist Wahabis that talk about metaphorical 'inner vision' or 'dream sequences,' or hallucinations when it comes what we are referring to here - are being dishonest. They are deliberately talking about something that we are not talking about, and pretending to not look at what we are talking about. To be oblivious of its existence.

And I am skeptical of a woman who, not actually middle-aged though nearing it, and without the experience of having raised children, is going to tell human beings about the pain of relationships, or the problems of relating, and then is proposing to give you answers and solutions. In the event of this presentation, she more or less suggested that people wore masks that covered their true selves, and these were put on to accommodate expectations of parents, or society, of a range of other things especially (from what I could gather from what she had said) the false spiritual ideas of religions. It sounds right...

Anyone who has had children will tell you that life is not about having things, possessing boyfriends, or girlfriends, or husbands or wife - it is about children, having and raising children, and nothing else at all, because we are all children and when we get old and die, we are children still; we die 'as children' entering something else, some place else: entering 'nothingness,' or entering Jannah where the men will have 82 virgins... Why I say 'children' or 'as children' because it is clear we know nothing beforehand, right? Those who say 'nothingness' cannot prove it, and neither are those who say 'Jannah (with 82 virgins)' able to prove that either.

So.

So...

Now... But you are moving away from the state of being a 'children' - you know, one of those stupid things that have a handful of University degrees, and who with depression dripping from every word off their tongue, lecture you about what they know and what is true.

Er, don't attempt 'parkour' after you have had a couple
of these things, especially not these size of them!

This woman's import mainly was that she feared being left alone (since the guy was flirting with other women) and she suppressed her anger and perhaps even rage, by putting on masks, until at some point she exploded into violence. And she said she 'feared being left/left alone' because she believed she was not 'good enough' somehow - or maybe, in the eyes of the boyfriend or husband that she 'had...' (aka 'possessed,' was attempting to possess; my diacritics).

Well in the Jannah, this guy is not going to merely be flirting with the 82 virgins, although admittedly, how they get to be 'virgins' again each morning is a bit beyond me, because I have no experience of this particular place. 

The only Jannah I know, there are no virgins in that place.

Okay but I fully say that everything this woman was saying was 100% completely valid. And there is the problem the human race has, see - they say stuff which is true, and then they pretend they know for sure what the answer is and then they go around and lecture people and make up rules and establish conditions and all kind of stuff.

What is true about what she said was that she felt bad, at some point. That is a true statement she made. Everything after that point was absolute rubbish. And that is why I resorted to being stupid myself and bringing in the silly 82 virgins things to shove it into the mindsets of the others in the hall, just to be irritating. Because let me tell you, these people irritate me too! LOL

I mean you can't seriously say you have an answer and then demonstrate depression in the tone of your voice, and in the lip shaking, teary-eyed demeanor and delivery.

You don't have an answer if you do that kind of thing.

So what's the answer? Eh, Jesus, what's the damn answer. 

You open your eyes and you'll find out.

This Blog is addressed to women every bit as much as to men - you open your own eyes and you just tell me (well, you don't need to tell me; you can tell yourself) what you see. And then you deal with the reality whatever way you choose. Not my problem.

Watch the vid. below, read the lyrics, understand that there is stuff going on 'under the radar' 'behind the scenes,' all the time. When Dr Jim Green, NASA chief scientist, says they are getting close to announcing discovery of ET intelligent life, he isn't joking around. He goes on to say 'and there will be extensive consequences.' There won't be any of those.

Because most of this world is filled with idiotic 'children,' and they will continue insisting they want to remain as idiotic children. What about you?

After you absorb the lyrics, I will post another video of the same track, more or less, but without the lyrics on-screen. And it will be in a slightly different tempo with some alterations...

"Don't It Always..."

The thing that all scientist Wahabis say - I call them Wahabis of Science, because they are exactly that lunatic - is this:

'The structured hallucinatory experience comes about because of fragments of memories, that are brought together to compose what appear like new experiences.'

This statement, introduced as a way of encapsulating unusual or exotic forms of 'vision' that are reported widely, across all times, all cultures - is both unscientific and it is a form of propaganda.

Teddy Roosevelt statue

Agreed, there are dreams that people have, and people try to 'interpret' these, and there are even cultural and modern systems of trying to do that. And there most certainly are drug-induced experiences, visions and perceptions too.

To take anecdotal evidence - which still is evidence, 'da'if' though it may be although sometimes too, it is not weak and it is relied upon to send a man to the death cell - and then leap to the conclusion that such evidence (in this case spoken about here) that all of these reports consist of, are composed fragments of memories... ...is sheer nonsense in the first place but it is a major leap of logic even were it to be true in terms of the actual reported accounts.

The recent June 17 (2020) Senate Committee led by Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), asks the Defense Department in partnership with intelligence agencies to make unified, co-ordinated and public, the collecting and analyzing of unidentified aerial phenomena reports.

But you see, according to science Wahabi'sm, all of these reports are compositions of other phenomena, which only make it appear as if...  So why waste the taxpayer's time, right?

There are well very well-publicized programs and projects in the past, funded by intelligence agencies as well as Defense - such as those involving Russell Targ and also Ingo Swann, plus a handful of Research Universities - which entertained some of the more exotic 'mind exercises' that would fit in with the Wahabi science version about 'composed hallucinations.'

So I'm going to tell you up-front that shortly, after a little while now, the government is going to strongly intimate, that there is a possibility, that advanced alien intelligent beings, are engaging and broadly-speaking also acting, to assist the USA - and its peoples, mess state though they are seemingly in - but that no one is in a position to demand or to coerce these beings to 'show up' on command, or even on 'nice request,' necessarily.

And the reason for that is two-fold: firstly, it is simply the way it is, and secondly, it offers a considerable problem to foreign competitor nations, or opposing sovereign interests, in that they are being told they are 'up against a lot more than they imagine.' And that, in any case, is also true (even if we leave out the 'advanced aliens' part).

You can of course, certainly just put it all down to tactics and strategy. But it's not my position on the matter.

Wahabis would like to destroy this -
this is the Temple of the Goddess of Wisdom

I don't want to go into 'mind exercises' as such. And here is the reason why:

The point is not to 'see visions.' In dreams or structured hallucinations be they from the use of chemicals or 'techniques.' Which is what Science Wahabi'sm wants to say that this is exclusively about. 

The point is to open your eyes in order to see.

The point is to be able to open your inner eyes in order to see, to find your inner ears so that you can listen and hear, to locate your senses of taste and touch and all else - so that you are able to see and experience the whole reality, of what you may find, and not just scattered odds and ends of 'dream moments.'

You can 'remember' snatches of classical music, and you might not, unless you are a musician, even know which works the phrases are part of... ...you will never be able to 'dream' the whole entirety of Beethoven's, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Symphonies. 

And if you do though, this is clearly not the same thing as a structured hallucination 'composed' by bits and pieces of brain-archived memory. In any case it will not be 'a dream.'

In ordinary daily waking life, we open our eyes, and direct them to look wherever we choose. 

I hate to say this to people who want to employ drugs to achieve some kind of hyper-vision, but all these are doing is closing down the paths that clog up your conscious cognition with the base five sense inputs. I mean, you will for instance, in any event definitely be using 'drugs' if you have a pain somewhere that is taking up your attention. You may be the best yogic technician on the planet, but if you have a headache it is going to give you some trouble when you try to 'meditate!!' Take a panadol or aspirin or whatever.

'Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've
got till it's gone...' The Wahabis have their ordinary senses, until
they're dead. Same with you too. But what do you intend to do about it?
Wahabis scientists are not going to get you anywhere then. Open your eyes now. 

Yes some of the extreme chemicals also distort or even accentuate 'normal' sense inputs too. This is not 'opening your other eyes.' The only thing drugs and chemicals manage to achieve, is give someone a rapid sensation outside of the normal sensory ones - and that, makes it acceptable to the rational mind that, okay well, yes, something different is going on.

And that is not what we are talking about. Although the mere acceptance in the rational thinking mind, is a beginning, but again, it can also be quite misleading too, because it raises the question of 'beginning of what?'

Wahabi science does not accept. And from that insistent stand-point it moves away from the objective observational, and will keep that in a fog of untouched non-discovery forever more if you let those guys. 

The problem - one of the huge problems - with failing to find your real 'eyes' is that advanced alien intelligent beings all know Beethoven really really well...

They are exactly that sophisticated as a casual thing.

When you go through the neural network firing patterns that are made from your senses comprehending (in your brain and extended nerve system) something like the long form of a classical symphony, or the molecular spin dichroism of olfactory constellations (old original Chanel No 5, for instance) - advanced intelligent beings are able to 'see' what is going on in your brain because the rhythms, wave forms, frequencies, are all commensurable structural patterns that are coherent, measurable, and able to be communicated with, by their language forms.

When Stalin killed a lot of people on purpose, was it possible to 'see' what his emotions were, and how these synced up with what his brain patterns were? Of course, it would have been if we could have attached a CT machine to his brain at the time. 

It's important to see, observe, and understand what someone's emotions are, compared to their neural activity in all the parts of their brain structures.

How do we do these things? Do them properly? Well we could start by just going by the old accounts of how...

...Deep into a dark silent cave, out in the lonely desert, in an enclosed room. First shut out all the external stimulus. Shut down the gross senses. 

There may be a more complex formal way of doing things. It can still take a damn long time. Six months, minimum. More, even. And maybe though, a whole lot less too depending. 

My approach has been to introduce or to surreptitiously 'slip in,' highly visceral yet also complex sound structures.

While you are jumping around to the demands, which take up your sense channels (as the Boeing chief engineers calls it 'widely claimed sense channels!'), of ordinary 'normal' daily life, you will be pushed off from trying to close these channels down in order to open up and focus on the other ones that you have.

See, get this point because this is really important - Senator Marco Rubio is asking for something - and well, yes, there 'may well be' friendly 'people' asking for something along somewhat similar lines too. But if both sides are not really speaking the same linguistics, I'll not say 'language,' then it is quite difficult and time-consuming getting the dumb ones to know just what the hell (or heaven) is quite going on...

When you begin to have the eyes to see, you will notice...

Some architect! 

It takes a simply massive amount of energy to get here from 'elsewhere' and none of these events is undertaken lightly or without strict beneficial purpose. Whereas Wahabi scientists (who are really non-scientists) say one thing - and they insist on it too - the CERN Large Hadron Collider is already proceeding under the understanding that it is possible to send data backwards in time via some kind of effect available in the supersymmetry hypothesis. And CERN comes at a cost of a stated higher than 10 billion dollars, and I will tell you, that the budget is over a 100 billion and that it is for all practical purposes unlimited; and there are a 100 countries participating currently.

Trust me, we can do it here, with the help of some 'friends' for no money at all or not much money to speak of. And the likelihood is that no one else on the planet is going to 'participate...' And nor are they going to perceive any benefits to them directly. So it's just 'a game' right. A little private game in a little on-line back-water among a little private club, effectively.

Here is the second Cassavetes Tempest trailer: