I THINK EVERY ECONOMIC COMMENTATOR OF
ANY KIND OUGHT TO SAY WHAT MUSIC HE OR SHE LISTENS TO...
It would give you a stark perspective
from which to ajudge their mind culture.
For this post I shall give you three
that I listen to for your own consideration about what it can all
mean or imply:
(You can see them all on YouTube).
Lola Astanova – Rachmaninov's
Movement Musicaux Opus 16 #
5.
Above and Beyond
pres. OceanLab – 'If I could Fly.'
Three Drives – 'Letting You Go'
Greece 2000 (Dabruck Klein Vocal Radio Edit).
It's from the last of these that the
following words occur:
“You can say what you want to/Cry me
a river if you need to/Go put my name in a tattoo/and you can spin me
lies if they come true...”
The last line has complex possible
meanings and I approve of it. The problem with 'Jesting Pilate' is
that he never stayed around to hear the answer to his infamous
question.
The name of the game in the financial
media today appears to be the spouting of data to justify a
prognostication. I have a view that the G30 itself essentially
consists of manufactured credentialists, driven from a long time ago
by strong and powerful political elites in countries where democratic
transparency has never existed – let's be kind and say: 'never
properly existed...'
Nobody is prepared to contradict the
'data' and the spun versions of economic ground truth (as
Rumsfeld might say) from groups or people speaking from the platform
of G30 membership.
The fifteen seconds of fame and the
mantle of the fifteen-second 'wise guru' that is the reward of the
damned souls of economic limbo and tv-land virtual reality, includes
all of the members of the G30.
To put it simply, my own view is that
right now, they have no clue.
And it's not a good idea to steer your course by anything they might
say.
Certainly they have massive effects on
markets of all kinds from moment to moment daily, but that is the
same thing as the falling man claiming to be flying as he drops past
the 12th floor of a 13 storey building. Actuality, is
critically a different version of the facts.
All of us who are actual professional
investors of some kind, whether on behalf of official funds, or
privately, must of necessity go back and consult our own waypoints of
investing – that is, we must consult our own actual records of what
we did, when, and for how much, and examine these in light of actual
results. And this is relieved of the dictats of clever and
manipulative prognosticants.
Having largely made my own personal
biggest plays in the go-go era of the mid to late Eighties, and
having necessarily been acutely aware of the types of mindsets abroad
at the time, I often told the less experienced not to swing the words
integrity and credibility around too much; for one
thing I always feared those who made too big a thing about these
qualities, and quietly questioned why they did it. For myself, these
things are absolute givens and not subject to serious question. Full
stop.
A businessman with this suit has integrity. Soros gets close, which is good enough. |
It's certainly not that I have changed
my mind now or my view of things or the principles involved, it's
just that I can't see modern era politicians and bankers in any other
position than one which must be experiencing a sense of vertigo that
they cannot admit to having. There is no ground under them, and there
are no safe holds for them. The Dow is at great heights and sales and
profits are under great question. Circulation velocity is anaemic and
the notion of austerity matched to spectacularly unrealistic interest
rates and simpering, keening, prognostications about economic
growth abound in the mouths of everyone from Stanley Fischer to
Bernanke to Dimon and/or Levin.
Notably Soros and Faber and Rogers and
the rest of the private investor old guard are saying
something else quite different again.
Currently the Yen via Japanese
Government Bonds is adjusting what performances can be expected over
the short run from Japanese corporates. I expect a phase of stunning
and amazing superficial
technology presentings to be brought about by the monetary policy
currently being unfolded in Japan.
When taking serious
market positions I personally tend not to go by particular views
about the future, but rather, I structure or 'wind-in' a set of
positions based on the immediately obtaining dynamics of the
situation.
Mansory Maserati - definitely NOT the banker's version of Punxutawney Phil's hutch! Stockbrokers with integrity drive this car. |
Thus,
if I were to utilise
positive revenues from equity upside positioning (adopting what is
currently being claimed as the relatively attractive
'equity risk premium') then I
would certainly also be positioning myself in low dollar priced
long-dated Calls.
I have never been
more confident of the directional pull of the existing dynamic
tensions. And because of it I am most unlikely to go around making
predictions or prognostications about the future or the outcome of
markets' trajectories! There is no way I would want to alter what is
being offered cheaply right now, just because I happen to have some
kind of mathematical calculation that, if seen, would cause
Bernanke's carefully-trimmed bearded jaw to drop and Fischer to look
for a hole deep down Jackson way to crawl into. Which is where he
belongs in the first place. A kind of Punxsutawney Phil of the
financial world.
Calvin J. Bear