So, I invited my Swiss cousine and the rich French people to this years worldwide live-streaming (in the Palace city cinema) of the Royal (London) Ballet's 'The Nutcracker.'
The French decided they would skip and instead we would do the more usual 'rooftop' Martinis at 5:30 PM (long after the show which was at 12 Noon).
And the rich Swiss cousine was caught in Geraldton having well, just plain driven way too far and forgetting you have to get back also...
Man, that's pretty scary, look at that!
...It was all very fortuitious.
I told the French people I would have been stuck trying to explain away what could not be explained:
How an exact same thing from the exact same theater company only one year distant in time could be so far apart in standard.
In my opinion at least, 'suddenly,' Gary Avis 'retired' this year and I think he resigned knowing what was afoot.
...I had told all three of the people that, hey I know most religious philosophies always talk about the past, things which might have happened 'way back in some dim history,' but I would give them delivery: now, today as it were, with The Nutcracker.
Because this was the key 'occult' 'theos-atros:' where the God APPEARS.
It's so hot down here right now as I write, I should be asleep but this whole thing is keeping me up.
It's so hot down here that I did not even cook my usual Christmas Steak-and-Kidney pie. I'd do anything for something like that right now!
Never in my life have I ever seen a more atrocious, performance of this ballet.
The 'lead' dancer doing 'Clara' the young girl, dances demi-pointe, not pointe... And that is just the beginning of the sad story.
I am convinced the 'Fairy Queen' was actually a man - and if it was not, well in any case that was the most exorbitant piece of miscasting I have ever witnessed. There are plenty of roles in ballet for 'mannish' women dancers - but the role of the Fairy Queen in The Nutcracker is not one of them and please don't anybody make the obvious joke. Because I don't think the producers were joking. They very much intended to depict what we all had to sit through. I almost walked out but realistically I would not have because I always like to 'know' what I am talking about and thus I do need to have watched the whole thing.
The Second Act was no better, however we saw the revelation of a young dancer Nadia Mullova-Barley, who needs to get the heck out of this production company and into a real one ASAP.
She was exciting, perfect, and has the necessary plastique and port de bras.
If you go back to one of the posters' comments here just immediately previously re links between EWS and The Nutcracker, the AI response they got contains the words 'symbolizes' and 'metaphor.'
The true theatrical production of this ballet is not a metaphor or symbolic - it is the actual delivery.
And it is very dark.
Mariinksy Version. I should correct myself and say there are in fact three versions - there is the Nureyev Version; which is a third distinct iteration.
All of the formats, original Russian and Peter Wright more 'drama/straight story/play' style ballet - have a standing clock in the shape of a very serious-looking owl, same as the large figure at Bohemian Grove they end up burning there (which is a real challenge to the Gods by the Illuminati people and is a major insult).
And Drosselmeyer is a sorcerer who floats with a cape like Dracula (in fact, it is Dracula that steals this from the original Lev Ivanov ballet production! ...Which contains all sorts of wondrous special effects and illusions) and does all kinds of quite sinister magic.
It's really all very dark.
Except it isn't. 'Dark' only because truly serious, plangent, your own life depends upon it, stuff.
And, like Karl Lagerfeld's 'The Tale of a Fairy' and Roger Vadim's 'Night Games' you will be allowed to see past, and also understand the slipping veil - the slip of the veil - between magical dreams (not the same as any other kinds of dreams) - and real life 'the next morning' as it were.
Well not 'as it were...' ...Actually.
It is ultra-important though, for those really interested in pursuing this to its logical conclusion, that I do not just lay out dot-to-dot explanations of things that are truly 'out of this world' when it comes to the libretto of this ballet.
Anna Mouglalis is shocked, when she sees the Fairy.
The magic is there and each individual discovers it themselves as pertaining to their own personality and self - so long as the right guide has shown the way into the darkness.
You've got to get out of the darkness yourself and you can through this 'play' performed as dance. And don't forget when we say 'dance' in high culture, in the Classical Culture, we mean one of the Divine Muses...
But the darkness of course, is not the darkness in the story, darkness as metaphor or symbolism -, but it is the real darkness of real life, of human mundane existence separated from the Divine.
Most, well no not most - all, of the religions are in fact mundane and absent of God; they only use the nomenclature to trick people into following along as mind-controlled slaves in an 'Outer Darkness.' They only use form and outward show and ritual to mask their emptiness within.
If you practice a religion, a modern-day standard religion, any of them -, you are in the Darkness, separated from God, from the Divine...
Which is not to say, just like at Bohemian Grove, those signs and symbols are not taken, stolen, from actual Divine Things; they very much are.
When the murderers of the previous king, installed their puppet eight-year old boy 'king' Josiah, they destroyed the Groves - which were sacred to the priests and priestesses of the original Hebrew peoples.
What's this got to do with anything?? Nothing. LOL
And all of these people, Lagerfeld, Vadim, Diaghilev, many others - are from Bohemia.
'Bohemia...' 'Hem/Heim' just simply means 'home;' so, 'the home of -.'
The Boii however, I will not deconstruct here, except to say that it is ancient Veneti - a word from the Ancient Veneti people.
Well, I will say this much - it means in part 'the Lords' or the 'Kings' who descended, were 'the children of -.' Someone. And who wandered over Europe mostly but elsewhere as well, After the Great Flood.
Diaghilev would be spinning in his grave in Venice, were he to have watched this performance.
There. I've gone and said it now -, so now you all know where Diaghilev is buried. It is in Venice.
'Meyer' - the Illuminator (of the Darkness, of course); he places the Star Fairy on top of the Tree of Joy. The Owl. The Grove. The Palace of the Fairy King and Queen (not that kind of 'fairy!!). (Behind) The Wrought Iron Gate. The 'Lords.' The Cloak.
And don't forget, because I have told you - The 'Star Fairy,' Peri-Asteron, is from the Gospels.
I have told it all, and now you know where to find it. And it is not in Monte Rio, California.
Everyone is aware that part of how 'AI' operates is that it trawls the internet and selects from anything and everything ever posted by anyone - by any real human person - and then makes out that it 'knows' stuff.
But because everybody is aware of that, no one who actually knows something truly special, is ever going to post it publicly anymore.
The Angel's trumpet sounds - but few are able to hear it.
This kind of thing is not new.
Euclid and his followers got so good at hiding the things they knew, that at one point of our history, there was only one actual 'book' of his 'Principles' held by any more-or-less public keeper of important texts and knowledge - the Great Library of Baghdad - and it was nearly lost forever when the Muslim convert Hulagu Khan had the entire Library sacked and all of its contents burned and thrown into the River Tigris.
It is always the case that when a carnal, Earthly, tyrannical dictatorship (usually under the guise of a religious duty) rises to power anywhere, they will destroy all past records and knowledge and try to assert false new teachings.
The courtiers of the boy-king Josiah did it around 600 BC when they in the first place murdered the immediate previous king and installed an eight-year old as their puppet.
Hitler did it during his reign.
'Book burning' was a thing both in Nazi Germany and Fascist Spain during WWII.
But if you go back to the matter of Josiah, then today's 'Bible' is very obviously a false narrative, and as always, is 'history being re-written in favor of the winners, violent conquerors,' with an enormous amount of turgid justifications for bad behavior.
And inside Pandora's Box, was left only Hope.
'Muhammad' did it when he gained absolute power where he was.
Everybody that 'wins' does it.
Of course most people don't want to hear any of this, or they selectively like to hear only some of it.
If there were a clear-cut counterpoint case -, the situation of some group of people who really were under the influence of real knowledge about real god/Divinity/whatever term you like to use - then the rational minded observer would be able to say 'oh look this is right and those others are wrong.'
And the whole thing would be obvious.
What is absolutely clear though, is that it is not obvious. Nothing about the question is obvious.
The militant atheist will simply say 'look it is obvious - there is no God.'
The honest objective observer would say however - If 'God,' then God must be in-obvious.
And he, the honest objective observer, would start looking around for the in-obvious.
In a few minutes it will be Christmas Eve where I am.
And today, I will go and watch the globally-streamed in-cinema Royal London Ballet's version featuring Gary Avis, of Alexandre Dumas' The Nutcracker.
'Helena' the young daughter of the Harford's in Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut, asks for a Nutcracker Doll for Christmas, as you know.
In the cinema here, it only was shown at the Lunchtime 12 O' Clock sessions - over four days - and it was sold out and there are no tickets left (I have one!).
It is not on in the stage theaters here. Virtually nothing to do with Christmas is evident in the city anyway this year.
We are not having 'Christmas.'
Possibly if the broader public knew the secret to Eyes Wide Shut is contained in Dumas' The Nutcracker, then suddenly everyone would want to go see it and it would be on at every live performance theater.
But as it is the thing is now a secret and those who know are gatekeeping it.
Every religion you know will give you nothing - maybe it will give you hope but you had that all along anyway.
When the Ragnarok happens, and the world is cast into Infernal Darkness for Three Days and Nights, then the Earthly city of the Aesir, is destroyed and the bridge back to the Heavenly City of Asgard is broken because of so many of the minor gods trying to rush across it all at the same time.
Some of these are killed - as in they are literally permanently destroyed, gone forever, their personal selves and consciousnesses ended.
...But I have told you the secret of the Tree.
And now, I must add a bunch of lines to stretch out the page so that I can fit the tree pic in, and blah blah blah blah blah. LOL
What can I talk about...
Oh, well, at least I can end here by saying that religion is about hope, and also of course about blindly serving your rulers who need you to serve them -, but knowledge of the Divine Things is about delivery.
Kids know about delivery, because they cannot feed themselves (some of them starve and die too because of lack of care and food), but adults eventually lose even all hope during their long and fruitless lives, pretending to some 'niceness' towards what they project 'God' or some 'Ultimate Provider' to be; 'sci-entists' insist that that they (and of course they alone) have the solution which is them hypothecating practical engineering into levels they do not even believe in(!) - but when you are old you'd better hurry up and find out the truth, because soon enough you will be wandering into the Outer Darkness from which there will be no return and hope alone will not save you.
No comment. It's a 'Festive' time. Muslims everywhere can kill and eat the Lamb of God for sure! Even London Muslims, except prolly not them, bcuz they are all broke there. Meanwhile, Silver went to over a hundred bucks Aussie.
Why do the Gods make it so hard?
They don't make it hard. Humans have egos and unless a person discovers a particular important thing for themselves, they naturally doubt that anyone else has it, that secret, or will impart it freely; and even then, the person receiving the direct and complete knowledge, the secret, will not be happy because of their egos.
And here is also a trap too, because if you find the secret, 'all by yourself,' and then pretend that it was you and your super-powerful Self, your Ego, that enabled the discovery -, well then the Gods will once again retreat away from you though.
But let me just give the end result, the outcome, the Ultimate Place, the Asgard -, without having to drag you all the way through the long and winding and probably quite slow, process, of 'discovery:'
...Why do you place limits on yourself?
Peter, trying to walk on top of the water:
'Help! I'm sinking and I'm gonna drown.'
Me: 'Yep. That is true.'
Jesus: 'John -, you're a bastard.'
Me: 'Yeah but I'm not God - and neither is Peter. So he shouldn't be trying to do stupid things.'
Maybe, at least in part, finding out what the actual real true secret is, is to know and accept the difference between really good things, and stupid things. Sure we want power to have good things. but that is actually the easy bit.
Even Midas did not himself necessarily fully believe in the Gods until one gave him his silly wish.
aka - 'Be Careful What You Wish For.' ...Christmas time there are Elves about the place and they are - could be - listening; and they can be a touch naughty:
I've been in this for - well, if I said 'since I was born' that would be an understatement of a very large order.
But I also have this capacity to 'fit in' and pretend that hey, I am like everyone else...
I can't stop laughing at myself.
I'll be honest - I think she really had some emotional connection with this guy. And then he died! I mean hey, he was old. So people do that sort of thing.
Because unlike people such as Kory M., who I have a lot of time for in the sense that I think she has integrity and is always telling the truth (and not everyone in the 'ET' whatever else space, does that!) -, anyway unlike her, I do not go out and encourage 'Orbs' to turn up.
But I can do that and I did do that more or less on behalf of 'Mr King' here who was working on the basic instruction kit - and myself too I guess because I just wanted to 'see' that he would be able to 'get the results' (that they are prepared to give at this time right now).
I am human (not, but sort of!), in that if I don't get my way ASAP, I can get angry and frustrated like everyone else.
Also I am a lot more 'down-to-Earth' than maybe I give out, in here.
I am not all 'spiritual' and 'nice/good,' 'religious,' whatever.
And so there is a point, at least for me, of being able to repeat something over and over, test it, prove, that it is 'true.'
...So I was wandering around from about 11:30 I think. But I had been going down to the parks by the river where there are these 'fitness stations' to work out. Not to go out just to look up at the night sky for 'Orbs.'
At some point this idea popped into my head (and I had not opened my emails yet so I had not yet read what Mr King wrote me...) - that maybe I should 'watch the skies -.'
I did that for at least an hour, was getting frustrated - and it was cold which it should not have been, this time of year down here! I literally yelled at them in my head 'I'm going inside it's too cold.'
I went inside, made a coffee. Opened the emails. In my head, clear as a bell: 'In the middle of the Southern Cross. Go outside now.'
Went outside just one more time and looked right in the middle of the Southern Cross where I 'knew' they would be.
There are no masks, actually. 'Masks' are a convenient device to not scare people.
'Sure enough...' What the heck am I saying?? 'Utter shock' but sure enough, clear as a bell, very bright Orb straight through the center, long, slow - so that I could see it easily and freak out(!) and then disappeared. From my side out into the middle of the Cross. Appeared out of thin air. They've done plenty of stuff before so you know they are not planes, not satellites, not nuthin' you should know from Earth objects. Make all kinds of maneuvers, up, down, sideways, around, fast, stop, back, shooting off.
But this one was 'you happy now, ya idiot?'
That's how it is.
I look at my watch. It's 1:50 AM.
From my experience it takes anywhere from just twenty minutes to easily an hour and a half, and you have to be in the right frame of mind.
People like Kory and Chris Bledsoe go on about that better than I can.
I'm not that kind of person. I do not go around 'feeling love.' That's the 'frame of mind' they all talk about. ...Just for no reason at any time, spontaneously. That's not me. LOL
But I can tell you right now that 1. Orbs are real; 2. behind them are people, albeit they are not Earth-people but they are people somewhat like you and me.
They're not weird-looking like Steven Spielberg wants to have it.
And if I say 'Orbs are real' let me tell you something, not Congress, not 'scientists,' not Neil DeGrasse Tyson - not anyone will be able to undermine the truth and the reality of it. ...There's plenty of people that already know that it is true; these other 'science' atheist lunatics are wasting their time and they are talking nonsense too. Banging on about their 'sci-ence' as if they would even know what that is.
If - if - I said it with that much underscored stressing, then it is true.
So I am saying it.
The Red Cardinal. I'm laughing at you, Spielberg. (I think we posted the Blue Wren or something, before...) Don't worry, you'll find out when the movie is released. But he knows nothing.
And that's that about it.
I've got more than just 'Orbs!' LOL
But Orbs are a start for most of the average 'interested' persons.
You are going to have a real shock seeing um, 'someone' let's say -, anyone for that matter, that even Hollywood would be struggling to keep up with as far as 'looks' are concerned, in other words to mount any sort of comparison with.
I think there's a real 'problem' or an issue at least, when it comes to there ever being 'Full Disclosure,' let's say, by the US Military for one example.
It would take some kind of fit being, to pilot one of those little White Tic Tacs around in the atmosphere, and even to have a 'normal' human get into one and be flown around in, that person would have to be 'out there as an outlier' when it comes to their health and fitness and condition/conditioning.
The story from various people such as Bob Lazar and so on, is that 'UFO's' have a 'field' around them inside of which pretty much normal gravity obtains; but I don't think that's right.
It might be right when it comes to going into space and travelling inter-dimensionally, but here in Earth atmosphere, 'uncloaked' as it were, and where actual beings can be moved around in (the vehicles) so that the humans and humanoids can get in to, and get out of, the craft -, walk on the ground...
...then it is not right.
I am going around in circles here. I am trying to avoid saying, what it becomes necessary to say, at some point if one wants to genuinely convey the matter:
You can pick any one of ten or more of the absolute best-looking people you ever saw or ever knew of - but max their strength and sleek fitness up to 'absurd-level.'
You stay away from this stuff! ...If you want to see 'Orbs.' Because people will say 'Oh you just had alcoholic poisoning - and saw stuff.' As in 'didn't see it.'
That's what 'they' look like.
They look like us. Except oh dear, absolutely not when your brain gets into gear and you start to think straight!
I do not know what is happening to the world.
But something is very definitely happening to at least some people in the world.
I would prefer to be in the 'some people' rather than all the rest. ...From what I have seen and what I do know.
This track below is very subtle. You have to be patient with it. Just like 'calling in Orbs.'
Well that was easily the stupidest thing I have ever watched - the 'Disclosure' movie Trailer from Steven Spielberg.
The drugs they mostly all use in Hollywood must have seriously damaged what is left of his brain.
There's nothing coming from there, that's for sure.
Real light is beautiful. It is not strange and it is not unknown or unrecognizable.
Not that I personally expected anything but much of the online YT fraternity who make all these videos on the subject recently had their hopes up and they are even now pretending to be 'looking forward eagerly to the eventual release.'
LOL
I won't even bother to watch the thing at all now.
But if I thought the mass of the general public would somehow still not be taken in, and then following this insanity, be fully sucked in - to the complete fake 'Alien' incursion into our Earth that is slated up next, well then I'd need my head checked too.
...That is all on the one hand.
On the other hand, here we are here, and I notice just the other day, the Pixie Kristen Stewart getting screamed at from all sides for having said something that was misconstrued as her being 'anti-men' or something, when all she was saying was exactly what I just said, namely, that Hollywood is done; the men running the place have destroyed its business model, thrown away creative content, and made up their own quite delusional templates for how stories should go and what the public is to be fed.
'Here' being the place where you will get perspectives that you may not, really, have considered before.
A Being of Lights.
Look, here's how things are on this planet:
The guys Abraham (let's say there was such a person) meets are THREE unusual people, completely normal if probably quite good-looking human-oid people in unusually clean clothes for the time and place in question, and they get involved with him quite regularly to the point that he and all his children for a long time, several generations, easily recognize these characters whenever they turn up. Which they do quite a lot.
Suddenly though, this other guy 'Moses' for whom there is no historical evidence, and as Ammon Hillman points out, actual original textual support that 'he' was actually a 'she' (Mosa, not Mose/s) meets this also quite 'powerful' character, whose back looks like a dragon's, whose breath was of fire and flame -, and who neither Moses nor any of the Israelites 'recognized' at all...
Moses even has to ask him - 'Who are you?'
And yet somehow the Jews carry on as if this new character was the same as the THREE guys Abraham and his children down through several generations (the same guys keep coming back well beyond the normal lifespans of a single human) all knew very well and easily recognized.
Next, we get the boy who is eight years old, and 'he' somehow decides to wreck all of the shrines around the place, then kill, as in literally murder, a bunch of people, change the Temple practices off his own ideas, and what is the very FIRST thing his court does after he succeeds in violently physically overthrowing the original 'temenos priests' (who happened in any case to be priestesses and not 'priests') -?
They 'make an accounting of all the main Temple silver' (belongs to the God/s of the said Temple) and start to use it for themselves, and justify that by saying they are 'doing some building, renovations, and constructions...' Sounds a bit like a Freemasonic thing to me.
These guys claim then 'there is only one God' et cetera. There never was 'only one God' before that and the problem with the 'only one God' guy is he steals other people's silver and kills them with bows and arrows and knives and guns. This is 'God?' How?
It is time to keep your feet firmly planted on the ground. To be simple, but also profound.
Someone wants to have a pyramidal hierarchy leading to that ego-maniac narcissist at the top.
Because re Moses' interaction with some weird creature that demands human sacrifice and 32 virgins -, this (new) joker says he is God and he is the only God even though all of the previous references to the 'Els' are in the plural and there is even a Council of Els.
'32 virgins.' Does that sound familiar? I mean hey, he is being modest - afterall, he is going to give you 72 virgins when you die.'
And what does Jesus say? 'You don't know anything about Moses and you are of your Father the Devil, NOT Abraham. For the Enemy opened the Gate of the Fold and thereby wolves entered into the flock.'
Hmn.
...Just a little time later this other betrayer takes 30 pieces of SILVER; a bit of a book-end element of the whole story, for me anyway.
It's about money, isn't it. It's always in there somewhere when it comes to how humans behave.
And power but especially money, when it comes to humans on this planet.
Silver is money, just remember this. And when you have some, people will try and steal it from you.
We are going to enter a really difficult time for much of the people on the planet.
But not difficult for you.
People are going to get led - aka mislead - into all sorts of directions, and sometimes from which bad places there is no way back.
Things will not be difficult for you.
It will be very obvious to you, what is real and what is not real.
If you just keep your mind clear of the confusion spread by the media and today's Hollywood mentality about exaggerated dramas and action, and keep your feet planted on the ground of realism and firm material reality - a firm material grasp of reality - the first thing is you will enjoy your life, and the next thing is you will be able to perceive subtle things and changes when they happen, without indulging in needless speculations.
Futuristic enough, surely.
The Biblical saying is 'the entertaining of angels unawares,' not 'oh look that person is not from here and they have a space craft...!'
When you 'have things' (even if they are space craft) and everyone knows that you have them, then those who don't have them, will want what you have and they will do crazy things to get them, including taking them as in stealing them; taking them by force, from you. They might even try shooting you out of the sky because, hey humans have such technology. And they might have even more and better of it as time goes along too.
Pixies are sensitive little creatures. If you see something, stay quiet about it. There's no point telling people who haven't the same access to such things that you might have.
...Right now I have my own feet so firmly on the ground that I like to have silver -, that hard material substance, that metal. Never mind whether or not Elves and Fairies and Pixies are involved and the price - if you could go through a Time-Space portal and see into next year - was upwards of $500.
What if it was a lot more?
What if they wanted all their silver back from when King Josiah stole it.
Because he did steal it and he never got authorization to do it from anyone.
And it belonged to the Elohim, not to 'Elohe (singular).'
You just want to know how come it's taken so long.
And you want to see the big shiny space ships. Well that might happen too but not in any way that Steven Spielberg is going to tell you about.
Regardless of whether you have already found some access (maybe via one or two of the text documents from here) to the basic conceptual structures of what the people involved for instance, with Steven M. Greer, and also Chris Bledsoe too and similar people with some public profile, are doing -, whether you get your hands on such things and more details maybe, quite soon, the full meaning of what is going on and how it all works and especially too, what you are up against, will only very likely slowly creep up on you in your direct conscious awareness.
You see there's so much entailed in the whole thing.
Ethiopians doing Christmas drumming. Is haram Because it's 'Christmas' stuff. Drumming is not haram: 'duff duff duff.' Christmas is haram because it is pagan and polytheistic: venerating Three Wise Men from the East, cows, sheep, lobsters (the Nativity Lobster; you've heard, right...) Talking Stars, shepherds, Mary (the Goddess), and Jupiter and His Son, the Child Bacchus who dies and resurrects and so on.
And I have always considered it quite wrong to just throw stuff onto the table for simply everyone to 'acquire agency' (joking! but it's still kind of appropriate here).
There are many important reasons why not to go about things that way, but one of the most significant ones is that 'people' are already so far gone, so broken psychologically, that no amount of 'fact and evidence' will change the basic way they approach anything.
Let me give you an example.
Earlier today I was party to a discussion between quite elderly military people, you could even say they were retired or only in capacity as senior advisers of a very mission non-critical sort...
And one of them literally started out by saying there was not any evidence of these UFO's that other, currently-serving members of the Military were saying required to be formally reported to the public on (this mind you, despite that he, the old guy, actually has been briefed that there was a ton of evidence!) but then he qualified what he had said by talking about 'as in silver space ships just landing in front of them right then...'
Within I would say, oh, three minutes of the opening of the 'discussion,' the whole thing turned into a shouting match between two old guys, the first guy I just mentioned and another who was known as quite aggressive and in-your-face at the best of times.
There was shouting, continuous, repetitive insults ('were you on your way to your mother's?' That kind of thing, plus a few swear words here and there), from both sides and what do you think they were actually 'arguing' about...?
Would you believe it was Hitler. I kid you not. One of them just almost casually mentioned the name apropos of I don't even remember - it certainly wasn't significant - and the other began to give a lecture on the merits of Hitler, which was met with loud counter-statements (I could not, to be frank, actually see what they were arguing about - as in, what exact point...) and the lecturing guy said 'you are uneducated -.' To the other old guy.
I was here Friday. 'Raw concrete architecture.' This place has a stunning new and modern hotel built around a restored 'Federation' hotel. In Perth. That's real Chanel Chinoiserie wallpaper you can see inside, btw... REAL!
Now seriously what does 'Hitler' have to do with current information on the need to reveal relevant-to-the-public facts about formal government knowledge of UAP/NHI?
By the way, to make things clear, this was a 'meet-up' of policy advisers, right... So it's a political thing.
I'm watching via a Zoom-type call situation. Kind of. Not 'Zoom' the commercial brand system.
Anyway...
Who -, if anyone had any relevant formally-archived official facts and therefore 'knowledge' would impart to any of these kinds of idiots, information about any of it at all?
Not me, that's for sure.
Clif High, and he ought to be at least slightly known to everyone -, is one of the main individuals who have referred to various 'strange things/sightings' that happened during the Vietnam War, to US serving, I believe in his story's case, helicopter crew. I don't think it happened though to him, but to his father from whom he got the accounts.
I know in a first-hand context myself though, that what alerted the senior commanders to 'something potentially going on that had to be looked at,' was that the C135e signals and communications operators had been literally first 'seeing' (which at first was thought to be them on drugs or just so 'zonked-out' flying high altitudes for so long, nights) 'things flying around' and then having their instruments record those 'things' though.
...And only then, when the helicopter gun-crews started reporting similar things, did it become something way too difficult to just ignore.
Here's the point for you, though, with all of this:
Sooner or later some of you are going to 'come to the surface having had experiences.'
And then after that you will not simply have had experiences though, but you will develop capacities.
And with those capacities you will be able to see the same things the radar and radio and instrument operators in C135e's and KC135E's, saw during the Vietnam War operations, and you will at that point realize how many of the 'opposition' is out there, and just how few of the others there is.
And then, you too will be stuck also with a lot of disquiet about how the usual human's mind carries on...
The reality is that most people are incredibly assertive about what they think they 'know.'
And you cannot change them in being that way.
Pantone 'Color of the Year.' That drove 'em all completely nuts. Was 'white-man' - 'toxic white-man patriarchy oppressor -,' white. LOL
The silver flying saucer can have landed on the ground right in front of their eyes - and they will literally still find a way to get into a fight about...
...Hitler. Or something; anything.
The one totally crucial thing of all time will have happened, and it will have happened or be happening right in front of their eyes, and they will literally not give a damn in terms of clearing the page and starting to behave with some kind of decency and objectivity, but they will literally find the most absurd ways to 'prove' that they were 'right' all along.
Richard Dawkins will do it. Neil DeGrasse Tyson will do it. Michio Kaku will do it.
Absolutely none of them, as in not a single one, will just stand back and say to themselves and to you, more importantly - 'well F* me, I did not know TF what I was talking about at any single point whatsoever.'
And the rest of that inward conversation should go: 'and what gives me the right now to talk at all?? I am embarrassed at what a stubborn self-opinionated fool I was.'
Oh no, they will not say that though. Because five seconds after the 'mind challenge,' they will tell themselves 'but the sci-ence, the sci-ence; I was only following the science...'
Yes. As the Nazis said after they were caught and lined up to be shot: 'I was only following orders.'
The poor guy is all alone.
See some of you will have heard of the black man Ronald Mallett, the physicist, because I have mentioned him here a few times way back and you may know him anyway from your own reading.
But the public knows 'Neil DeGrasse Tyson' and they have never heard of Ronald Mallet, and they never will do.
And that's even regardless of whatever happens going forward now.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson and his backers, will want to insinuate themselves ahead of real scientists, even after all the cards have fallen and they are shown to be liars and frauds and thieves.
So. I think... regardless of how much real knowledge and facts and evidence and information and data and any other BS word you want to throw into the mix -, it might be wiser to just SU about some things and move forwardly quietly through the tall grass.
So yeah, 200 'bullets.' And a lot of bastards.
We move ahead slowly, and cautiously, and quietly.
Will 'things happen?' Oh yes things will happen.
Don't you worry 'bout that, my son (daughter/friend/sister/brother'ancient Alien Hybrid Human LOL). Oi Oi.
Almost everything you see on YouTube when it comes to 'modern mysteries' - the meaning of Kubrick's work (any of it, all of it, the last bit of it), the imaginary 'Epstein Files.' the delusions of various prophets and prognosticators, what happens at Bohemian Grove - is built on speculations.
If you don't know the name of the Angel who is speaking to you, you are speculating.
Epstein is 'dead,' no one we know who gains a public platform has ever been to Bohemian Grove on the inside, and even the scientists who spout on about the Grand 'Theory of Evolution' are talking sheer nonsense and we all know it...
The Russians knew how to craft! Carl Faberge. Iris in amethyst.
...I watched my Russian interpreter friend give forth about how dogs that were (purest speculation; because they never were and no one ever did time them) the longest to wait around the rubbish dumps as the humans came there became the ones that were eventually 'domesticated.'
It's utter nonsense.
'Scientists' only just yesterday (figure of speech) found out how the olfactory sense process actually works and dogs are not so stupid as to 'hang around rubbish dumps for food' when their own scent powers are as advanced as they are - and then only then after the rubbish dumps thing 'evolve' enough to be able to be 'domesticated!'
I mean it really is insane what the mainstream idiots 'believe' and which is always virtually entirely when you look into things, just plain dumb speculation; it's not even very smart stuff.
One of us here - 'Mr King' - who got the instruction booklet, will by now be vaguely coming to terms with one certain idea, namely, that you can tell the 'hidden,' genuinely hidden, nature of our life, by seeing/perceiving the evil things that go on: these brilliantly highlight that there is a sinister conspiracy indeed. And from that we can know enough to start to look for 'the other side of things.'
He (our Mr King) will be reminding himself of the leitmotifs of the 'Stargate SG-1' television series, and asking himself 'hey hang on, how come they are using these certain very particular images and designs/motifs but not explaining anything about the technical and scientific relevance of any of those things for real... If they knew them enough to know that they were.'
Merle Park and Rudolph Nureyev in Casse Noisette. That along with Maya Plisetskaya as the Black Swan, have never been bettered anywhere, at any time.
Do they know something and are not saying? Or do they see something (that is real) but do not know what it means?
'Sadly' almost all of the figures of ancient history and of the deep past - who somehow have managed to capture the culture and religious ideologies of the human race till now - are not here; they're all dead or 'disappeared,' gone.
And so we cannot actually manifestly ask any of those guys to explain themselves today!
There's a few on-line 'channelers' and so on, who claim to 'get messages' from various figures. But again, we are left to speculate whether anything they are saying is 'true' or not true and just made up stuff that we cannot check ourselves directly.
I have said this here a number of times - the number of people who are 'working for the Dark Side' are a myriad; there may be only up to no more than 200 (I am saying this, you will find it nowhere) available here at any given moment who have sufficient to counter the powers of the Dark Side (and I will not grant them, the Dark ppl, that they have any 'Force' whether Dark or otherwise). And of course one problem with a small nominal number of opponents suddenly disclosing themselves in any kind of palpable way, is that they would draw a huge focus to themselves.
Nevertheless, there is you and there is me - and we are both of us here.
And nobody else is looking at us, so we can talk over a few things that otherwise it might not be so wise to discuss openly.
To be released next year - the Ferrari Amalfi.
It is that time of the year again, during which 'the culture' (modern Western) somehow manages to present a few folk tales and fairy stories, inside of which though, is contained all of what is hinted at and even symbolically depicted in Hollywood pop fiction, but which is not understood at all by Hollywood producers and actors and directors.
And inside of these presentations, you can find, if you are properly led into their mysteries, the exact and precise methods and means to find your way out of the strictures of the ordinary material world, and into a plane where there are people with powers, that you can avail yourself of too.
Let's take for example, 'The Nutcracker' or Casse Noisette as it is known, when it is conveying the choreography of Nureyev.
There are, two different styles, therefore -, of 'the Nutcracker.' One is the choreography of Lev Ivanov and Marius Petipa, and the other is based on the choreography of Lev Ivanov, but adding and focusing on specific quite large new elements, given to the work by Rudolph Nureyev.
Both works are magical - the first being implied magic, and the second being manifested magic. You can't really do a 'Casse Noisette' unless you are able to manifest magic, like Nureyev and Merle Park were able to.
All of you who read here, also read things and watch YT videos about the themes that we talk about in here, inclusive of 'will the Aliens ever really show up for real...!'
In Homer, you can tell one of the Gods masquerading as a human, by the way they walked...
And at some point the question becomes 'what is the meaning of Life.' Our life, human life, human consciousness and existence.
Well.
You can answer that question by going and watching a decent version of the original 'The Nutcracker' but keeping in mind from the very first moment of the opening scenes - that Drosselmeyer especially gives the doll (he doesn't himself give it; he sends his assistant to delivery it...) to the little girl (this is the same little girl who walks off in the penultimate scene in EWS Part I - there is no 'Part II' but of course, there is, for smart people like you to understand), knowing that the doll will break.
The doll is designed to break.
Just remember about the 'Tree of Joy.'
...And watch the play/ballet.
Is there 'Joy' for you yet...?
[This is not 'Love Actually' music but it still is 'Love Actually' music... Nod nod, wink wink. It is of course, also the critical near-to-last 'mask-on-bed' EWS scene music too; although again, not 'actually,' just really]:
There is so much to talk about and it is going to take more than just one post.
Item 1. Firstly, at this time of the year, it is necessary to thank all of you who have been contributing so much - mostly behind the scenes (you know who you are) - and then also all who comment openly and are among the regulars here.
I once again mulled over whether to detail some of the major beneficiaries of what has been going on (behind the scenes too), but at this point I think some of you would be truly horrified at how actually difficult it is for the people in the Disabilities Communities, the Autistic kids and their parents and teachers and carers, and so I've chosen to just keep it all still 'under wraps' just maybe until early next year.
If I want to irritate and also confuse a certain crowd, I walk up and down outside a Freemasons' place, where the top lawyers and judges all go for lunch and dinner. And I sling this tiny 'French sock bag' over my shoulder and they all think I must be mad. Or something. Maybe just trying to 'have a go at them.'
One thing I will say is that one particular family literally experienced an absolute tragedy/accident - nothing at all to do with what they were already dealing with - in which their entire home was burned to the ground when they were out (luckily) and we were able to do a few things quickly to help along with the local area schools and business community.
But our whole original exercise was/is not designed for that kind of thing; it is designed to establish a long-term fund together with a fully set-up program for at least whoever wanted to participate from those communities, to be able to look ahead to some very positive employment opportunities and a definite realistically meaningful and productive future. But there is much to do yet because for one thing, there are two 'big-time' foundations and grants sources that are very much 'on the table' with us still although I want to hit them with such a big and obvious situation that it becomes good for them too and not just another exercise in typical stock standard 'tax rebate' fake charity. In my eyes it's pretty fake at least, the normal stuff. Not exactly wholesome is maybe a better way of expressing it.
...They do it because it makes them money, not because it really makes them feel goodinside.
Item 2. In a way this links with what is going on re the 'kit' and where that will all go...
Paleo-Contact specialist, Paul Wallis really hit one out of the park earlier today with his latest guest, David Lovegrove, whose expertise is in the Norse Eddas and the Nordic or Scandinavian traditions and ancient histories - as much as they are able to be known at least, those texts and traditions.
Lovegrove has really underscored the strong textual evidence in the very first place -, for what we all know as the mythology of Odin and Valhalla and so on, being really clearly related to the Ancient Anatolian pre-history (or what standard academia likes to say is 'pre-history').
And in doing that, he is really underscoring the reality both of the Atlantis Flood accounts, and the roots of all sorts of peoples and cultures - be it the Phoenicians as well as the Hebrews - to the deliberate diaspora from Ancient Anatolia post-major flooding but combined with the problems beforehand from a major massive extended period of drought first.
This is a top lawyer's 'gown bag' which they all sling over their shoulder to tell people how great they are, see... I think almost none of them would have the foggiest clue what my little French sock bag represented. It represents I have the best socks in the world.
But in doing that, and then also in bringing to a much more modern depiction of the ideas in the authentic translations of the early Norse works and in the cultural traditions held literally almost furtively by the Swedish Royal Families in particular -, Lovegrove (and Wallis tends to agree with him in that his own concepts about 'Paleo-Contact' align with these modern translated Norse language ideas), suggests that the Aesir and the Vanir did indeed live in technologically-based 'cities in the sky' and had material technology ways and means of transporting themselves there and back.
This, rather than that the whole story is merely myth narrative for moral teaching purposes and so on.
And Lovegrove really makes the point though, that the surviving and mutually-cooperating Aesir and Vanir now acting as a ruling Divine Group together, alerted the natural humans before they 'appeared' and are actually not inclined to just suddenly appear unless they alert specific humans they care to be involved with in some way... ...with the implicit meaning being, that they are still around, except they do not wish to involve themselves generally-speaking, with ordinary humans at all.
And so, this dovetails into Item 3.
You see the thing is this - you can get a set of instructions which provides some information about certain things to do; and then you will have 'things happen.'
A lot of these popular identities everywhere now, Lue Elizondo, David Grusch, and many others, cannot evidence anything, despite however many times people like to say or to claim 'they have seen' or 'the military has' (it doesn't have! But anyway...) and so on.
A small handful of others, not anywhere near as well-known -, people like Kory M., and similar, can evidence 'Orbs on call' as it were.
At the same time though, I am very aware that no 'cold document' will be as effective as say a video clip of exactly how the process is to be undertaken.
Little kit of stuff: WiFi audio player with trance tracks on-board; small but relatively powerful speaker. Instructions.
And yet again 'at the same time' once more - in keeping with precisely what David Lovegrove is tending to say, these 'beings' are not interested in just anyone and everyone pushing them or forcing them to show up.
What I have decided at this point to do, is to try and get a couple of photos - rather than a whole video sequence just yet - which visually describe certain key elements.
And then that will be a lot easier to post out to people, rather than try and send more bulky packages with simple if still quite 'mailing heavy' and tricky-to-work bits and pieces of technology which nevertheless though do not actually describe the process of how to work those bits and pieces properly.
Unless you know what I know, it's going to sound perfectly crazy what I am about to say, but I happen to know there are real material 'very strange and wonderful' beings about the place...
...And to cut a long story short, I was wondering and wondering, what the heck, why are we doing 'these processes?' At all? Why can't you guys just show up - granted you don't want to show to just anybody but at this stage there is all this 'Disclosure' drum-beat going on, and 100% there are certainly one or two or half-a-dozen people who are getting these 'Orbs-at-call' so to speak - why all the 'ritual?'
Well so let me tell all of you reading here now, something that does make sense (once you know it and certainly if you knew also what was behind it and where the application of it led):
If you're a soldier, you do a lot drills; marching around, parading, standing this way and that way, performing all kinds of ritual movements and actions, that sort of thing.
It's almost dumb and it's pretty boring if you do a lot of it.
And then one day you have to fight in a war and you find out it's really important.
I know it's Christmas Season and all that, but you be careful with this kind of thing - it's warm, and sweet, and it will knock your socks off!
Guy Savelli developed the Marines Special Ops guys' 'Situational Awareness' (and taking action!) program, called SERE: Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape.
And in the latest Paul Wallis discussion with David Lovegrove, Lovegrove describes what one of the ancient Viking chieftains went through when he was taken up - via what we all say today is 'the Rainbow Bridge' - and how he lost consciousness when he was coming back, and then the vibrations and so on that he felt when he entered Earth atmosphere again and finally landed back on the ground on open land. Touchdown!
I thoroughly can recommend taking a look at that video upload by Wallis. The link is that one inserted in the text above a few paragraphs. The key parts are in there but of course, it's two people talking so it's not a quick watch, but you can fast-forward. The last say, twenty percent of it, is amazing. I think so.