Today I was confronted with a
frightening fact: Anders Behring Breivik is possibly more diligently
well-read than me.
I mean I am a great reader who travels
far beyond the typical academic or commercial booklist
review-of-books. I used to work near enough to the seriously
commercial book-publishing industry to know how to find out who
really sells the most books – in other words, what books real
readers like as opposed to those
books that the marketing department arranges the sales of!
Of course by now
I'd actually forgotten that when I was an undergraduate at the
University of Western Australia I once tackled a certain Prof. Maund
with the complaint that the librarian was being suspiciously
deceptive regarding the works of Wilhelm Reich which were supposed to
be on the shelves – but which weren't. Only many many years later
did I discover that a certain City Councillor – one Paul Ritter
(the architect and town planner who had laid the foundation stones of
the original World Trade Center) – continually 'removed' (as in
purloined...) all said copies any and every time the University
replaced them on the shelves by buying new copies, until eventually,
they stopped buying them.
Kate Bush - wrote Reich-inspired songs |
A further fact was
that all of this was because of some dispute or other between Ritter
and the University itself – and partly also consisting of an
attempt by Ritter to get some free press about his socio-psychology
ideas that were being decried by the Heritage (buildings) Council
based at the University.
The fact that I was
the only person who ever did actually really notice the continual
disappearances of these books I guess means that popularity is not
necessarily a guarantee of quality, or, that quality is a fluid idea
when it comes to the written word expressing the ideas of
intellectuals and that not everyone agrees on what intellectualism
is.
In the past I have
tried to read broadly...
But Breivik not
only appears to have read broadly, but to have comprehended the
significance of some of the intellectuals he has read. The
conclusions he reaches are not ones that I can necessarily agree with
him about – but the danger of those intellectuals is if anything,
testified to by what Breivik did.
People who read
along the same lines as Breivik are likely to be 1. very few in
number and 2. rather intelligent to say the least.
Is
James Holmes one of these? And does he also have a Manifesto out
there somewhere, but one that is being presented in disguise and not
presently being attributed to him? I believe there is almost a 100%
chance that this is the case. I don't think either Breivik or Holmes
are lunatics at all. That is, they are only lunatic if you consider
Stalin to have been a lunatic, if you see what I mean. They will
achieve a certain amount of
their ends through the kind of determination that is, I suppose, a
little crazy!
Let me
show you an example of the power of people like Reich... Reich, I
believe, was not the man people have assumed him to be. He has always
been thought of as being both brilliant, and likely also suffering a
mental disorder towards the end of his life. And that is the fatal
mistake about him. Wilhelm Reich was so brilliant that he realised
that to actually have the impact he desired, on the type of society
and the type of person in society that he wanted to affect, he would
eventually as a form of therapy have to play a lethal and probably
self-fatal joke on the pathological and neurotic society in which he
was living both during the era of Nazi Germany, and post that in the
USA. His basic premise throughout his latter written works was that
scientists had to be
allowed to pursue completely erroneous paths and be permitted and
indulged in pursuing virtually obvious
complete failure – in order to challenge the psychological
straitjacket of a political society that was severely neurotic,
traumatised, and disturbed from centuries of violence that we were
mistaken in assuming we had coped with without impediment to the
sanity of the very system itself. He thought that by deliberately
going down obviously erroneous pathways seeking discovery, we might
find solutions where by going
down the straitjacketed ones by this time in the pathology of
society, we most certainly wouldn't at all and only prolong and
promulgate ever more neurotic pathology.
I'm pretty sure he
personally regarded what he was saying extremely seriously in the
same way any doctor would in treating an epidemic. The other side of
that coin is mass murder... Of course.
I recommend that
you listen to and watch the video by Kate Bush which employs Reichian
psychology – song titled 'Running Up That Hill.'
And then I
recommend the extremely recent/current hit by the Australian singer
Delta Goodrem – 'Dancing With A Broken Heart,' which is essentially
the same idea but revisited in the modern musical idiom. Artists
often know before others, what is going on. Well, maybe reflect deep
feelings within parts of the society before the whole becomes fully
conscious of them. Let us not forget, musicians like Wagner were
always associated with the rise of Nazi Germany. We are at a
distance now from Wagner -, but too close to Bush and Goodrem (pic on the right there) and the
trance beat generation to realise the signs.
Calvin J. Bear