When You Are SUPER Rich

Oh man. I tried to stay away from this kind of thing.

Failed.

Beneath it all (what I will say about expensive material things) I really just wanted to comment on how 'psychology' today is just another one of the pursuits that have fallen prey to the Post-War 'Baby Boomer' mentality which never went away since the Sixties.

It used to be that a psychologist had quite a good deal of actual real-life experience, before they were taken seriously. And that is because the profile of human life shows a distinct foolishness exhibited in the youth of most people - not all, but by far most.

She's going to meet 
George Clooney at the 
Nespresso shop to 
solve some mysteries...

What happened of course, was that smart-(ish) kids passed their exams and achieved their necessary grades - but were completely skeptical underneath it all, of what their professors and if not those, then certainly what the traditional written material actually said and taught.

And so then next, they completely undermined and modified the original psychology teachings, so as to accommodate their insanely foolish core internal beliefs held from their youth. With the result that succeeding generations of psychologists and teachers, all started to reflect in the 'standard credentialed narratives' - basically, BS.

There is no way a naive younger person will comprehend the nature of physical love and attraction. Which is not to say there are not extremely 'wise' young people because there are those - but such never will gravitate to any kinds of artificial social environments, of which the University is one of the most extreme!

This whole utter superficial, completely spurious investigation style into complex things occurs across the board. Imperial College London is the leading research institution that has gone into all of this DMT/Ayahuasca - and their main 'finding' is that both of those substances increase the amount of active neural connections...

Ayahuasca also has the unfortunate effect of dangerously increasing blood pressure both systolic and diastolic.

'Increasing the amount of active neural connections' doesn't mean anything. It might just jam-up your brain!

Increasing the connections of important and meaningful neurons and making vesicle threshold firings more efficient, could be valuable, giving rise to actual functional insights.

Coffee, window, thinking
about solving mysteries.

The DB (Designer Brands) fragrance company of Rue Marquatett, Paris, manufactures a range of 'inspired by' perfumes - all of which are substantially better than the 'real' ones made today. The 'real' ones are marketed at anywhere between $400 to $600 or more (!), while the DB versions are from between $15 to $25.

Some of the DB items are made in India, while the rest are made in France. All of them are excellent.

The 'original' Robert Piguet 'Fracas' regarded as a great classic - is nonetheless quite difficult to wear these days, because of the underlying civet and raw tuberose (not a very easy, likable scent at all due to the excess of indoles) notes which are both (as with everything else in it now) completely synthetic. 

The DB 'Chaos' inspired by Fracas, is also quite a challenge.

But if you are a 'frag-head' you will prefer the DB version and you will buy it. This is made in India using the most ancient classical North Indian raw fragrance ingredients supplier's best ingredients.

Angelique.

Chanel Bleu de Chanel is supposedly one of the most highly-regarded (by today's middle classes) men's fragrances. It can sell from $200 to $900 depending on what 'strength' the thing is that you are buying.

DB's 'Blue' is ten times better of a product and costs $18.

Rich people things.
You and me not allowed!
Too exotic.

Also -, to me at least, it contains real, authentic, aged components.

Their 'Santorini Blue' is easily one of the most wearable, most inoffensive office sprays around. Price - $15.

So this is not to say super rich people do not buy actually tremendously expensive fragrances. They do - but they will restrict the use of those to very special occasions where it is likely or at minimum possible, that others might appreciate what it is they own and are wearing.

And they may well in any case use the brands I just mentioned because they are literally that good.

Same if you like expensive watches, or bags (especially the notorious Hermes thing if you are a woman), or pens. Or cars.

The Kuru Toga Dive (and also the Mitsubishi Zento Signature) are the most insanely over-engineered writing instruments in the world. They are also the best.

Casio F91W Terrorist watch.
Stop it, Bill. That is not me.
ASIO are p*ssed enough with us already.

None of these things are 'expensive' by comparison to the brands that the media will tell you are what rich people have and use.

I was trying, very hard, to stay away from talk of expensive luxuries and 'things.' But that ain't gonna work out. LOL

We'll be talking about spending lots and lots of money next few 'episodes.'

Kuru Toga Dive Aurora Purple.
It's just a pencil.

Y'all know that Mickey Spillane wrote a lot of the original Ms Marvel, Batman, Superman, and Captain America comics, right...

'Prepare to meet your Doom Earthlings! Galactus is Coming.' LOL Worthy of him. (I mangled the actual lines).

I won't be going to see the flick but it does have a line in it there that will go down as a great classic, no doubt about it.

Angelique is another one of these trained opera-singers who have jumped across to Trance, in this case it is known as 'Progressive Vocal Trance.'

Varnishing Over The Truth

LOL

Hey what's life without some controversy, eh? Some of what is in here will be seen as quite controversial by a lot of people. ...The problem is it's all true. 

Anyway... Our regular friend and contributor, the redoubtable 'KP' (not Katy, the one who just left right here after taking some pics with our native wildlife...) gives a good lead into some interesting matters.

'Urushi lacquer' is of course, and as you know - illegal in California.

Not traditional design, but
still 'Urushi.'
You see anyone writing with
one of these, that's
many thousands of dollars in
their hand.

It is very expensive; the good examples of work done using it. It's a resin taken from the Urushi tree, which produces a toxic sap from which the lacquer is then derived.

I mean the reality is that after the substance is processed into the actual lacquer, it is not toxic, but that is not going to stop Cali, is it. I'm not completely sure but I certainly would not risk going to LA and signing some agreement with some talent using a Japanese Urushi lacquer pen... 

A lot of common enough substances that are around are toxic in the raw state, but when cured become completely safe.

Australian indigenous people use the Zamia Palm and also Redgum tree resin in much the same way that the Japanese have done for centuries. In fact the Australian Aboriginals actually eat lengthy time and hot sand-cured Zamia Palm nuts.

I don't really want to discuss pens and illegal lacquers and all of this, but I do want to look at how broader human societies and cultures generally always seem to varnish over truth.

It is totally impossible to say to a well-schooled Jewish faith person, or to a Muslim trained in their own standard traditions - that there is no word 'One' in actual earliest source religious texts. That 'word' was derived from highly sophisticated cultures much before any of them were even able to write much less spell and understand the concepts involved.

The concept that was later on twisted into some idea about 'monotheism' comes from musical exegetic texts to do with 'harmony' and 'unisons.'

This is also Japanese.
Very fragile.
They break a lot.
But I still like them.

David, the identity supposedly to do with the Islamic Zaboor (also 'Zabur'), was a musician.

David, the identity that the Jewish faith people say is their ethnic prototype (there was also a Persian they counted in the same category) 'Messiah' was not only a musician, but one preferred literally by 'God' and then outright called 'a god' by 'God' in the mainstream religious text itself.

Yet, all modern-era Jewish religious scholars say that 'the Messiah' is not 'God' or certainly not 'a god.'

Yet the text actually says that David is a god (a divine being). That he was once mortal but became immortal and lives today.

Most people around today, especially the standard average Muslim (and everyone in California especially the actors and producers I am imagining that I could sign this 'agreement' with, that I casually mentioned above, although I am having strong second thoughts) will say that the Palestinians are entitled to shove the Jews out of Israel.

Whereas, Surah al-Ma'idah of the Quran verses 20 - 26 explicitly say that 'Allah' assigned all of Jerusalem and all the Holy Lands to the Jews, with no exemptions or exclusions possible at all to his direct order to the 'Banu Israel' to go and occupy the land; all of it.  

See what happens, is as soon as something in a formal sacred text begins to shift to some position that is 'hard to believe,' or difficult politically, or difficult to concretely prove in front of people's eyes - then the ruling establishments always tap-dance and back-pedal on the language...

'Yes, Jesus raises people from the dead - except not your mother or father, no matter how much you are attached to them... ...because naturally, prolly, you are a sinner.' 

This thing is the best Porsche
there is except it's a 'Singer'
and Porsche recently told them
to pull off the Porsche emblem on the 
front!
Because they are just plain too good and
the rich people are buying this version,
instead of the dumb fake 'real' version.

So Jesus not gonna help you. Sorry. Not right away. But later sure -, when you are dead and can't come here and collect receipts from us; we who rule over you and want to dictate to you what to do (for us).

Jesus cannot be 'Messiah' because 'Messiah' is not a god/not God; just a man.

Jews cannot control and dominate Gaza and Palestine, because they disobeyed Allah and so Allah abrogated his original orders. Never does say that anywhere in the Quran but doesn't matter, despite that changing the Quran is strictly forbidden we gonna do it anyway. And you're just gonna suck it up.

Three days ago, the IRGC government formally issued a statement saying that the Jews and Netanyahu in particular, used occult means and probably the Djinn (they specifically said that in those words), to carry out the destruction of virtually all of the deep bunkers, and also to kill of most of its leadership, and that 'unusual occurrences' happened right in front of them when they were hiding in the bunkers -, which indicated such activity.

Despite that belief in any occult powers being able to harm a believing Muslim, being 'shirk' - a fatal form of 'disbelief' (in Allah) in Islam - the actual Ayatollah (Khamenei) and his closest followers said it anyway. And no one anywhere has bridled.

Anytime, people cannot evidence the reality of some 'extraordinary' element of a formal system of philosophy or belief, they all make up new reasons for back-pedaling very fast.

In the same way you will find now that all of this talk about 'UAP's' will soon degenerate into nonsense about conditions and causes and reasons, anywhere from Lockheed has it and must keep it secret - to the human race is 'not ready.'

This is the modern 'real'
version.
It will cost you oh, dunno,
maybe $600...
I will give you an actual real one
for thirty bucks.
Later. Next time up here.
See, the 'real' stuff has to comply
with Cali and Cali-style 'rules.'
So, it's complete junk and it is
synthetic.
The liquid has not been cured.
Not 'properly;' not even 'at all!'

Sure the human race is not ready - it's never been ready but that never stopped anything in the past when the matter was real.

I am the one that told you explicitly a short while ago in these exact words - 'not by any human hand/not with any Earthly hand.'

And no other than the Ayatollah Khamenei is now agreeing with me.

I never told you 'Oh it's only just orbs and lights in the sky and maybe some gray big-eyed Aliens in your dreams.'

I said - real physical material people; but not from this planet.

And there I shall stay on that.

: )

And that makes this place a whole lot different to anywhere else you are going to be reading things about this vexxed subject right now.

It's the guys that are tap-dancing that have no clue.

And I never said I could not evidence things. I said I was starting up discussions and negotiations with Hollywood 'elites' because the ultimate commercial value is of course, very high.

Not that that will impel them to do anything.

We might have to go it alone and just plain hand it over to y'all.

And why not? No reason why not. Gotta be a bit responsible I guess with some of it, because it is dangerous - but mostly, just might have to tell it like it is. And show it, like it is. Will only ever be one-to-one though. I have no indication that there is ever going to be a 'landing on the White House lawn.' God if there is we're all (or mostly all) dead!

Nice calm Japanese track:

The Modern Secrets Of Colors And Fragrances...

So to avoid talking about something going on in the background right now over here, let's switch over to some more benign topics that no one can get into trouble with.

I made mention recently just as an aside in the caption to one of the pics, that the traditional 'Ferrari red' paint look comes from quite a unique process.

Luca Turin is not the only one who has pointed out how this all comes to be on the cars and which seems to make them look fast - and that's despite that there is some considerable psychology research into the fact that people do see the color 'red' as suggestive in their neural processing as indicative of something moving quickly. 

These are the best ballpoint gel
pens in the world.
The cheap ones. Mitsubishi Zento Uniball.
These are just as over-engineered
as the expensive versions of them.

It is an action-suggestive thing.

The traditional Ferrari paint job involves a minimum of three color-layering processes: firstly silver is painted on (this is not just raw metal, but an actual silver color pigment that is used), next one of the suite of reds Ferrari likes to typically use, and finally pink varnish is coated over the cured red paintwork.

Somehow there is a dynamic that makes the underlying red really jump out.

It's probably not that well known that all of the big brands that produce fragrances be it for women's cosmetics and perfumes as well as men's aftershaves and colognes - all use a German-made technology which detects each individual molecule in any airborne compound whatsoever; and so they know exactly down to the complete precise molecular structure of each and every one of their competitors' work.

However, internally, they are not allowed access to any of the compounds their own 'House' technicians and creators are working on either at the given time they compose them or even at any later time after they have had their work released to the public!

But in any case, these molecules are all industrially-synthesized. None of them at all in any of the major mainstream producers (other than Maurer & Wirtz of Germany and Florence, and Santa Maria Novella of Florence), use 'naturals' or mature their liquids in casks anymore.

So this German machine which is able to classify each compound, analyze and deconstruct them and then reformulate whole entire 'new' compositions - is able to formulate 'new' compounds basically by 'cutting and pasting' whatever elements the companies' internal designers want to arrange (re-arrange) from cheating on whatever their opposition already has out there.

Which is why so many brand lines these days more-or-less smell all the same or at least broadly too similar to really stand out as actually different.

When someone such as a Luca Turin or a Serge Lutin says things like 'the fragrance is translucent' - what they mean is that there is a layering process that has happened, in which something solid as a base has been 'laid-down' first, and then the powerful heart and also top notes have been installed next, but then something else has happened too...

Some almost-clear olfactory varnish, as it were, has been painted over the top through which light shines in both directions, creating energy and bouncing back information.

And when they say the thing has been 'orchestrated' they mean that each component when placed together tells an olfactory musical narrative: theme, dynamic tension, unfolding, harmony, crescendo, resolution.

These are not things that can happen with synthetics only.

There's no 'time in the cask;' no 'time in the dark and mysterious cellar.'

Why people keep supposing 'God' is a simple thing or understanding it a simple matter, I will never understand.

Humans are fruit ripening on a vine - despite politicians everywhere wanting to make them all synthetic objects only to be used, exploited, used up, and cast away. 

The story, the composition,
the light, the dark...

Politicians, just like the Jaguar Car Company and all commercial-industrial branded perfume manufacturers - fail to understand and certainly not accept, that once a human being's spirit is raised to the right formulation and composition...

...they become translucent and powerful and very very deadly.

Some are even red like Ferrari cars.

This is just Nature except not many people throughout the whole of human history have ever understood it.

Most people just see life and then old age and death.

Humans should be a musical composition.

Sometimes sure, they are a player extemporizing, improvising in a certain situation or context - but even so, as a musical score they can be played again and again.

The good songs you keep.

Most people say they don't really know who they are, or what they are doing here - what their ultimate purpose in life is, or even if there actually is one in the numinous sense of things.

But you've just been told and your life will never be the same again.

Sure you just want to see the Romulan Bird-of-Prey at fifty thousand feet above your head with a clear audible message: 'yes, we're here and we'll come and get you when you're ready.'

'...And the Wise Men returned to their country by a different route' because they knew Herod was not planning good things for them or for the kid.

Don't imagine your governments (aka all the 'Herods') are going to appreciate you learning stuff that actually counts.

And This Is Even Harder

I think to some extent it was favorable for me in the way I now personally would tend to look at accounts from the past (that is to say, those esteemed accounts of prominent historical figures) that attempt to give an explanation of 'human life,' of its presumed reason for even being, and of 'God' - favorable for me that I grew up literally in a tropical jungle, and mostly on military bases in and near those places.

When I say literally, I do mean quite literally -, not simply in some town or city in the Tropics; no, literally was in the jungle proper.

Not a tropical jungle. This is the
Shola Cloud Forest.
...Where the Fountain of Youth, is.

There are many reasons for that, the main one being that my father inherited some of the prime rubber and tea estates in the world (at the time), most of which were either up the sides of mountains or deep inside of large areas of forest aka literal wild jungle.

What you quickly learn if you spend a lot of time in those places, is that the one thing that successful life is fundamentally good at - is concealment/subterfuge.

Secondly, it's not a thing for me to conceive of even very advanced ET Alien civilizations as being represented in terms of their technology by some bland, blunt, amorphous, unexplained, obelisk.

So definitely I like Kubrick, but he isn't right.

Being around a lot of sophisticated military technology and equipment means you can easily assess whether some thing is current-level human technology - or is something wildly different to that.

Many religious narratives will give you this story that 'God' wrote some important words for humans, and He wrote those onto, um - clay tablets; and then the clay tablets were sent down to Earth.

Well in my book, they would have descended down to here, got smashed to ten million pieces and no one would ever have seen what was written on them - those 'clay' tablets.

Why 'clay' fergawdsakes!

How come no on has found some titanium tablets that came down to here say, er, ten thousand years ago, and have been preserved intact without corrosion with all of their 'God-scratches' on them so that we can see what is there, for real?

Good, and Beautiful.
And purple.

There is something not quite right with the 'God' stories that we all have been handed from the past generations.

Mostly are all 'not quite right.'

So again, you won't find me, blindly repeating the same old tragic narrative you will readily find across the internet, about Plato devising his 'Platonic Forms' and then being shown some geometrical shapes and having his Theory of Ideal Forms being conflated with his ideas about fundamental geometry.

And yes I understand I haven't talked about whether there is any reason intelligent 'Forms' must come before temporal objects - and that modern meta-physics wishes to say everything is simply 'emergent reality...' We'll deal with it later, but in short 'emergence' is nonsense. It's nonsense because aesthetics is not 'evolutionary.' 

Whilst those (Platonic) shapes shown by Wiki are sort of 'true-'ish -, true to his statements about the Ultimate Nature of Causal Reality and the conditions all those 'essential' things must fulfill (including simple geometrical shapes), in fact they totally avoid what he actually says about existential reality... And they are not what he meant by his statement that there are 'temples in which the Gods really live, and where they may be seen as they truly are.' This statement Wiki and others have conflated with his work on element geometry/geometrical forms.

And I will expand on that aspect here:

One of his conditions for 'God-level' existence of particular - what he terms 'Forms' (but that is just a Greek word for something quite complex to express in modern English) - is that it is necessary.

It (any one of the 'Ultimate Forms') is a thing necessary to have for existence to be the way it is at all. 

Thus, for conscious intelligence to be, it is necessary that there be a prime example of it in form, structure, meaning, dynamic properties, and especially hierarchies of value (IE morality/Justice) that are necessary to encompass what we mean by even saying 'intelligent' - conceptually.

Otherwise our apparently unique word for it is a misnomer and really is only talking about something else, something which could come under some other category of thing for which there already is a word and a concept. And by the way, this is what the world of AI is trying to do, make out that artificial mechanisms (data systems and algorithms are mechanisms) are forms of consciousness and intelligence - and they are not.

Bombay B&Tea.
LOL

He then used simplistic phraseology that would not offend the ears of the people of the day, and so he made it very simple, just like the obelisk of Kubrick; 'the Good is also the Beautiful.' He tried to qualify that with the adverb 'truly' - as in the truly Good.

...The truly Beautiful.

But just as the tropical jungle is insanely complex and sophisticated when you get up close to it, human concepts of aesthetics are just as complicated.

Plato went out of his way to say that he really did mean 'physically attractive' when he used the word in its strict 'Eternal Form' sense - 'Beautiful.' He might have even said that Medea killed her children (that she had with Jason) because of Jason's egregious behavior and that it was necessary for her to do that the way she did (she took them to the Temple of Hera assuming Hera would save them) and that it established her female 'power-righteousness' as much as she was reputedly outwardly 'beautiful' - even though she had committed actual murder.

The picture is thus immensely complicated.

It will not be that in some 'Cosmic Temple of Divine Reality' somewhere, there is, on a template made of titanium or never-corrodium, the equals sign which is the actual 'God' thing itself. And that is because whether an equal sign or the Omega sign (sort of the same thing), one side of the 'equal' must acknowledge the thing on the other side as it really is, and vice versa.

And yet, because it must be all of these things - necessary, Good, and Beautiful, it cannot be a simple thing like that.

This could turn up in the new
James Bond movie.

No.

There is nothing in existential material affairs that simply stands stationary like some neon sign out in the desert -, not even blinking in the night.

When you think about something that will take you into the realm of truly advanced intelligent beings - think of people, and their actions and interactions, their engagements with facts, with events of life, and with other people. Don't just think about a sign or a symbol; that will take you exactly nowhere.

Existence is dynamic and moving.

Morality is not a chess game played on a chess board with caricature figures and fixed squares of movement.

Of course mortal people desire ultimate resolution:

Why are they here? What is their purpose? What is the meaning of life?

Humans are here to find their minds; their power is to use their mind, and they have a special particular physical 'animal' attribute of making and using tools, be those physical/material or data and intelligent systems and preferably both.

The meaning of life is the perfection of material action. In the vast myriad of timeless situational contexts. That's why there are many lives. Of course I recognize that we all want to be 'saved' for me, for 'myself' as the paramount consideration as it were - and that can happen; why not? We are after all, only in charge of our own egos. So it's fair that we do think about ourselves. But we also abandon ourselves too easily as well on account of the strictures of life.

This is more the thing that would
turn up in my sort of
pseudo-detective thriller - 
and it would open in the screen credits
to the music below.
...There would be some
super predator/super villain,
closing in when the music peaks.

People are deceived at first into witnessing the physical power of youth, and then the failure of that power in advancing age, and so run to the wrong conclusions about life. 'It is as if they are held in such a way as to see only the shadows on the wall...' LOL

Super advanced living forms are expert in concealment, in subterfuge. And that is principally because humans - like a lot of animals (not all but a lot) - are good at taking and not giving back (the other side of the 'equals' sign...), are good at killing for gain, are good at wasting things, are good at abusing the kindness of others, are good at treachery, are good at grasping for power and control when they are not entitled to even think about it in certain contexts.

'Satan' is a human being. Is the 'Human Being' on the whole. Not everyone, not fully, but in the whole of world composite is mostly that.

The worst thing ever would be if the real 'Spice Melange' turned your eyes blue. Then, everyone else would see you.

The biggest mistake you will ever make is to think that what you cannot see, does not exist.

In the jungle, when you make that mistake, most of the time you end up dead.

Strangely enough, so do most humans anyway. 

Did anything just go 'click' for you?

Ammon, eat your heart out. This is a young Greek woman, and her hands do not have the burdens of arthritis, and here is your 'Medea/Drakonideis' music:

This Is Going To Be Hard - 'Behold The Sword Of Power'

These are words originally - at least in any written form that we have today - composed by a certain individual of the French-speaking elite who lived in Wales during the 11th century, whose real name was Galfridus Arturus, with people nowadays supposing the 'Arturus' part was either the name of his father, or just a nickname given to him because of his interest in the early English King by that name.

He is known today as Geoffrey of Monmouth ('Monmouth' meaning the mouth of a fast-flowing - 'mynwy' in Welsh - river).

Arthur reaches out and takes 
the Sword of Power
from the Lady of the Lake.

Geoffrey of Monmouth is known today for his 'The Prophecies of Merlin.'

Now it is the style of writing of these 'Prophecies' that I am going to look at.

They are, similar in image-construction, to the Apocalypse.

On the one hand people would say this is understandable since he was a 'religious' cleric, albeit one who functioned in a secular legal way (a lawyer) only, to help administer the orders of the English king to the feudal lords in Wales... On the other hand I would say not so; the style has to do much more with the reason also for the style in such texts as Revelation (the Apocalypse).

And here again you will find me slip-sliding in this discussion straightaway back to today's context, and this weirdo current matter of people seeing orbs around the place.

All of you who have at least noticed the now quite commonplace internet videos by regular people of them seeing and also even filming orbs 'appearing' and moving in unusual ways, will know that people claim to be able to 'see them appear at will.'

Saskia de Rothschild and
Diane Framand now make the
Rothschild wines all over 
the world.
(That's just for our Bill, who is looking
for some recent Rothschild reds,
I believe).

Those of you who are a little bit more avid followers of this phenomenon, will know that the whole thing is - even in the hands of government and pseudo-government/ex-government/ex-military officials - boiling down to that orbs appear in response to people's attempts to make contact with them.

So far there has been no discussion, at least not to my knowledge, of people actually coming down and appearing 'in person' so to speak -; but then there you have it. This will be the case quite soon and I do wonder what will be made of it all both by those who are prepared to talk about it, and of course everyone else who will simply not entertain any such possibility being true at all.

You will get 'the scientists' crowd and even the 'scientists' themselves and certainly they will all buy in as soon as the discussion online becomes one about actual meetings. 

Now you all know me enough by now to know that I never talk about stuff as real, if I do not have any indication that it is real. Yes sure, when I mention things, it will tend to be a little ahead of the curve, as they say - and therefore it will sound unreasonable at the time when I say it. At that (early) moment.

However you will indeed find that in fairly short order from now, the talk online in these 'communities' and 'UAP-interest' channels will shift from the 'and we have seen orbs turn up on call' to 'and I meet a person from that thing, or saw them close-up in real life.'

These things are not new.

Is like gold and saffron
and rose and honey, Bill.

In the past, when such phases in human history occurred, writers took to using a particular kind of oracular style of prose and even poetry in some instances. That way, outsiders reading the texts would not be able to readily 'put their hands' onto the exact meaning of what was being said.

And I am connecting that to this:

It is proving much more difficult for me to outline an easy-to-fathom way of keeping something particular in mind when you are trying to get close to, or stay focused, in your mind, on the best propositions - as a kind of a moral template formula -, so that everything you do in your life has the greatest chance of success because it is always drawing on positive beneficial dynamic forces in idea form in your brain.

It is one thing to merely say, that there is a gate, that such places are attended by what appear to be like, children, that there are small, narrow places of entry - rather than the big wrought iron gates to the dark mansion that Tom Cruise rolled up to where you will certainly be challenged as to what you are doing there... But none of that carries with it critical meaning as to why.

Okay so it could even be literally a space station or orbiting platform in space, and maybe it could be that one would want to go down the small passages rather than start with the huge spaces where there is much activity going on - you don't know what they are really doing there; they will know, the people there. It's their place and maybe one day it might also be your place, but first, you'll need to know what's  going on there.

...Or, maybe it could be the outer gardens of a chateau where they make wine, but even so, you'll need to know how to make wine to be in there for very long and do anything productive there.

...Or maybe it could be both of those things.

Not sure what 'red'
this is...

It's easy to say the fireplace inside a big castle is a nice place to hang out, but what is the meaning of that on an esoteric basis?

In Ancient Greek, the letter 'G' is not always sounded like 'jer' or the hard 'ger' but sometimes, it is sounded 'y' or 'hyer.'

The Book therefore, of Genesis - is the Book of the Origination (Birth - 'Ne-ssence') of the 'Ge' - the Greek word for the Earth (Ge; and in Latin, Gaia).

We do not expect to go into the Sun, to feel the warmth of the Sun. (I'm not talking about the actual Sun here, I am metaphorically speaking about something 'advanced,' God-like, powerful, central to life and experiences).

We could, theoretically, go into it, but we would have to have a different form...

And when we stretch our hands out to the fire in the hearth, the English word (Ger-thes, Greek word), to feel its warmth, we don't expect to stick our hands right into the flames.

['Aorta' is a misnomenclatura word - it means the 'Sun/life-giving main artery; the hearth - what causes life to the 'Ge,' therefore, it should be 'Ge-orta.']

Our life as humans is characterized by the grasping out for many desires - but, when these are attained (if, they are attained), what generally happens is that the sensation of pleasure is fleeting or even, fails to meet the height of the bar of our initial expectations.

Super-advanced people are not going to be interested in that.

They will want it all, and they will have it in a prolonged way, and it will meet with their intelligent expectations.

And this, you cannot explain to simple people, living simple daily lives, who have had no exposure to such things in reality.

But explained it will need to be, if and when people start declaring that they have been meeting with (literal) advanced super-species not from this planet Earth.

Yet, Earth is actually a generic term.

I have no expectation or belief of any kind, that all people, will be carried along in all of this phenomenon.

And so, were I for example, to try and leave some account, some record of things, it would consist of fairly nonsense talk, I would say.

'The Red Dragon will be slain, and the White Dragon will ascend to rule on his throne.' ...Geoffrey of Monmouth.

Next time, we will look at one of the Platonic Ideal Forms (which were never described in any of the extant works of Plato, as you will appreciate). With even just one those, though, you will likely be more favorably assessed, by the Gods. Perhaps you already have one and don't know it consciously.

And now, if Giorgia Meloni were able to sing: